To: Lady In Blue; Canticle_of_Deborah; MarMema; kimmie7; floriduh voter; JulieRNR21; NautiNurse; ...
ping
2 posted on
10/28/2003 3:39:06 PM PST by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: nickcarraway
Michael Schiavo is about as compassionate as a turnip. And his lawyer . . . don't even get me started.
3 posted on
10/28/2003 3:39:28 PM PST by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: nickcarraway
Who exactly was supposed to pay for the medical care to sustain a woman in a persistent vegatative state for an indefinite period of time?
I love how some of the same people who bash taxes, welfare, socialized medicine and illegal aliens getting "free" health care are somehow thinking that the taxpayers have an obligation to pay for this woman's care.
Sorry, but when a huge number of doctors and judges agree that her situation is hopeless, and she's been in a persistent vegatative state for many, many years - I do not believe it's fair to force the taxpayers to support her indefinitely.
If the family had paid the costs, then so be it - but the missing factor from all these discussions seems to be the cost of her care.
To: sweetliberty
Ping and bump for later reading. Have a high school playoff game to attend - REAL football being played in the rain! :o)
8 posted on
10/28/2003 3:44:50 PM PST by
Ladysmith
(Low-carbing works!! (223.0 (-37.6)))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson