Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge in Life or Death Case Considered Conservative, Compassionate (Terri Schiavo Case)
AP | 10/25/03 | Vickie Chachere

Posted on 10/25/2003 9:46:41 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 last
To: Graymatter
Editorial in Star Tribune today decries Bush intervention...

http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4174265.html
221 posted on 10/26/2003 11:54:13 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Bingo! Bump!
222 posted on 10/27/2003 12:05:18 AM PST by GeorgeWashington777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
How long will this "probe" take? Unless it is put on emergency track (meaning NOW), I don't see how it will stop further injustices by the liberal FL judiciary.
223 posted on 10/27/2003 6:19:08 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Terri needs an ombudsman

And that "ombudsman" is not this Dr. Wolfson, who is already essentially on record against Terri's right to live. How can a judge name a guardian ad litem who is already biased against the "ward"? Only in FL, I guess.
224 posted on 10/27/2003 6:21:09 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: All
Who would ever have thought we would see Nazi Germany II arising in, of all places, FLORIDA???

The Consequences of Casual Conversations CHILLING!!!

225 posted on 10/28/2003 3:58:40 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

Comment #226 Removed by Moderator

To: Graymatter; All
Do we need a new federal law here, just because some folks won't heed the existing laws?

Yes. I think we need a right to life amendment to the US Constitution spelling out absolute minimums for protection of innocent lives without implying that these are maximums.

227 posted on 10/28/2003 4:14:10 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: livius
>>They didn't mention the bit about Greer's wife being on the board of Felos' hospice, I note.

THAT would be a most serious offense if it is true. I'd even
say CRIMINAL, if Greer failed to recuse himself under that
kind of situation.
228 posted on 10/30/2003 5:36:53 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Greer said, he is under specific orders from the 2nd District Court of Appeal to schedule the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube.

If true, that would help explain why all appeals are quickly turned down. Another abuse of power, it sounds like. Either that, or blatant corruption.

229 posted on 10/30/2003 5:55:18 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
For those who keep pointing out that MS has used none of the money for therapy or what would be considered normal care of Terri, remember that the contention of the pro-death squad is that she is not really alive anymore and hasn't been for 13 years. Allowing therapy or anything other than leaving her lying untended in her bed would be an acknowledgement that she is still alive. Any act of care would contradict that.
230 posted on 10/30/2003 6:58:04 PM PST by Quietly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Another abuse of power, it sounds like. Either that, or blatant corruption.

The only "proof" I have is that article, but if true, it sure sounds like it is abuse of power and blatant corruption.

231 posted on 10/30/2003 7:04:35 PM PST by Budge ( <>< .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Quietly
Still, it's a tough argument for them to support when they are at the same time talkiing about protecting Terri's privacy and forcing her to suffer by continuing to feed her. I mean, if she is already dead, she can't possibly be suffering, right? And why would they be concerned for the privacy of a dead person? Especially given the "indelicate" (to say the least) way that Michael was talking about very private matters on national television!
232 posted on 10/30/2003 7:26:06 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
We've had considerable discussion over whether this was true or not. I read it in a post way early in this whole dispute, but many other people have said they have seen no information about it. It's very possible that I was misinformed.

If she was on the board, I'm sure it was before this case started. However, it would mean that she knew Felos, who has always been involved with that hospice, and that the judge therefore should have recused himself.

Someone suggested checking under her maiden name, but I don't know what it is. If anybody does, they should check the non-profit filings of the hospice, where the board members would be listed.

Where's a good detective when you really need one?!
233 posted on 10/31/2003 10:11:58 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson