To: sweetliberty
For those who keep pointing out that MS has used none of the money for therapy or what would be considered normal care of Terri, remember that the contention of the pro-death squad is that she is not really alive anymore and hasn't been for 13 years. Allowing therapy or anything other than leaving her lying untended in her bed would be an acknowledgement that she is still alive. Any act of care would contradict that.
230 posted on
10/30/2003 6:58:04 PM PST by
Quietly
To: Quietly
Still, it's a tough argument for them to support when they are at the same time talkiing about protecting Terri's privacy and forcing her to suffer by continuing to feed her. I mean, if she is already dead, she can't possibly be suffering, right? And why would they be concerned for the privacy of a dead person? Especially given the "indelicate" (to say the least) way that Michael was talking about very private matters on national television!
232 posted on
10/30/2003 7:26:06 PM PST by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson