Were is this county and world going.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: RMrattlesnake
Isnt it NAMBLA? Not MANBLA
2 posted on
10/21/2003 10:43:24 AM PDT by
chudogg
(http://chudogg.blogspot.com)
To: RMrattlesnake
"Were is this county and world going." Down the tubes it would seem. But I don't really believe that. There are a lot of good people left out there who don't believe in this kind of crap.
In my opinion, if we could blame this on anything, it is the politically correct idea called "tolerance." I don't believe that there should be any tolerance for child molesters of any kind.
And BTW. It is NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association). I recall my reaction when I heard of this abominable association a few years ago. My first reaction was disbelief. I thought that surely someone must be making a crude joke. It's no joke though and I understand that part of their agenda is to lower the age for consensual sex between these perverts and young boys to 12 or 13. We need to make certain that this never happens, but isn't it frightening that someone would have the nerve to suggest such a thing?
8 posted on
10/21/2003 10:54:30 AM PDT by
davisfh
To: RMrattlesnake
A child molestor has a right to 185 gr of lead inserted above the bridge of the nose @ approximantely 900 ft/sec. Their decision to harm a child this way earns them this reward IMHO.
9 posted on
10/21/2003 10:54:51 AM PDT by
harpseal
(stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: RMrattlesnake
A child, by definition, does not have full control of their Rights until they are of the age of majority. They can not be said to possess the life experience necessary to make sound decisions in certain areas of consent, one of those being sexual activity. While a case could be made in the extraordinary circustances of emmancipation, this is hardly the norm.
Anyone trying to coerce a child into sexual behavior, regardless of any opinion expressed by said child, is committing statutory rape and should be tried, convicted, and shot.
Anyone thinking they are completely normal for wanting to have sex with an under-developed human is a defective and should be erased.
10 posted on
10/21/2003 10:55:19 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: RMrattlesnake
You see as people get more accepting of the sin of Sodomy these crimes will become more commonplace. The right tried to warn people about homosexuals, but they looked the other way.
Now, little boys are their targets.
The plagues and death follow homosexuals where ever they go. It' s been that way since creation. Homosexuals, their supporters, and the innocent victims have been destroyed time after time.
NOW maybe people will understand the consequences of what they've done, because their support of it is comming back to bite them. Disease, child molestation, filth in public places.
Take a good look America. Is it as pretty as the left said it would be?
12 posted on
10/21/2003 10:56:42 AM PDT by
concerned about politics
( Have you donated to the Salvation Army? Liberals HATE Christian organizations! Tax deductable, too)
To: RMrattlesnake
The host asked the caller are you a Pedophile the man answered and said that is my sexual orientation, yes.
Sounds like Phil Hendrie's Show. Can you be more specific?
13 posted on
10/21/2003 10:57:28 AM PDT by
SwinneySwitch
(Liberalism is a Sin!)
To: RMrattlesnake
As Billy Crystals character (Danny Costanza) said in the movie "Running Scared"
"You have the right to a coronor...if you do not have a coronor one will be appointed to you!"
15 posted on
10/21/2003 11:04:16 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: RMrattlesnake
"The police will come to your house and take your wife to force her to have and abortion because you have too many kids already."
To be honest with you I (jokingly) believe the women who do nothing all day but sit around the house having kids with several diff men and no Jobs should be in full effect to have the above apllied.
19 posted on
10/21/2003 11:12:09 AM PDT by
AbsoluteJustice
(Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
To: RMrattlesnake
They do have rights, Miranda rights! The right to remain silent, the right to an attorney ........
24 posted on
10/21/2003 11:19:39 AM PDT by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: RMrattlesnake
Pedophiles want rights too. They can have all of the rights that start with "You have the right to remain silent."
25 posted on
10/21/2003 11:21:32 AM PDT by
Gil4
To: RMrattlesnake
Pedophiles have the Right to die!
To: RMrattlesnake
That right there is the essential difference between a democracy and a republic. A democracy allows what the majority votes in. A constitution republic, especially one like ours, is based on what is right and good. We have no place in our society for NAMBLA.
31 posted on
10/21/2003 12:08:36 PM PDT by
twigs
To: RMrattlesnake
Ayatollah Khomeini:
A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However he should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister.
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
Praise Allah, eh? Eyuch . . . I PUKE ON ISLAM !!!
.
To: RMrattlesnake
Fo da chillin? It takes a village,,,of,,,
35 posted on
10/21/2003 12:25:36 PM PDT by
Waco
To: RMrattlesnake
Slippery slope time.
IMO...within the next 10 years, you'll have NAMBLA advocates demanding "equal protection" and "right to privacy".
Once a society is forced to accept one type of deviant behavior, it becomes a natural assumption that others will follow in due time.
I cringe when i think what this world will be like when my daughter is my age.
36 posted on
10/21/2003 12:27:05 PM PDT by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: RMrattlesnake
>>>>>Why do you talk show hosts always attack pedophiles and child molesters.
It might be because they have kids.
>>>>>>>Then he want on to say that it is the right wing that make pedophiles out to be so bad when theyre not
Poor Roman Polanski, he's just a victim of a VRWC. I'll betcha Jesse Dirkheiser really just wanted it to.
>>>>>The host asked the caller are you a Pedophile the man answered and said that is my sexual orientation, yes.
If I said the same thing about beastiality, would someone make me feel special and wanted as well?
I'd get thrown off the air. It would come the day after I suggested chemical castration with a vat full of quicklime.
46 posted on
10/21/2003 1:54:34 PM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(The September 11th attacks were clearly Clinton's most consequential legacy. - Rich Lowry)
To: RMrattlesnake
Police have released this sketch of a suspect wanted for
sexually assaulting a 10-year-old boy.(The man tied the boy's hands and then sexually assaulted him. )
FR thread here
This article is so true. We gave the homosexuals an inch, and now look at what we've strated.
51 posted on
10/21/2003 2:16:48 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
( Have you donated to the Salvation Army? Liberals HATE Christian organizations! Tax deductable, too)
To: RMrattlesnake
Currently in Kansas, there is a case being heard. The ACLU is defending a man who got 17 years for having sex with a 14 year old boy. (He was 18 at the time.)
At first, I couldn't understand why the penalty was so much stiffer (no pun intended) if the victim was male versus female. (For a female victim, the sentence would have been 18 months.)
Then I found out that this is the third offense for the perp. I also found out that the ACLU is trying to use this case to claim that it is unconstitutional to forbid sex between an adult and a child as young as 13.
I sure hope this effort by the ACLU falls flat on its face.
52 posted on
10/21/2003 2:26:54 PM PDT by
MEGoody
To: RMrattlesnake
To hell in the infamous hand basket, obviously.
59 posted on
10/21/2003 6:05:34 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: RMrattlesnake
Are there no tress in Colorado?
62 posted on
10/21/2003 7:00:53 PM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson