Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter, Saucy Siren Of The Right, Sounds Off
The Day.com ^ | Published on 10/19/2003 | By FRAZIER MOORE

Posted on 10/19/2003 12:57:49 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner

In her book “Treason,” Ann Coulter lionizes Joseph McCarthy, the 1950s Wisconsin senator, for his holy war against Communist spies in the United States.

Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism By Ann Coulter Crown Forum, $26.95

Ann Coulter rules as the saucy, blond siren of the Right.

Lashing out at all things liberal and Democrat (labels she uses interchangeably), she treats conservative Republicans to a spicy brand of reassurance that has leveraged her into multimedia stardom with talk-TV appearances, a syndicated column and big-selling books with shrill titles.

A year after her successful “Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right,” Coulter carries on with “Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism.” The book already has spent 12 weeks on The New York Times list of best sellers, most recently in seventh place.

But despite bubbling sales and wells of success, Coulter has been faulted for research that is routinely sloppy and facts that are contrived.

“She builds a case on half-truths,” declares Ronald Radosh, a historian and author whom Coulter salutes as a fellow conservative.

“She's a cultural phenomenon,” concedes Joe Conason, a liberal columnist with his own best seller, “Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth.” He adds, “I wouldn't characterize what she puts forward as ideas. They're more in the nature of primitive emotions.”

Bring it on, Coulter responds.

“There are people who would scream bloody murder if I wrote, ‘It's a lovely day outside,”' she says with a satisfied look: People screaming bloody murder about her is great for business.

Continuing to do great business, “Treason” aims to spring Joseph McCarthy from history's gulag as “a wild-eyed demagogue destroying innocent lives,” Coulter sums up.

Seizing quite the opposite position, her book lionizes the 1950s Wisconsin senator for his holy war against Communist spies in the United States, a crusade she argues was done in by the soft-on-commies Democratic Party, which has since compounded the outrage by demonizing McCarthy with its “hegemonic control of the dissemination of information and historical fact,” she says between bites of a turkey club.

Writing the book was a mad scramble, Coulter reports during a recent lunch interview. She began “Treason” only last October, “but I worked pretty hard,” she says. “I cut down on TV (appearances). I worked every Friday and Saturday night.”

Veteran journalist and commentator M. Stanton Evans, who is writing a book on the McCarthy era, shared some of his extensive research with Coulter and “went over her manuscript on the McCarthy chapters,” he says. “I can vouch for the facts. Her interpretations are obviously hers. They're obviously meant to be provocative.”

Indeed, Coulter's McCarthy makeover only sets the stage for her wildly provocative main theme: Democrats, always rooting against America, are “the Treason Party,” she explains with throaty conviction.

Democrats have “an outrageous history of shame,” she says, “and they've brushed it all under the rug,” racking up a shameful record that persists to present-day Iraq, where the Democrats, she claims, are hoping for America's comeuppance.

So the broad purpose of “Treason,” says Coulter, “is to alert people, to send out flare lights: Warning, warning! Democrats can't be trusted with national security!”

It's all very simple.

In Coulter's America, everything, it seems, is simple. She reigns over a bipolar realm of either right or wrong; love or hate; smart or idiotic; men or — a Coulter favorite — “girly boys,” a distinction that in her book yields such questions as the language-garbling “Why are liberals so loath of positive testosterone?” as well as “Why can't liberals let men defend the country?” (By men, she means Republicans.)

“Everything isn't black and white,” counters historian Radosh, who has long contended that Communist spies posed an internal threat after World War II. Radosh draws the line at canonizing McCarthy for his blacklisting campaign to flush them out. “But the people who respond to her are people who already agree with her, and they don't want any nuance.”

Just mention nuance to Coulter and she scoffs.

“As opposed to spending 50 years portraying McCarthy as a Nazi?” she says with a scornful laugh. “THAT's a very nuanced portrait! I think it's just meaningless blather, this nuanced business.”

This nuanced business only muddies the issue, she insists, whereas generalizations are, in her view, a simple, get-to-the-heart-of-it way to make a point.

For example: “Gen-er-al-ly,” she says with snide accentuation, “it's not good to play in traffic. Gen-er-al-ly, when your gut feels a certain way, you better hightail it to the bathroom or you'll be wetting your pants.”

But is every registered Democrat automatically liberal, anti-American, godless, a liar and a “girly boy” — plus guilty of treason? That's a generalization Coulter all but states outright in her book, but in the interview has trouble defending.

“Don't worry,” she wants every Democrat to know. “The country doesn't prosecute for treason anymore. If they didn't prosecute Jane Fonda (for visiting the enemy during the Vietnam War), there's no worries there.”

She is lunching at an open-air Upper East Side bistro near the apartment she rents in Manhattan. (Coulter, who is single, makes her primary residence in Miami Beach, Fla. — “lots of Cubans,” she airily explains.)

Though known for her sexy garb (on the cover of “Treason” her twiggy form is sheathed in a sleek black gown), she is dressed down in white jeans and gray T-shirt. She just finished her column. She has hours of radio interviews scheduled later. It's a sunny, breezy day and life is sweet. The only cloud on her horizon, says Coulter, bright-eyed and full of herself, is insufficient time to savor her success.

At 41, Coulter has traveled a well-plotted road from her comfy Republican upbringing in New Canaan to Cornell University in upstate New York, then law school at the University of Michigan.

She worked for the Center for Individual Rights, a Washington, D.C.-based conservative public policy group, then took a job with Spencer Abraham, the current Energy Secretary who then was a U.S. senator from Michigan.

In the mid-1990s, she signed onto a project to investigate alleged wrongdoings by President and Mrs. Clinton, which in 1998 led to “High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton,” Coulter's first best seller.

From there, it was a short step to punditry, where she was well-served by her looks and sharp tongue, winning further notoriety after being fired by MSNBC and National Review Online for her inflammatory remarks.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; bookreview; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
This is an "okay" review. He's fairly even-handed, giving Ann a chance to answer his questions, but you get the feeling he's dying to nail her.
1 posted on 10/19/2003 12:57:49 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Marked for Ann Coulter pictures.
2 posted on 10/19/2003 12:59:35 PM PDT by Flyer (We now return you to my regular tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Liberals hate Ann Coulter because she is *BEAUTIFUL* and *INTELLIGENT*.
3 posted on 10/19/2003 1:00:03 PM PDT by Sir Valentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
"Ann Coulter, Saucy Siren Of The Right"


Hillary Clinton, CRUSTY Siren of the Left
4 posted on 10/19/2003 1:00:56 PM PDT by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
ROTFLMAO! :)
5 posted on 10/19/2003 1:03:07 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
I would like to nail her!
6 posted on 10/19/2003 1:05:40 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (CCCP = clinton, chiraq, chretien, and putin = stalin wannabes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
What they keep stumbling over is all the hoopla surrounding Sen Joe McCarthy and the House Unamerican Activities Committee.

I listened to O'Reilly throw that at Coulter about 2 weeks ago. She cleaned Bill's clock and hit it out of the park.

She stated simply: McCarthy was a SENATOR, Bill. It's not POSSIBLE that he controlled the HOUSE Unamerican activities committee.

Bill O looked like someone had just slapped him in the face....and then he mumbled...well, I don't want to get into arguing history with you.

Damn straight he didn't want to. I think it had just then occurred to him how obvious the slime against McCarthy had always been -- right in front of his nose -- and he hadn't caught it.

Senators aren't in charge of House committees today, nor yesterday, nor in the 50's.
7 posted on 10/19/2003 1:06:31 PM PDT by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
Hillary Clinton, CRUSTY Siren the clown of the Left
8 posted on 10/19/2003 1:08:18 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino; Flyer; HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Here you guys go...

:)


9 posted on 10/19/2003 1:09:01 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
"Liberals hate Ann Coulter because she is *BEAUTIFUL* and *INTELLIGENT*."

...AND...

...because she tells the truth about them in no-nonsense, unequivocal terms. She is totally in-your-face. I wish more conservative men at the national level were as tough.
10 posted on 10/19/2003 1:10:16 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (DEFUND NPR & PBS - THE AMERICAN PRAVDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Fairly even-handed, you say?

Lashing out, shrill, sloppy, contrived, "half-truths,” "primitive emotions," simple, bipolar, language-garbling, snide, notoriety, inflammatory


11 posted on 10/19/2003 1:11:06 PM PDT by rightcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MotleyGirl70
Wow, thanks. Could you get me a beer, too?
12 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:02 PM PDT by Flyer (We now return you to my regular tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
In strict occordance with the Free Republic by-laws, chapter 19, paragraph 4, which states 'any post mentioning our beloved Ann Coulter must include her image', I propher the following for your exclusive viewing pleasure:





13 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:09 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
"Ann Coulter, Saucy Siren Of The Right"


Hillary Clinton, CRUSTY Siren of the Left


Hillary, crusty foghorn of the left might be a slight bit more accurate.
14 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:18 PM PDT by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow.....The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Ann Coulter rules as the saucy, blond siren of the Right

I like saucy...

15 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:38 PM PDT by socal_parrot (sigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
"but you get the feeling he's dying to nail her"

So am I, but I'm not alone.

16 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:44 PM PDT by 11B3 (Old enough to remember the real America, young enough to fight to bring it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flyer

17 posted on 10/19/2003 1:12:59 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Clearly, the left wants to reduce Ann Coulter's image to that of a shrill, right-wing bimbo. But she has too many facts on her side, and she's articulate as well as sharp-tongued. She clearly knows what she's talking about. And it's about time that someone analyzed Joe McCarthy from an even-handed point of view, rather than as someone who existed solely to be bashed. While McCarthy made his share of mistakes (fueled by alcoholism), he was correct in his point that there was a communist threat in the country.
18 posted on 10/19/2003 1:15:18 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (good call)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
If they didn't prosecute Jane Fonda (for visiting the enemy during the Vietnam War

This "sugar coated" describing what JF did as a "VISIT" is enough for me to stop reading this article. Ann need not respond to this 15 minute seeker.

19 posted on 10/19/2003 1:16:54 PM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
I am certain I saw parts of this review before. Is someone plagiarising from earlier reviews?

Also, why do critics nitpick little problems with the book instead of addressing the big issue: the recent revelation of Soviet Venona cables that show that Commie spies really had infiltrated the highest levels of U.S. government. If you can smash the Venona cables, you smash all the main arguments in Coulter's book. But of course they can't, so they focus on trivial errors.
20 posted on 10/19/2003 1:18:35 PM PDT by jwalburg (You're not moderate just because you know leftier leftists than yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson