Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Euthanasia is Auschwitz with a happy face. Coleman is absolutely dead right about it's tragic impact on the disabled population.

With medical care becoming increasingly socialized, each individual relies on someone who could truely care less about their welfare to pay the bill. Thus the selected application of euthanasia to high cost patients like the elderly, the insane or the physically disabled becomes the fiscal equivalent to a tax cut and tax cuts are very popular public policy.

Euthanasia supporters mostly mean well. They see terrible human suffering and want the pain stopped. They fail to notice the stealth bomber of human destruction that quietly flys over head after being fueled by their noble intentions.

1 posted on 10/17/2003 8:36:10 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM
I agree. Great article. I can't help but think of the pressure that would begin to force humble, elderly people to feel obligated to go for euthanasia if it ever became a choice. My grandma hated to be in the way. I can't imagine what her feelings of guilt would be if all this pressure were around, and it would be there on all elderly if euthanasia should become normalized.
2 posted on 10/17/2003 8:45:12 AM PDT by jwalburg (You're not moderate just because you know leftier leftists than yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
He subsequently wrote a book detailing the suffering caused by his becoming disabled in an auto accident — he was blind, mute, and quadriplegic — and urging that euthanasia be legalized.

If a blind, mute quadriplegic can write a book, then it would seem that his life is certainly worth living.

What is most interesting about cases like this is that they involved people who are not in a "persistent vegetative state" -- the usual "compassion" case used by the pro-euthanasia movement. The only thing "wrong" with this man was his disability. Which brings up an interesting question -- if a disabled person is considered a candidate for euthanasia under the law, can we at least be consistent in our approach and do away with the Americans with Disabilities Act?

3 posted on 10/17/2003 8:49:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
If one were to sit down today and compare the United States of 2003 to the world in the 1930s, he would find that we have far more in common with the Germany of the 1930s than the U.S. of that era.

"The only thing we learn from history is that we don't learn anything from history." -- Friedrich Hegel

4 posted on 10/17/2003 8:52:38 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
BUMP
5 posted on 10/17/2003 10:56:21 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
The cabbage truged up the grden path to the radish row and knocked on the door.

Mrs Radish came to the door and he told her " I have some bad news, your son was run over by the wheel barrow."

"Oh my goodness" she exclaimed "was he hurt badly?"

Cabbage replied, "Thr Dr thinks he'll survive, but he will always be a vegetable."
6 posted on 10/17/2003 11:01:44 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson