Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals love Limbaugh's pain
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10-13-03 | Barbara Simpson

Posted on 10/13/2003 1:42:22 AM PDT by ambrose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: ambrose
I have enjoyed listening to Rush Limbaugh for years. He is entertaining, and expresses most of my views in a very articulate manner. He is not my role model, however. If he is guilty of a criminal offense, he should be made responsible for it, under the same consideration or lack thereof, as anyone else under similar circumstances. He should not be made an example of. I do wish him well in his attempt at recovery from his addiction, and I hope to hear him back on the air soon. His mistake/crime/weakness is unfortunate, but it in no way reduces the truth he has articulated. That truth is dependent on no single person. I do enjoy watching the hypocrisy of the left as they, once again, show their lack of tolerance for anything but their own views. The left is crumbling, and the reaction of the left to Rush's troubles proves the point once again....
41 posted on 10/13/2003 5:14:42 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Beck_isright
"Some role model."

As far as I can tell Rush's message has always been one of personal responsibility, and now he is walking the walk. Makes for a good role model to me. He never, ever, suggested that addiction to pain killing drugs is a vitue that ought to be supported by the tax payers. That, too, makes for a good role model as far as conservatism goes.

It is precisely because of his status as a role model that Rush went to great lengths to keep his addiction away from public view, because no role model for conservatism would be consistent while publicly depending upon drugs.

Even in this case, Rush's addiction stems from medicinal, not recreational, use. This is a valid distinction. Conservatives ought to undertand there are a good many people of all stripes who suffer from addiction, and for each one there are probably six bureaucrats itching to start a new program for addicts of all kinds.

In short, the case for making this man a whipping boy is weak indeed.

42 posted on 10/13/2003 5:15:19 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: UncleJeff
and Rush apparently only decided he had a serious problem when it became public.

If Rush just decided now that he had a serious problem, then why did had he enterd clinics twice already to break the habit. So obviousely he realized long ago that he had a problem and was trying to break it

Laud him as a paragon of virtue if you please, but he's a hypocrite. The pills he's been gobbling ARE an "illegal drug" if you don't have a scrip, just like any other illegal drug.

How do you know he had gotten the pills illegally, just because the Enquirer says so? Rush said on Friday that much of what we heard and read about the story had inaccuracies and distortions. I believe Rush.

43 posted on 10/13/2003 5:20:25 AM PDT by Kaslin (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
This is a valid distinction.

If allegations be true then Rush knowingly and willingly violated the law in order to support his habit. If this a valid distinction, too?

44 posted on 10/13/2003 5:43:31 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This is personal and human, but it's being treated with ruthless cruelty by liberals, who not only hate what Limbaugh stands for but hate his very success.

It's not really Rush Limbaugh that they hate.

They hate his fans, who have evolved into a coherent political force loosely centered around Rush's radio persona.

It's the fact that Rush has been instrumental in their exposure and defeat that they hate.

45 posted on 10/13/2003 5:57:33 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
These are but a few examples of the liberal's expression of "compassion", "understanding" and "tolerance". But, as FReepers have said before, these attitudes are reserved by liberals only for those of the correct political persuasion.
46 posted on 10/13/2003 6:00:59 AM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
There are a series of stories on MSNBC this morning, linked with Newsweek, that are just out and out gloating and wallowing in Rush's setback. It throws any facade of objective journalism out the window.

The article calls Rush a "schlub", a loner, a couch potato, and hopelessly self-absorbed. The main article ends with the line "Limbaugh’s long-running act as a paragon of virtue is over."

Also linked in the story is Jonathan Alter's cocky opinion piece titled "Rush, to Judgment" with the tag line, "It’s been a bad year for bully-boy conservatives. Time for them to taste their own bitter medicine."

Speaking of bitter.

47 posted on 10/13/2003 6:18:34 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Hmmm, the type of name calling and ad hominem attacks you offer here show your true colors.

Best of luck to you, pal.
48 posted on 10/13/2003 6:42:40 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chouli
There are ways to handle cronic pain. Rush could have requested a morphine pump if the pain was that severe

Thats exactly right. He went outside the law and got caught. I think one of the main things he has to worry about now is whether he's lost any credibility with his audience; ignoring of course what the leftist media has to say.

49 posted on 10/13/2003 6:43:54 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
How do you know he had gotten the pills illegally, just because the Enquirer says so? Rush said on Friday that much of what we heard and read about the story had inaccuracies and distortions. I believe Rush.

And you expect Rush to come out on national radio and say he got pills illegally
His defense attorney would resign the next day
Innaccuracies and distortions doesn't mean the basic charge is incorrect
50 posted on 10/13/2003 6:45:08 AM PDT by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
In adversity, one finds out who your TRUE friends are. From all the vile remarks spewed forth by the pundits one wonders if our demise is very near at hand. This country, sad to say, has lost its direction. Slowly but surely our schools are indoctrinating the youth to a moral life that knows no boundaries. I applaud the teachers who still uphold the traditional teaching methods, but they are becoming a rarity,in many situations parents have chosen home schooling. It too, perhaps may be endangered, as the liberals would want to quash any semblance of educating our children, instilling in them the love of our country, that is contrary to the liberal agenda.... The only solution to the problem is to find your individual way to the Almighty. Life here on earth is so fleeting as is this grab for power. One must keep his eye on one's goal in life...Eternity with the Almighty, should always be that goal. Truer words have not been spoken.
51 posted on 10/13/2003 6:52:53 AM PDT by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
If allegations be true then Rush knowingly and willingly violated the law in order to support his habit. If this a valid distinction, too?

Yes. Distinctions in the law are necessary and commonplace. Mitigating circumstances are considered in all categories of crimes to determine the seriousness of the offense.

Here, taking medication for excrutiating back pain and taking the same drug for recreational purposes are distinguishable. If Rush procured the medication without a prescription (a point alleged, but not yet established), then that would be a crime, but it is still distinquishable from the crime committed by one who commits the same crime for purely recreational purposes. His pain may not be a justification under the law, but it would be a mitigating circumstance, and therefore distinguishable.

Even under the argument that both individuals commit the crime because they are addicted, the reason they became addicted still remains a mitigating factor -- not an excuse or justification, but a mitigation, and therefore a valid distinction.

52 posted on 10/13/2003 6:56:24 AM PDT by Tired_of_the_Lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
And your inability to recite facts, misquote me, and answer my posting directly displays your true liberal colors.
53 posted on 10/13/2003 7:00:33 AM PDT by Beck_isright (I'm Archie Bunker. Get my paper. Get my slippers. And shut up you hippy dope smoking piece of scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
That's a win for liberals. You can hear the laughing and gloating across the country and it's heard with a vengeance on liberal talk shows. As if professional jealousy isn't enough to engender the mountains of hate, they just love tearing conservatives apart when they find out they're human.

The Liberals are nothing but hypocrites

And with 20 million listeners .. Rush may be down .. but he is not out

54 posted on 10/13/2003 7:00:40 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I'm no liberal but yes, I am enjoying Rush's moment of pain. Oh, he'll outlive it I'm sure, and he'll probably even come out of it smelling like a rose. But it exposes one truism you can't overlook, all you Rush-bots out there who are so into this cult of personality you've lost your bearings: your hero is a junky, a flat-out addict no different from a guy shooting up on the street---he just happens to have more money and better access to drugs. So everytime one of you Dittoheads rails on about the War on Drugs, remember: your hero is a JUNKY. Your hero should be in jail, along with everyone else who ended up in the klink as a result of this insane War on Drugs. You've made your bed, you all . . . enjoy it.
55 posted on 10/13/2003 7:10:25 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Ignore Alien Orders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Rush's addiction stems from medicinal, not recreational, use. This is a valid distinction.

I agree. I think the route taken to addiction does matter. Taking pills for pain relief can get you accidentally addicted. This is different than the person who started taking them for recreational purposes. Though they both end up addicted, the latter was completely avoidable.

56 posted on 10/13/2003 7:14:19 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The Liberals are nothing but hypocrites

Limbaugh has been merciless over the years towards illegal drug users. So too, some of his defenders here. One must infer that either Rush and his 'bots are liberals, or some hypocritical members of his RINO personality cult.

Either way, it's especially hypocritical for hypocrites to whine and mewl about other hypocrites.

Go sob over a DU.

57 posted on 10/13/2003 7:14:23 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: chouli
Rush could have requested a morphine pump if the pain was that severe.

I don't see how this would prevent him from becoming addicted. Can't you get addicted to morphine in this form as well?

58 posted on 10/13/2003 7:18:08 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
Hope the Left enjoyed their weekend orgy of Rush bashing ... as the sun rises on Monday they are still wrong about EVERYTHING.
59 posted on 10/13/2003 7:19:27 AM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
The Newsweek piece, which I saw last night, was the worst thing yet. The writer was very good, but the inhumanity of it was just incredible.

Call someone a hypocrite if you want (a very dangerous word for any homo sapiens to fling around), disagree with his words or his decisions or his politics, but don't try to tear away his human face and throw salt on the scared, earthly little sinner that is inside us all.

We have all had low and worst moments. For anyone to gather them all together and say, "behold this wreck, everyone," --something that I never heard Rush Limbaugh do in 12 years -- is just nothing but inhuman.

That article was truly ghastly, like watching one of the Nazi doctors at work. Absolute cold-blooded hatred disguised as an intellectual pursuit. as It said much more about its author, and Newsweek, than it could ever say about Rush.

I look forward to hearing R.L. once again. He's an amazing man and no one can undo the good he's done.
60 posted on 10/13/2003 7:27:45 AM PDT by hemogoblin (The few, the proud, the 537.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson