Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals love Limbaugh's pain
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10-13-03 | Barbara Simpson

Posted on 10/13/2003 1:42:22 AM PDT by ambrose

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35050

Monday, October 13, 2003


THE BABE IN THE BUNKER Barbara Simpson


Liberals love Limbaugh's pain


Posted: October 13, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Barbara Simpson


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Liberals lost one and won one last week, leaving them crying and laughing.

They lost California to Arnold Schwarzenegger - a landslide in the recall election. That's the loss and the reason for anger, tears and political concern.

On the other hand, conservative talk host Rush Limbaugh told his listeners, as he signed-off on Friday, that he's addicted to prescription pain drugs.

That's a win for liberals. You can hear the laughing and gloating across the country and it's heard with a vengeance on liberal talk shows. As if professional jealousy isn't enough to engender the mountains of hate, they just love tearing conservatives apart when they find out they're human.

The media are acting like kids on a sugar binge. While liberal (read that Democrat) media hate that Arnold won the recall election, they secretly love it because, in their heart of hearts, they're celebrity whores and love the Hollywood glitterati. Arnold Schwarzenegger is nothing if not that, even though he's now governor.

But the Limbaugh situation is entirely different. This is personal and human, but it's being treated with ruthless cruelty by liberals, who not only hate what Limbaugh stands for but hate his very success. They detest that one individual, simply by doing a good job of articulating the conservative point of view, has been able to touch millions across the country. It galls them even more that he's No. 1 in ratings and got rich in the process. Oooh.

They smelled blood two weeks ago when racial sensitivity hit the fan with his observation on ESPN, a job he had for the main purpose of making observations about sports. He stepped in a politically correct pile by saying something evident. To avoid more controversy, he resigned.

Almost at the moment that story hit the headlines, another broke in Florida: His former housekeeper alleged she had provided Rush with painkillers without prescriptions. Limbaugh said he'd say nothing until he knew more about what was transpiring. Newspapers said an official investigation was ongoing.

Rush was torn apart for saying nothing, yet under the circumstances, it was exactly the correct thing to do. He said nothing until Friday when he took about four minutes of his program to tell listeners that he's addicted to prescription painkillers. He told of unsuccessful back-surgery several years ago, which left him with chronic pain and, now, two herniated discs. This is big-time pain.

Rather than risk further surgery - which can leave the patient worse or even paralyzed - he chose to take medicine prescribed by his physician. Along the way, he became addicted and said that he twice entered medical facilities to break the habit - to no avail.

His decision now is to take a month off to enter a 30-day treatment program to try to break the habit. He asked for listener support and their prayers.

So what does he get from the liberal media? Attacks. There's no sympathy for his medical ordeals. He's equated with street junkies and his addiction compared to guy in the alley mainlining heroin.

Yes, chemically, street drugs and prescription drugs are similar and yes, the effect of opiates on the body may be the same, but liberals just miss the point. Lots of points. Deliberately.

They won't cut him any slack because he's spoken out against use of illegal drugs. Sorry guys, there is no comparison. The people using illegal drugs do it for the high ? becoming a junkie is a built-in risk.

But liberals take it further: They want him thrown in jail. And, ON TOP OF THAT, it serves him right because he was outspoken about illegal drug use!

People in pain use prescriptions drugs to enable them to live as normally as possible. There's no high involved, just relief. They want the pain gone and the doctor can help.

Of course, there's an addiction risk. For heaven's sake, you can become addicted to over-the-counter cough medicine! That isn't the issue. For pain relief, the trick is balancing that with the point of addiction. Sometimes it doesn't work. But to excoriate Rush because he slipped over that line is monumentally cruel.

But liberals choose to be cruel, even if they sacrifice their own humanity. The same people who have compassion for the dregs of humanity on the street and for animals and insects cannot find an ounce of compassion for Rush.

And we know why. He committed the greatest sin: He's a conservative.


Barbara Simpson, "The Babe in the Bunker" as she's known to her KSFO 560 radio talk-show audience in San Francisco, has a 20-year radio, television and newspaper career in the Bay Area and Los Angeles.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: barbarasimpson; liberals; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: joesbucks
Because Rush's thoughts and pronouncements are heard not only by the faithful but the opposition, he set himself up for a fall if one happened. Yes it is terrible that it was began as something to relieve pain. But fact remains, he failed. He likely resorted to a criminal activity. It's no different than a man not of the means of Rush who breaks into or robs a pharmacy to steal these same substances under a similar condition because he no longer can afford to buy them from suppliers. Are we willing to be as soft on that man as we are suggesting we be with Rush? The need from the addiction is the same. The addiction was the result of proper medical care.

I wonder if Rush would have the compassion so many here are expressing or the outrage of those who have seen liberals pile on if the Alan Colmes had suffered the same series of events Rush has just gone through. Believe me, each time Colmes name was mentioned, Rush would satirically refer to or imply that Colmes's thoughts were the result of the haze produced from his addiction.

I concur with what you've said. Taking it a step further...Clinton was impeached...not because of his "private" sex life, but for purgery under oath. The dems all wanted to excuse it because his lying was "about sex". With Rush, regardless of WHY he used the medication (pain, addiction, etc.), he may very well have obtained the meds ILLEGALLY, and if so, that's a crime and cannot be excused or just "brushed under the carpet"--if Rush is ever to regain/retain his credibility. So he may have to face some very real, unintended consequences for his actions.

Also regarding Alan Colmes, I was listening to his radio show Friday night, and I must say that I was impressed with how he was handling Rush's situation. Colmes was most gracious, compassionate and very defending of Rush, because he views this as a medical problem (the addiction) vs. a criminal problem. Colmes was a class act on Friday if you ask me. He may be a bumling head liberal, but he is by no means anything like those vicous, salivating John Kerry/Bill Press/Al Franken scumbag-types!

61 posted on 10/13/2003 7:53:57 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hemogoblin
That article was truly ghastly, like watching one of the Nazi doctors at work. Absolute cold-blooded hatred disguised as an intellectual pursuit. as It said much more about its author, and Newsweek, than it could ever say about Rush.

Just like they treated/wrote about Linda Tripp. You'd have thought no living human being now or ever could possibly be as low, dirty, rotten pond scum as they implied that she was for taping the conversations of "a friend". They'll do no less -- they'll do even worse -- to Rush.

62 posted on 10/13/2003 8:00:38 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I guess it was just coincidental that he chose to enter rehab a few days after being "outed". And if his back was so bad I doubt he would spend much time golfing, incidentally. The Clintonesque excuses should be surprising, but sadly aren't.

If he had obtained all those pills legally he wouldn't have hired that high-powered lawyer to keep his hypocritical ass out of jail, or immediately started trying to mealy-mouth the whole thing. Anybody taking prescribed drugs can just say so and shut everybody up.

63 posted on 10/13/2003 8:34:45 AM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: evad
But, all that aside, what is Rush going to do for his pain AFTER he had been through the recovery program...or will the pain just go away?


You're the first I have seen to raise this important question that had been nagging at me.
65 posted on 10/13/2003 8:43:53 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: oopimrehs
"re: "The conservative movement is made up of individuals. It's this groupthink mentality that has created the RINOs and the "moderates". And the only moral leader in your life had best be yourself. Because only you can talk to your God, using others to do so for you is lazy and well, quite liberal."

Well said!"


Thank you. But the moderates and RINO's which have infested this board will never understand that.
66 posted on 10/13/2003 8:43:57 AM PDT by Beck_isright (I'm Archie Bunker. Get my paper. Get my slippers. And shut up you hippy dope smoking piece of scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
One must infer that either Rush and his 'bots are liberals,

I'm not a Rush Bot and I wasn't talking about Rush .. I was talking about the liberals

67 posted on 10/13/2003 8:44:18 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; joesbucks
He has frequently proclaimed himself to an excellent role model for the 'yout' of America. Some role model.

He also has said that your wife and daughter would be safe alone with him, an implied use of the phrase.

These are both semi-serious, faux-righteous throwaway lines designed to get a chuckle from his fans and to tick off those people who think he's being serious with them. Seeing you guys build your case, that Rush set himself up as a role model, upon these throwaway remarks is a little like seeing people get upset at Onion articles. I'll bet you'd have a tough time quoting or remembering specific instances where Rush set himself up as such, because I honestly don't think he's said those sorts of things in seriousness. It appears to me that a lot of the beating up on Rush is really a beating up on an imagined Rush, a charicature, a strawman.

68 posted on 10/13/2003 8:54:49 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Has el drugbo railed against speeders? No, but he says drug abusers who happen to be poor folks should go to jail
He is a hypocrite.

I think all drug addicts like el drugbo are scum.
69 posted on 10/13/2003 8:57:29 AM PDT by fortaydoos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fortaydoos
"There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up. "What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."

"We're going to let you destroy your life. We're going to make it easy and then all of us who accept the responsibilities of life and don't destroy our lives on drugs, we'll pay for whatever messes you get into."

Rush's quotes, my bolding.

70 posted on 10/13/2003 9:02:50 AM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
So would you say that Rush believes he is a bad role model?
71 posted on 10/13/2003 9:06:50 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"If allegations be true then Rush knowingly and willingly violated the law in order to support his habit. If this a valid distinction, too?

Present a distinction first, and I'll tell you whether it is valid or not. As it reads, you've only presented an allegation.

72 posted on 10/13/2003 9:20:53 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
So what else is a throw away line?
73 posted on 10/13/2003 10:28:49 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
You're right. My only fear is the "helping professions" are filled with hateful liberals. How low would they stoop with a vulnerable Rush - as he's going through withdrawal? They might put Uday to shame... I fear for Rush's well being.

If that's what constitutes a "win" for liberals, then we have NOTHING to worry about. We gain more and more political power by the day (California was one of their last governmental strangleholds), and they think complete victory is around the corner because a radio talk show host is going to be on vacation for a month, during which time the show will continue to be live every day with guest hosts.

74 posted on 10/13/2003 10:37:10 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
It's hard to say what Rush believes about his status as a role model because he's never really addressed the issue seriously (at least not that I can recall). And I'm fairly certain that he's never emphasized himself as a positive role model. If your argument hinges on Rush having set himself up as a positive role model, then I think your argument has a big weakness.

I see two possibilities -- 1) that Rush has set himself up as a positive role model, or 2) people have come to regard Rush as a role model. The first is an action of Rush, the second is an action of other people. Only if the first is true can Rush be considered a hypocrite (to the extent that being a hypocrite is dependent upon him having set himself up as a role model).

If your argument is that some people regard Rush as a role model and that some of them are suffering now that he's faltered, then you probably have a point -- but that point isn't really in dispute. The point that's in dispute is whether or not Rush is a hypocrite. I'm assuming that you think Rush is a hypocrite and that you're trying to prove that, but I think the "role model" argument fails because Rush never set himself up as a role model.


75 posted on 10/13/2003 10:59:17 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
ping!
76 posted on 10/13/2003 11:01:19 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rush Limbaugh: The Voice of Sanity during 8 years of the Clinton Reign of Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...

77 posted on 10/13/2003 11:17:37 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
You have to be able to discern these things. Some people know when they're reading an Onion article, some don't. Some know when Rush is being tongue-in-cheek, some don't.

But here's a tip: the stuff that Rush says right after the top of the hour and bottom of the hour breaks, when he's introducing the show or reintroducing the show to listeners who are just tuning in, is usually tongue-in-cheek. He'll say stuff like he's the all-caring, all-seeing Maja Rushie and that he's doing the show with half his brain tied behind his back, etc. This stuff is spoken in jest and in semi-seriousness. And it has been during these times that he has said that he can be trusted with daughters and wives and that he's the role model for all of America's yout and chilruns. This is him being mock-pompous. He does it to needle people who don't like him, who think he's being serious, and also as a mockery of the sort of arrogance that is so often ascribed to him by his critics.
78 posted on 10/13/2003 11:21:06 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
.. I was talking about the liberals

And I'm talking about RINO statists who insist on onerous punitive measures against tokers - those same statists whose heads are now spinning like tops as they try to rationalize Rush's addiction as being exempt from the WOD.

79 posted on 10/13/2003 11:25:57 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
What happened to liberals looking for the "root cause?" What happened to liberals seeing drug addict "victims" who need understanding and support from society? What happened to liberals demanding that people shouldn't be so "judgemental?"

-PJ

80 posted on 10/13/2003 11:33:04 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson