Skip to comments.
Wellstone's Ratings Under 50 Percent
FoxNews.com ^
| 6-28-02
| FoxNewsChannel
Posted on 06/28/2002 12:47:16 PM PDT by Salvation
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Minnesota; Campaign News; Parties; Polls; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: coleman; minnesota; seniors; wellstone
FYI
I did a search and did not find this exact story.
1
posted on
06/28/2002 12:47:16 PM PDT
by
Salvation
To: Salvation
Thanks for posting this.
Go Norm Go!
2
posted on
06/28/2002 7:21:32 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: Salvation
Among moderates, Wellstone leads 51 percent to Coleman's 35. Moderates for Wellstone?
To: Holden Magroin
Among moderates, Wellstone leads 51 percent to Coleman's 35. A "moderate", regardless of party affiliation, is simply a liberal who is too ignorant or gutless to admit that he (or she) really is a liberal. Practically every poll in recent years shows "moderates" revealing themselves as they scum they are when questions like this (Would you vote for Wellstone or Coleman? Did you vote for Bush or Gore?, etc.) are asked.
Remember, the majority of "moderates" voted for Bill Clinton - twice. Then again, Clinton was a "moderate" too, wasn't he? And so is Hitlery, of course. Yeah, they're ALL "moderates" over on the loony left......
The lefty wackos really believe that:
a. There is no "left" on the political spectrum,
b. The radical lefties are really "moderates", and
c. Everyone to the right of Hitlery is an arch-ultra-radical-Nazi-far-extreme-rightist.
This explains why people with 95% conservative ratings from the ACU (Jesse Helms) are labeled by liberals as "ultra"-conservative, while people with 95% liberal ratings from the ADA (John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, etc.) are laughably called "moderates".
DWG
To: Salvation
Here is in Illinois, DICK Durbin is one of the five incumbant 'RAT Senators (along with fellow commie Wellstone) polling under 50%. In other words, if all the "undecideds" go our way, these dopes are outta there.
Methinks the NRSC needs to reconsider their list of "vunerable" incumbants. Just because a state went to Bush or Gore in 2000 does not reflect how popular their currrent leaders are.
5
posted on
06/30/2002 4:15:04 AM PDT
by
BillyBoy
To: Salvation
We should remind the voters that Wellstone pledged to serve only two terms. Evidently he has become very fond of navy bean soup.
6
posted on
07/04/2002 10:35:25 PM PDT
by
MistrX
To: BillyBoy
The Torch is doing poorly as well. He doesn't have Corzine's $$$ to import homeless from Philly to vote for him.
I wonder why more NRSC $$$ isnt going to Montana? It would be a fairly inexpensive media buy state compared to Ill or NJ.
7
posted on
07/05/2002 4:46:53 AM PDT
by
CPT Clay
To: CPT Clay
In days past I have watched all of these pieces of $hit(Toresilly, Wellstone, Durbin, Harkin, etc )perform on television. They deserve to be defeated.
8
posted on
07/05/2002 4:47:35 PM PDT
by
RWCon
To: Holden Magroin
Since when was Wellstone a moderate? He's a pure left winger if I ever saw one...go get 'em Norm! Oh and by the way, thought Wellstone was term limiting himself...
9
posted on
07/05/2002 8:56:40 PM PDT
by
TatieBug
To: terilyn
Send Coleman $10.00
To: fred flinch
Ha! Already sent more than that.
Norm may not be the most conservative Senator that ever hit DC, but he WILL support President Bush's judicial nominees.
That's the end game IMHO.
11
posted on
07/06/2002 2:20:51 PM PDT
by
terilyn
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson