Good for Ted....and Rand....about the only two Senators I see saying much, in support of POTUS.
Nope. They will decline on enough states to hurt Trump’s chances.
This one is tee’d pretty good for SCOTUS so they may take it.
Demand Ted? Ok, I’ll bite... Or what?
so does this mean Ted is not one of the GOP that won due to fraud or was lobbied to like Mitch?
or is this just empty pandering because he doesnt think SCOTUS will take it
We need a lot more to get going on this.
Good for Ted.
It seems most of the Conservative Bloggers and Conservative News Media are looking for FRAUD.
FRAUD upon the voters in Pennsylvania is staring everybody in the face.
The Pennsylvania LEGISLATURE definitely knew that the words in ACT 77 were directly contrary to the words in the PA Constitution when the LEGISLATURE passed and sent it on to the Pennsylvania GOVERNOR for signature.
How many PA LEGISLATORS stood up and said: “I can’t vote for ACT 77 as it directly opposes the words in the PA Constitution?”
The Pennsylvania GOVERNOR definitely knew that the words in ACT 77 were directly contrary to the words in the PA Constitution when the GOVERNOR signed ACT 77 and put it into effect.
Did the PA GOVERNOR stand up and say: “I can’t sign ACT 77 as it directly opposes the words in the PA Constitution?”
We all know the answer. Both the LEGISLATURE and the GOVERNOR were silent because they were committing FRAUD upon the people in Pennsylvania.
Both the LEGISLATURE and the GOVERNOR violated their oath of office to uphold the Pennsylvania Constitution when they passed and signed ACT 77 in October 2019.
And the PA JUDICIARY is complicit in this FRAUD because they claim it is not their responsibility to take a look at the Constitutional validity of any new law.
Dred Scott looks down on our Supreme Court.
Will they go down in history as opposing this blatant attempt by the Democrats to make slaves of Americans by cheating in our election, or will their legacy be an endorsement of slavery?
The exact wording in "BushvGore".
Any appeal to SCOTUS would have to include enough states such that providing evidence sufficient to prove fraudulent ballots in those states would result in President Trump getting 270 or more electoral votes.
In trying to secure President Trump’s reelection it does no good to show the Demonicrats corrupted the election in just one state if those state electors are not sufficient to give the Electoral College majority to President Trump.
In case anyone wants to read the complaint.
The PA Constitution requires amendments to be approved by the voters. If mail-in voting is permitted to stand, imagine mail-in votes approving mail-in voting.
Or they just disregard the Constitution and don’t present the issue to the voters.
I hold out little to no hope SCOTUS will involve itself.
They have more or less become too damn comfortable in their powers for life.
Sigh. I recall telling someone that prior to the election the PA Supreme court told the Republicans they had no Standing because no one had been harmed. And after? They told them they waited too long.
At one time, I did hold out hope.
“Anyone here thinks SCOTUS will get involved?”
Nope
Kelly et al didn’t present any evidence in the State Courts on which the SC could overturn the result.
The founders viewed the SC as an apolitical body. Robert’s as well as the other Justices are very aware that supporting one political party without a record of evidence in the State Courts would undermine the legitimacy of the SC..this is a political question and their view will be the political process should work it out...
Is SCOTUS part of DC?
DC is enemy territory with very few USAians alive therein. Think about it, your national government is so evil there is _no_ chance lawful government can ever be restored.