Mine is cell physiology ... last century.
I would agree it is not impossible that anything from gravity waves to neutrinos or EMF of any wavelengths *might* be able to affect cell chemistry. It’s plausible. At high energies it IS demonstrable.
But ...
Following that logic, it might be harmful to sit next to your home fridge, or drive your electric car, or walk in sunlight, or .... on and on.
I think (?) my original point is one I will stick with: cell signals are not causing the COVID19 virus to be more or less invasive of a cell membrane. Neither of us has enough data to definitively argue this at the folded key protein interface level.
Enjoy your day. I will leave you the last word of you like.
But a helluva lot of people have a helluva lot of money invested in things, and they have been raised from birth not to care about even the possibility of side effects.
And on the other side, you have people who don't understand science at all, and fall for any quack, on specious arguments, that the sky is falling.
And, there's the issue that the body is far more complex than even the experts want to admit (remember when telomeres were dismissed as "junk DNA" with no purpose?)...
As well as the vested interests controlling the money for studies: look at the Gizmodo piece on Coronavirus, which quotes CHINESE studies showing hydroxychloroquine to be ineffective ...for late stage severe cases.
And the powers that be pushing very VERY hard on everything from universal vaccination to global warming.
I'd be less inclined to listen to the fearmongers, except for the identity of the people pressing so damn hard to FORCE 5G.
So I think some slow, careful, well-designed studies are in order.
Got a spare billion or so? ;-D
Why in hell did you condescendingly mention ionizing radiation as a refutation of claims on 5G?