Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maxine Waters: There's 'absolutely' enough evidence to draft articles of impeachment against Trump
Fox News ^ | September 27, 2019 | Joseph A. Wulfsohn

Posted on 09/27/2019 9:42:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said Thursday that Democrats "absolutely" have enough evidence to draft articles of impeachment against President Trump.

Watters told CNN "Cuomo Prime Time" anchor Chris Cuomo that she watched Trump "very closely" during the 2016 election and decided at the time that he had a "flawed character." She added that she thought Trump was "going to be a problem" and said he "turned out to be everything" that she suspected.

"Do you think you know enough at this point, congresswoman, to say there is enough here for articles of impeachment?" Cuomo asked.

"Absolutely," Waters quickly answered.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: California; Campaign News; Parties; U.S. Congress
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: caver

Well Max Waters, I plan to primary you next year....you are a worthless being.....


41 posted on 09/27/2019 10:53:59 AM PDT by mastertex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

Maxine and Ol’Hank Johnson...tween the two their IQ almost reaches 100.....LOL...

Oh no baby......you’re too generous. It wouldn’t add up to 10 between them........;)


42 posted on 09/27/2019 10:55:37 AM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wow, ABSOLUTE...that is a LOT of evidence. NO questions left. Maxine better find cover when the Democratic Coverup is blown.


43 posted on 09/27/2019 10:57:35 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_43rd_congressional_district

Maxine Waters is what I would call a BOUTIQUE politician. She has been carefully selected to provide what those in her district want - a liberal Democrat.

Her district has a majority of “minorities”, heavy on Hispanic which we have to assume more than a few here illegally.

So you have blacks who for a long time have voted Democrat combined with Hispanics who may believe life would be better under a Democrat.

She does not have to be a brilliant politician, her two man virtue to the party is 1) her race and 2) her gender.

She is the designated bomb thrower. Someone in a safe district that can be the attack dog and not have to worry about getting any push back regardless of what she says.

So only her age (in her 80) will get her out of office.


44 posted on 09/27/2019 11:15:05 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ok then what is it?

‘nPeach Fo’d Fi!


45 posted on 09/27/2019 11:16:03 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

OK Serious Question- how does a woman THIS STUPID keep getting re-elected?

Is the GOP ground game THAT bad???

Primary the crazy witch - Don’t they realize just a few dozen votes make all the difference in PRIMARIES???


46 posted on 09/27/2019 11:17:55 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"Is the GOP ground game THAT bad???"

Bush's.

47 posted on 09/27/2019 11:20:29 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Guys, she didn’t know banks did not do student loans.

I’m still laughing about that one.

And the banker who told her deserves an Oscar.


48 posted on 09/27/2019 11:25:30 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Then do it. I triple dog dare you!


49 posted on 09/27/2019 11:27:58 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Agonpeach! Agonpeach! Agonpeach! Agonpeach! Agonpeach!

As nauseating as 99% of all Dems are nowadays, this putrid stench is the most repellent of them all.


50 posted on 09/27/2019 11:36:59 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As with the alleged Russia collusion boondoggle, sh*t out the goshdamn PROOF/EVIDENCE already, kkthx you frakin’ Dem Progressives collective idiots!!!!!!!!!


51 posted on 09/27/2019 1:15:39 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe she can get more information from her banker friends, the ones she grilled about student loans until one of them shut her up by reminding her that Obama took over all student loans and that the bankers have nothing to do with them. I mean, she is the head of the Banking Committee, right?


52 posted on 09/27/2019 1:27:23 PM PDT by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
There's 'absolutely' enough evidence to draft articles of impeachment against Trump.

Those are the only words she knows.

53 posted on 09/27/2019 2:00:15 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill-googl,TWTR,FCBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antfa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

<>The President should let them get home, then declare an emergency session and force them all to come back and deal with this.<>

Excellent point! The President per Article II Section 3 may, “on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them . . . “

Convene the House! Force Pelosi to deal with the impeachy thing.


54 posted on 09/27/2019 2:13:26 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Okay, big mouth Maxine, list them! I want to see what you are going after. You have a very slim chance of getting an impeachment, let alone a removal from office. An impeachment without removal from office will be viewed as a waste of time amd will backfire on the democrats. People will look at the daily hacking at Trump from November 2016 and view it as mercenary when they vote in 2020. Just watch.


55 posted on 09/27/2019 2:35:53 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There’s absolutely enough evidence to put this bitter old leftist ‘in a Home’.

The difference with the ‘old days’ is : Ranting like this used to lead to the perp being quickly ‘out of office’.


56 posted on 09/27/2019 2:47:11 PM PDT by elbook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson