Well, I’ve ready plenty of stupid commentaries lately, but this one has got to be near the top of the list.
Idiot false stats on popularity used by an idiot from pollutionco.
Pollutico ......................
You’ve got a historically unpopular opponent in the White House.....
_________________________________________________
Yeah Right. Start off with a stupid lie like this. And the Rats will believe anything that follows.
...the president as a deeply dishonest, erratic, narcissistic, muslim-addicted bully.
Politico is a couple of years late.
You have to accept the premise of historically unpopular before going any further. The piece amounts to nothing more than a trite attempt for the writer to be able to say he predicted the outcome.
Never heard of the guy, had to look him up. Apparently a Bill Kristol/Romney type “conservative.”
His premise reflects the feelings of the Trump hating echo chamber, where shallow thinking and fake news shape the narrative.
I seriously doubt if any rat will heed the advice of a “conservative” albeit a traitorous one.
Sykes is that bozo from WI who worked overtime trying to defeat Trump in the WI primaries. When Cruz won, Sykes strutted around and crowed about how he had defeated Trump. He also worked to defeat Trump in the general election as well. I didn’t see him crowing about those results.
This dirtbag doesn’t deserve the clicks.
The first 2 paragraphs did me in. No slant here.
When you get past all the Bullshiite about how most the country hates Trump, it’s actually a pretty good read.
Starts off with a lie, Trump is not unpopular.
Charles Sykes? In high school we would have referred to him as having s**t for brains.
I know I’m a teen but if President Trump is so unpopular, why did he get 100,000+ people at an Orlando rally?
i’ve never seen so many lies in one article ...
Historically unpopular? Then why are his rallies so huge? When do the lies stop?
Polluted co.
Excellent satire!
Unpopular President? Really...?
Charlie is a never Trumper and a fake conservative.