Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary 2020? Trump better hope not.
The Washington Post ^ | October 24, 2017 | Michael Brenes

Posted on 10/24/2017 2:51:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

On Oct. 16, 11 months after defeating her, President Trump tweeted another of his regular insults about his 2016 opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton. Sandwiched between boasts about his presumed role in the stock market’s rise and his rally in South Carolina, Trump wrote: “I was recently asked if Crooked Hillary Clinton is going to run in 2020? My answer was, ‘I hope so!’”

Putting aside the reckless braggadocio — and blatant sexism — inherent in such a statement, the entire scenario seemed absurd. Most pundits (and most of the American public) discount the idea of Clinton running in 2020, doubtful she could win the Democratic nomination, let alone the election, after her stunning loss to Trump. Clinton herself has stated that her political career is over, that she is more interested in speaking out against Trump as a private citizen.

Nevertheless, Trump should be careful what he wishes for. Clinton might not be a potential candidate now, but the political winds can change quickly. Recent American history is rife with presidential contenders who lost the primary or general election and then went on to become a candidate in subsequent elections. Dissatisfied with the politics of the day, lured by name recognition and preexisting loyalties, the public gave each of these candidates multiple chances at the presidency and handed several the keys to the White House....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2020; hillary; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
All the evidence he gives (except the example of Richard Nixon) goes against his argument.

What is he saying? Hillary Clinton is like Richard Nixon, so nominate her?

He doesn't seem to understand that 2016 was Hillary's second chance -- her big comeback, comparable to Reagan's in 1980 -- and she blew it.

There are second chances in American politics.

An Al Smith, a Humphrey, a McCain, a Romney gets a second shot at the nomination after losing it once.

Nobody gets the nomination after losing the nomination twice.

Very few -- Clay, Bryan, Dewey, Stevenson -- get the nomination after losing the general election once.

Nobody, except Nixon, gets the presidency after already losing the general election once before.

But Hillary is like Nixon (at least to Michael Brenes).

81 posted on 10/24/2017 4:21:01 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Felonia runnin from Leavenworth? ...


82 posted on 10/24/2017 5:08:33 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth ( Freep u, Schmucky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Lol. Wobbly wicked witch.

Hey I have no respect for her. Absolutely no respect!


83 posted on 10/24/2017 5:45:49 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

The real joke is that her reptilian species only has a cloaca...no vagina in that thing.


84 posted on 10/24/2017 7:35:11 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

85 posted on 10/24/2017 10:53:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

So have we determined whether the broken toe is real or if it’s just an excuse for her to hobble around on a cane and provide cover for any future stumbles or need for assistance due to her “injury”?


86 posted on 10/25/2017 5:33:30 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...and blatant sexism...

Okay, now that insert deserves a footnote or asterisk or something. I need to have an explanation how Trump's statement is sexist.

PLEASE enlighten us Michael. Talk about a bizarre add-in. How did an editor not question this??? ...oh, it's the Washington Post.

87 posted on 10/25/2017 5:43:43 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Cid

I don’t know. The white guy is obviously appropriating their culture............................


88 posted on 10/25/2017 6:08:10 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton is not going to run in 2020. Wishful thinking on the Post’s part.


89 posted on 10/25/2017 6:12:16 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Re: 88

Thanks. I've seen that clip before, so I assumed the guy who 'photoshopped' himself into the original gif was well known. He remains a photobombing man of mystery.

90 posted on 10/25/2017 7:42:54 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson