Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does Obama Have on Comey?
Self

Posted on 07/06/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Everyone who knows anything about the way organized crime and the Democrats knows that Obama wouldn't appoint Comey to his position in 2012 with leverage.

What does Obama have on James Comey?


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Something I am sure, but I am not sure what.
1 posted on 07/06/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

It’s called “loyalty”.


2 posted on 07/06/2016 1:30:02 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Why does he have to “have something”? Why can’t Comey just be a scumbag? He’s a “Republican” who accepted a job from Obama after all, so he must be a scumbag.


3 posted on 07/06/2016 1:31:55 PM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Comey being a Republican is precisely why Obama nominated him. Can’t blame partisan politics, plus can’t blame when the lever needs to be turned.


4 posted on 07/06/2016 1:33:29 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Maybe there’s something in the vanity posted about 90 minutes ago (and still on the front page) asking the same question?


5 posted on 07/06/2016 1:34:04 PM PDT by Darth Reardon (Would I lie to you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

He knew, based on Comey’s treatment of Scooter Libby, that he was a RINO at heart.


6 posted on 07/06/2016 1:34:09 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines (#nevertrump is really #readyforhillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

It may turn out to be the best move possible. If he had recommended indictments, they would have just ignored them. It gives Trump fodder for the general election run up. When Trump becomes President he can revisit the case, and he will.


7 posted on 07/06/2016 1:35:08 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

“If he had recommended indictments, they would have just ignored them.”

Man, please pass me whatever you are having so that I can feel equally good about this.


8 posted on 07/06/2016 1:36:13 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

The NSA.


9 posted on 07/06/2016 1:36:43 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

The only thing that comes to mind, is “FEAR”

Think about it...

Obama and the democrats, all sold Comey on the fear factor. The fear factor being that, if he recommended bringing charges to Hillary, that Hillary’s campaign would be forced to end, and if that happened, that Comey would be accused of bringing down the democrats’ presidential candidate, and would furthermore be accused of deciding the election by leaving the door wide open for an easy victory by Trump against whoever replaced Hillary as the candidate.

Being forever known as the person who brought down Hillary and the democrats’ only hope to win the presidency, and the democrats were not going to let Comey get away with it.


10 posted on 07/06/2016 1:37:37 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

DUI with fatality where he skated?
Drunken frat-house shower orgy?
He’s secretly a wife beater?
Probably what DiGenova said on Ingraham this morning: He’s been covering up gross malfeasance at the El Paso RA.

Then there are the NM allegations about corrupt cops being used as paid-perjurers and bagmen by corrupt FBI agents, with full knowledge at the agency level.

Point is, it’s obvious that Comey is “owned” by Obama/Clinton. They could have had him recite from the Koran or Mein Kampf, and he would have.


11 posted on 07/06/2016 1:37:40 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar
"It may turn out to be the best move possible. If he had recommended indictments, they would have just ignored them. "

Reminds me of this:


12 posted on 07/06/2016 1:39:04 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

He was picked by obama for the job right? So he has nothing on him. He is just as corrupt as obama.


13 posted on 07/06/2016 1:41:04 PM PDT by ColdOne (poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This crap again? Comey is a gutless inside the beltway scumbag. End of story


14 posted on 07/06/2016 1:41:33 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Post #1 :
‘Something I am sure, but I am not sure what.’

I have long been suspicious of Director Comey; as he was an Obamatollah appointee, but I’d like to believe he still is an honorable patriot...

Could it be possible that he outsmarted/outplayed The Bitch?

Interesting times in the U.S.A. ~ Director Comey may have an ‘ace up his sleeve’ ~ and hopefully President Trump may be the one to put those criminals behind bars...

‘scuse my optimism and naiveté ~ I believe there is still hope!


15 posted on 07/06/2016 1:41:34 PM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

By the way when do the mass resignations start? Guess what that was another lie


16 posted on 07/06/2016 1:42:51 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

comey has selective integrity. The Rule of Law has once again been bashed by a degenerate whose integrity is malignant...at best. The compromised comey should resign immediately. He does not merit his position.


17 posted on 07/06/2016 1:43:47 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

I think when the FBI discovered that Obama was included on the SAP messages email chain along with possibly other high ranking administration officials that it was decided to bury the investigation.

Can you imagine the damage that this would have caused? (I know Freepers can) Bring down the president, and possibly future president, probably the SECDEF, and the directors of the CIA and NSA.


18 posted on 07/06/2016 1:44:07 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

As I reflected on Comey’s comments on Tuesday, it struck me that he may be more clever than we thought.  His first 15+ minutes are loaded with 30 second sound bites Trump is already making into TV spots. Comey very politely called her everything but a child of God and now it’s ALL OUT THERE from the head of the FBI!

Then by NOT referring it, he has all but the most dedicated Clinton loyalists and brain-dead Democrats (but I again repeat myself) so FURIOUS at the failure to follow through that I believe the election may be an anticlimax — unless Trump steps on his ______________
(insert the name of your favorite body part here) or they STEAL another one.

So, if he DID get “The Word” from obozo to keep Clinton in the race (and my guess is that he did), his presentation was constructed to do as much damage to her while following obama’s order to NOT refer for prosecution, leaving him out of the doghouse. Perhaps some sort of spiteful twofer? We may never know!


19 posted on 07/06/2016 1:46:06 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

I’m not so sure that people are correctly reading what happened yesterday.

First, he spent most of the speech confirming that the FBI believes that she lied her (very fat) ass off throughout this entire episode. Second, he indicated that she DID break the law.

What deciding not to recommend an indictment did is:

1) It made sure that she’d be the Dem nominee;
2) It made sure that she won’t be going to jail (not yet);
3) It brought this entire series of sordid episodes into the public eye - most people are asleep and didn’t even know that she was being investigated.
4) It gave Trump lots of material for commercials.

Her being the Dem nominee is, of course, important to her. However, she is a terrible candidate. Having her be the nominee, doubling down on Obama policies, with this cloud of ethics and competence hanging over her...that doesn’t bode well for ANY candidate, let alone one running as THE establishment candidate in an anti-establishment year.

Remember, this is DC and this is politics - take NOTHING at face value.


20 posted on 07/06/2016 1:46:09 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson