Posted on 04/26/2016 6:05:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
If you only considered crowd size at rallies for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, you might wonder how Clinton has won so many big states. Sanders draws massive, enthusiastic crowds, while Clinton's rallies often seem tiny and subdued by comparison.
Monday night, the eve of five East Coast primaries taking place today, Sanders spoke to an overflow crowd — 3,200 people in total — at Drexel University in Philadelphia. His audience was more than double the crowd that showed up to hear Hillary Clinton speak at Philadelphia's city hall.
On Sunday, 14,000 were there for Sanders in New Haven, Conn.
6,600 in Baltimore, Md., on Saturday.
And 27,000 people came to hear Sanders in Manhattan's Washington Square Park a week before New York's crucial primary.
(TWEET-AT-LINK)
But Sanders went on to lose that state by 16 points. His big crowds haven't translated into the kind of wins needed to lock down the nomination. Why?
The Enthusiasm Gap May Be An Optical Illusion
Since last summer, when Sanders' huge rallies got him noticed by the national media, there's been a lot of discussion of an "enthusiasm gap" between Sanders and Clinton.
But in a recent Gallup poll, it was Clinton, not Sanders, who had the lead in enthusiasm among supporters. Fifty-four percent of Clinton supporters said they were "extremely" or "very enthusiastic" about their candidate, compared to 44 percent of Sanders' supporters.
It may be Clinton supporters are just less vocal, less likely to spend hours on social media praising their candidate or to show up at a concert-style rally (Clinton's campaign has also shied away from planning large events).
Crowd Size Simply Isn't A Predictor Of Winning
If big crowds meant big wins at the polls, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and former Texas Rep. Ron Paul would both be president. But election after election, crowd size has been an unreliable predictor of winning.
"The people at the rally are not a random or representative sample of the electorate," says Lynn Vavreck, a professor of political science and communication studies at University of California, Los Angeles. "These are strategic and well-planned events. This isn't just happening."
Rallies are designed to look like spontaneous displays of excitement for a candidate, but they are planned right down to picking a venue that will overflow rather than look half-empty.
Early on, when Sanders was only polling single digits and big crowds started showing up, they were seen as proof of the appeal of his insurgent message. Now that Sanders is well-known, the rallies give his supporters a feeling that they are part of a movement, something larger than themselves.
A Sanders adviser says the events, which Sanders insists on calling "meetings," play to the candidate's strengths and energize the campaign in cities where the rallies take place.
Vavreck went to a Sanders rally and she was impressed with the event.
"I had to put my fingers in my ears because there was so much screaming," says Vavreck. "It was, you know, like a One Direction [boy band] concert or something. So I think all of that is real. But it doesn't necessarily translate into more votes than the opposition."
So far, Hillary Clinton has received 2.7 million more votes nationwide than Sanders and leads significantly in pledged delegates.
Like The Grateful Dead or Phish
Howard Dean has endorsed Clinton rather than Sanders. But in 2004, he was the insurgent Democratic presidential candidate getting attention with big crowds. He ultimately came in third place in Iowa and his campaign fizzled.
Dean offers a couple of theories about what causes the disconnect. For one thing, when he was campaigning in Iowa back in 2003, he started to notice the same faces from event to event. He thinks that is happening with Sanders.
"Some of the crowd size is people who come because they love Bernie and they want to hear this message and it invigorates them and they keep doing it and they follow him around just like [fans of] the Grateful Dead or Phish."
'You Have To Build A Coalition'
Dean says there's a deeper issue than numbers. Eventually the insurgent candidate needs to go from playing the role of agitating outsider to someone voters of all stripes can see as president.
"And I couldn't change. And I knew I had to. But the crowd pulls you back," says Dean. "They're dying for you. They're bleeding for you. And it's very hard to do."
Dean says he sees Republican Donald Trump publicly struggling with it. And he says Sanders likely is, too. A speech with applause lines all your supporters can recite back makes for an amazing rally.
"But it's also the thing that isolates you at the end, because you have to build a coalition," adds Dean.
Put another way: big crowds aren't the same thing as a winning coalition.
BREAKING: Ted Cruz Gets SCHLONGED in Epic Fashion – Gets Destroyed in 5 States
http://truthfeed.com/?p=643
Uh, Socialism has NEVER worked anywhere?
Because except for the people who show up at his rallies, few people believe that socialism will do anything except make things worse.
Truthfeed is a very far left site. How appropriate.
Blaming Cruz because Trump is too lazy and cheap to hire the people to win over unaffiliated delegates is just like Trump, cheap and lazy.
Some people say the system is rigged.
It takes a lot of college kids to outpoll all the dead voters in the big cities
Sanders might draw huge crowds compared to Hillary, but overall Democrat turnout is down by about 20 percent compared to 2008 and 2012. Plus, he is up against the Clinton machine, and 0bama voters are coming out for Hillary, whereas Bernie is mainly drawing white people who are must another minority group in the democrat party.
I’m blaming Cruz for giving Trump the ammunition Trump used to kill him. That’s what happened. We are witnessing Cruz’s political suicide.
Because the men are there to pick up easy Bernie chicks not vote
LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Primary Night Press Conference (4-25-16) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov2F4Z0G0BU
16K on the stream and it hasn’t even started yet!
Reminds me of an old saying about the Boston Bruin back in the 70s when they sold out the old Boston Garden. “The Bruins have 15000 fans, and the go to every game”
Bernie Sanders is the freak show of Marxists. Those who came to see the freak are commies, Marxists, progressives (the same thing), liberals (pre-Marxists in training), curious, and just plain stupid.
Those who came to see Hillary know that she is a commie, a psychopathic liar, a crook, unethical, immoral, a cuckholded wife, a fraud re the “war on women”, a Bitch, and Witch of the Year. That’s why they like her.
Because Bernie is a novelty for people to say they went to a Sanders rally. It started out that way for Trump, but Trump’ actually has supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.