Posted on 03/29/2016 6:55:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Donald Trump has made his first threat to sue over the procedures for selecting delegates to the Republican convention. It surely wont be his last.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Ted Cruz may come out of Louisiana with as many as ten more delegates than Trump, even though the mogul narrowly beat Cruz in the popular vote there. In a tweet, Trump pronounced it unfair, and worthy of litigation.
The Louisiana delegate picture isnt evidence of anything untoward. Trump and Cruz both won 18 delegates on election night. Marco Rubio, since dropped out, won five, and another five are uncommitted. The Cruz campaign has done the nitty-gritty work to see that those delegates are likely Cruz supporters.
The only scandal here is that the Cruz campaign, built on grass-roots organizing muscle, knows the process and is working hard for every advantage. Trumps plaint is a little like showing up at a cricket match and crying foul because the opposing team knows the rules and all you know is that you swing a bat.
The Louisiana flap is a window into the intricate, state-by-state process of picking delegates to a convention in Cleveland where the allegiance of every last delegate might matter. If there is an open convention, Trump will argue that the voters should rule, not delegates no one has heard of, selected at obscure precinct, county, district, and state meetings. He will, in short, declare the entire exercise of a contested convention illegitimate.
Is it? We are used to the voters directly deciding, and should Trump perform strongly enough to win a majority of delegates, 1,237, they, in effect, will. But if he falls short, the delegates enter the picture.
The requirement for a majority of delegates (Trump once decried this rule as arbitrary) is meant to ensure that the nominee is, as much as possible, the consensus choice of the party. Ordinarily, this isnt an issue the early leader in a nomination fight vanquishes the opposition and steadily consolidates the support of the party.
In 2012, Mitt Romney didnt lose a contest after March 24. His closest competitor, Rick Santorum, dropped out shortly after losing Wisconsin on April 3, and after that, Romney was racking up victories with 60 percent of the vote or more.
For Trump who spent last week threatening and mocking Ted Cruzs wife this unifying march down the homestretch is hard to imagine. If Trump has only won a plurality of delegates, it wont be a sign of strength, but of weakness. A badly divided party would be nominating a candidate who couldnt reach a majority and, so far, has shown no general-election appeal. In this circumstance, delegates would be justified in looking to someone else better suited to win an election and protect the partys interests.
Its not unheard of for top vote-getters in America to fall short of the top prize. Otherwise, there would have been a Gore administration. Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000, but still fell short of George W. Bush, who won the Electoral College.
If you count Michigan, where Barack Obamas name didnt appear on the ballot, Hillary Clinton very narrowly won the most votes in the 2008 primaries. That was good enough for an appointment as secretary of state under President Obama, who understood the delegate-allocation rules much better.
Trump has thrived so far without an extensive, traditional political operation. But politics isnt only about TV interviews and big rallies. There is a reason that the system also rewards candidates who can motivate and muster people to do the grass-roots activism involved in winning small victories at local meetings. This is literally getting people involved in the process, and it could take on an outsized significance in deciding the immediate future of the Republican Party.
Trump would be well-served to complain less about the rules, and learn more.
Why do they needs Voters ?
I would just as soon ben from free republic any National Review stories........
So why bother with primary elections? Save all the time and money and go straight to the convention.
Correction: I would just as soon ban from Free Republic any National Review stories..............but I know we can not do that
Actually, there are no rules. The 1237 thing is what people talk about, but based on the desired outcome, that number can be either higher or lower. Outcome first, then they find a procedure that gets them where they’ve decided to go.
If you also ban Conservative Treehouse.
No way millions of voters will show up to support an 'assigned' nominee.
The other problem is that Trump & Cruz are being so damaged by this process, it's going to be a tough road anyways.
Well America. Just stay home on election day, you are not needed.
They only let you vote to amuse you.
I can hear Jeb now: “I love the smell of smoke-filled rooms in the morning”
Ted could be out by April 3, depending on what twitter digs up in the next 48 hours.
The delegates need to look at an electoral map and see who can beat Hillary.
Cruz can’t.
Won't be Jeb. Even the GOPe isn't that tone deaf. They'll hand it to someone they can delude themselves won't be absolutely hated by the base. As far as the GOPe is concerned Paul Ryan is a staunch conservative Tea Party candidate. Therefore he's an acceptable compromise candidate. They have no idea, but that's a sample of their reasoning.
Twitter? Hahahahaha!
I thought 3rd was that sweet spot this year...
Seems like it has been since IA.
Because we live in a republic, not a democracy.
We elect representatives to make decisions that we do not have full information on at the time we cast our ballots. In the case of primary elections, voters in the early states didn’t know which of the 17 candidates would be left at this stage of the race. So the delegates of the candidates who have dropped out have now have to decide which of the remaining candidates best represent their constituents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.