Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz: 'Under no circumstances' will I run for majority leader
The Hill ^ | November 5, 2014 | Peter Sullivan

Posted on 11/08/2014 1:29:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Eddie01

I see what you’re saying, but a guy has got to pay the bills. Did you consider that he’s doing those ads because after his run Hollywood blackballed him and he’s not getting jobs. Just something to think about.

CC


21 posted on 11/08/2014 2:11:56 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (sufficient unto the day are the troubles therof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

There is nothing illegitimate about reverse mortgages or about acting.


22 posted on 11/08/2014 2:13:55 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jy8z

This may be somewhat confusing, but it does address the issue.

I believe a reading of this will confirm that a majority leader can choose to simply not bring a bill to the floor for a vote.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/aug/06/lynn-jenkins/rep-lynn-jenkins-blames-harry-reid-do-nothing-sena/


23 posted on 11/08/2014 2:14:32 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The mid-term elections were perfect for him. Now Obama can really lead from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He wants to be free to run for President, which he could not do as Majority Leader.


24 posted on 11/08/2014 2:14:55 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I have no problem with Fred’s acting. I rather liked his roles.

However, reverse mortgages are a bad deal for the homeowner, which is why there’s so much advertising for them. If you’d like to discuss the financial issues, I’d be happy to do so.


25 posted on 11/08/2014 2:15:30 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

Beats viagra commercials.


26 posted on 11/08/2014 2:23:20 PM PST by antidisestablishment (When the passion of your convictions surpass those of your leader, it's past time for a change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

They may not be a good deal for you, but in a free market neither you nor I should be able to force our opinions on others.


27 posted on 11/08/2014 2:23:35 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I’m not forcing my opinion on anyone—I didn’t say that reverse mortgages should be forbidden. Nor did I say that Fred should be forbidden from making commercials for them.

What I did say is that his doing so diminishes his status in my eyes. Maybe you don’t mind.


28 posted on 11/08/2014 2:26:10 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
None the less, I believe the majority leader can block bills from coming to a vote.

What I would like to understand is where does he get that authority from. Is it House/Senate rules? Decide by whom? How can that be changed? These people have totally forgot that they need to do what we the people have put them there to do.
29 posted on 11/08/2014 2:38:55 PM PST by jy8z (When push comes disguised as nudge, I do not budge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
?
30 posted on 11/08/2014 2:43:14 PM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

smart move


31 posted on 11/08/2014 3:01:44 PM PST by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He’s a smart guy. Why cause immediate disunity within the Party when there’s work to do?


32 posted on 11/08/2014 3:05:49 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

he would get about 4 votes in the Senate on a good day


33 posted on 11/08/2014 3:11:37 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Have you ever been a loan originator/officer? Are you familiar with what a reverse mortgage actually is?


34 posted on 11/08/2014 3:46:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sounds to me like some back door goings on with the RNC bosses. Will he be a real candidate in 2016 or a sacrificial lamb to make Jeb “act of love” Bush look like a moderate for the unwashed squishy middle.


35 posted on 11/08/2014 4:34:51 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I think Sessions would be great in that position.


36 posted on 11/08/2014 4:56:50 PM PST by Jemian (War Eagle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
However, reverse mortgages are a bad deal for the homeowner, which is why there’s so much advertising for them. If you’d like to discuss the financial issues, I’d be happy to do so.

I have zero debt, and 100% home equity and recently did a reverse mortgage.

I get over $1,500/month, tax free, which means I can take $1,500/month less from my 401K which saves me about $ 3,000 a year income tax.

My 401K will last longer, my income stays the same, and I save taxes, I retain home ownership, and the monthly income last as long as I live in this house.

How is that a "bad deal"?

37 posted on 11/08/2014 5:00:09 PM PST by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
I could support that. ;)

/johnny

38 posted on 11/08/2014 5:00:28 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good! Let Cruz stand behind Boehner... very closely, so he can watch every move he makes, and every breath he exhales is felt on his neck.


39 posted on 11/08/2014 5:03:04 PM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

Thompson would have made a great President. Not a Reagan, but nevertheless a top tier leader. We would have few problems overseas with him at the helm, and the economy would be a whole lot better.

Certainly better than McStain or Romney, let alone the Communist Moslem and his freak show of a cabinet


40 posted on 11/08/2014 5:20:06 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson