Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

I have no problem with Fred’s acting. I rather liked his roles.

However, reverse mortgages are a bad deal for the homeowner, which is why there’s so much advertising for them. If you’d like to discuss the financial issues, I’d be happy to do so.


25 posted on 11/08/2014 2:15:30 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

They may not be a good deal for you, but in a free market neither you nor I should be able to force our opinions on others.


27 posted on 11/08/2014 2:23:35 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine
However, reverse mortgages are a bad deal for the homeowner, which is why there’s so much advertising for them. If you’d like to discuss the financial issues, I’d be happy to do so.

I have zero debt, and 100% home equity and recently did a reverse mortgage.

I get over $1,500/month, tax free, which means I can take $1,500/month less from my 401K which saves me about $ 3,000 a year income tax.

My 401K will last longer, my income stays the same, and I save taxes, I retain home ownership, and the monthly income last as long as I live in this house.

How is that a "bad deal"?

37 posted on 11/08/2014 5:00:09 PM PST by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson