Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist Richard Tisei for Congress
MassResistance.org ^ | October 14, 2012 | Unknown

Posted on 10/14/2012 12:43:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: SoConPubbie

This is definitely a sign of things to come in the GOP.

If Romney wins, — which of course would be a happy change from Obama, — the GOP will take it as an object lesson that centrism (defined as socially liberal fiscally restrained opportunism) wins generally. Expect more queers come out of the woodwork and be enthusiastically supported by the GOP.


41 posted on 10/14/2012 8:00:28 PM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Romney and Ryan have both said they are fine with a sodomized military and will do nothing to change it.
Of course, Mitt has always been a homo hugger.


42 posted on 10/14/2012 8:07:29 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

Did you ever stop to consider that there are freaky people in any large group? Somewhere between 5-10% of the population is probably gay or at least bisexual. Ironically, it would probably be lower than that but, a certain segment of the people are gay simply because they enjoy annoying the hell out of people like you.

My advice is to vote against gay marriage and tone down your over-the-top warnings. I'm as heterosexual and as conservative as you, but, I also have both lesbian and gay friends. And even though they are mostly liberal and we debate constantly over their political naivete, I consider them all to be good people. You can be nice...really you can.

43 posted on 10/14/2012 8:16:16 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So they want to evict 70% of the party because it is without a doubt that a supermajority of GOP are conservative on abortion and ssm. That is why the GOP is the stupid party. I had some idiot say we needed a firewall in places like MA? Really how does that work when we have some media darling GOP who is as likely to vote with liberal Dems as they are conservative GOP? Scott Brown has been a real disappointment. He could’ve led the way for a conservative awakening in MA but he chose not to lead.

See the left knows that coexisting won’t get them what they want which is why they actively try to force their beliefs on us or if not us our children. We had better realize that this isn’t a game where we can just split the difference and all will be well. What we see culturally and fiscally is the result of that attitude. We need to cling to our idelogical positions and sell them or we will find ourselves an endangered species.


44 posted on 10/14/2012 8:18:21 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Now lets return to our regular scheduled deprogramming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

Apparently, you are either not a Christian, or one who has not read the Bible much.

This site, as declared by Jim Robinson, it's owner and founder, is "As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty. "

God, through his Apostle Paul, defines the sin of Homosexuality as follows:

Romans 1:18-32

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Your argument isn't with me, where Homosexuality is concerned, it's with your Heavenly Father.

He defines Homosexuality as evil; there is not compromise with evil.

You'll have to decide which side you are on.

45 posted on 10/14/2012 9:42:48 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Your post describes you far better than it describes God-fearing Christians. God said sodomy was an abomination and He destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of their perversion. Think He forgot what He declared. Some of US know full well this nation has been blessed and protected and some of US would like to continue receiving those blessings and protection.

There is nothing gay about these perverts. They know it and they have NO shame. They are mentally unstable. Oh, there will be no sodomy in heaven.

46 posted on 10/14/2012 9:57:59 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Please help Todd Akin defeat Claire and the GOP-e send money!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist

but they and Willard cut off Conservatives like Akin


47 posted on 10/15/2012 1:03:41 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Look, I understand social conservatives we need to work with people who agree with us on national defense issues or fiscal issues.

Please try to understand that, from our perspective, homosexuality really **IS** a threat to civilization.

If you don't agree, I understand. Libertarianism proceeds from different principles than those which I hold, and while I can work with libertarians I understand we have different foundations for our beliefs which lead us to share many but not all of the same beliefs.

But please understand that I disagree, and disagree strongly, that homosexuality needs to be accepted as somebody’s personal choice.

48 posted on 10/15/2012 6:16:28 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The only recourse would be to vote for the demrat. Coprophiles should not be given power regardless of party or whatever boys organization they infiltrate.


49 posted on 10/15/2012 6:51:03 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; ...

Coprophiles should not be given power under any circumstance. You simply vote Demrat in this case.


50 posted on 10/15/2012 6:55:40 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

It’s hard to believe, but Tisei is not the worst RINO running for Congress. That honor belongs to Tom Tierney (no relation I know of to Tisei’s opponent). This guy’s platform is wealth redistribution. Source - Malden Observer. He’s running against Ed Markey. If you are in Markey’s district, blank the ballot for Congressman.


51 posted on 10/15/2012 10:36:14 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pedro45

Tisei may win because Tierney is so tarnished. But Katherine Clark will trounce him in 2014.


52 posted on 10/15/2012 10:39:37 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; All

After the election, it’s go time on taking out the Republican party as a party.

If Mr. Romney is elected, he NEEDS to feel more pressure than he ever dreamed of from the right.

The Republican party needs to be elected out of existence; one at a time in municipal and state elections.

A real conservative movement needs to start.


53 posted on 10/15/2012 10:47:23 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The problem is that conservatives have become a minority in this nation. Unfortunately, Christians too.

We don’t just need to take over the party. The nation itself needs to be ‘taken back.’


54 posted on 10/15/2012 12:45:44 PM PDT by Luircin (Don't like Romney? Blame the conservative circular firing squad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Ping


55 posted on 10/15/2012 1:34:31 PM PDT by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church in protecting our culture from perversion is ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

This is one of the main reasons I am no longer a Republican.


56 posted on 10/16/2012 8:33:35 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

If you are going to espouse the absurd logic which premises the leftist meme of homophobia why not just come out of the closet and use the word homophobia?

As far as "gay people" -what actually defines this class of "gay people" you believe exists? Is there any scientific objective evidence to support your claim?

I would suggest that it is not some supposed people you think you nobly defend here but rather it is deviant and intrinsically self destructive sexual practices you defend. Is eating feces really as noble and socially redeeming as you seem to believe it is? -I think not!

57 posted on 10/16/2012 11:53:29 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Dude, that last line of your was just bizzare. You have way too much time on your hands.

In any case, I’m a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. I don’t give a crap what people do with their lives as long as they pay for it with their own money and they don’t hurt anyone. I agree with you that some of peoples choices are offensive but, no one in this country (including you or me) has the right to never be offended.

My advice to you is to live the way you want to live and let others do the same.


58 posted on 10/17/2012 5:02:17 AM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

Homosexuality is a threat to civilization:

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

“I’m as heterosexual and as conservative as you, but, I also have both lesbian and gay friends. And even though they are mostly liberal and we debate constantly over their political naivete, I consider them all to be good people.”

You’ve been had. Your social liberalism is being taken advantage of.


59 posted on 10/17/2012 7:45:53 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
In any case, I’m a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian.

REGARDLESS you conveniently ignore the fiscal reality of what homosexual sex normalcy promotion by government power costs taxpayers maybe you should stick with fiscal issues only on FR and save your acceptance and or promotion of homosexual sex normalcy for DU?

60 posted on 10/17/2012 11:28:53 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson