Can we vote it out here Freepers? Newt/Mitt/Rick/Michele?

[Milagros]

I vote for Newt!

---

* Newt Gingrich?

* Mitt Romney?

* Rick Perry?

* Michele Bachmann?

* Rick Santorum?

* Jon Huntsman?

[MNJohnnie]

Ron Paul. the only one left that recognizes Government is the problem not the solution.

[fieldmarshaldj]

NONE OF THE ABOVE !

[potlatch]

Governor Rick Perry

[09Patriot]

Paul or none of the above

[edzo4]

so then I might as well just give up now because the outcome is inevitable right? good thing we didn’t have the attitude when we landed at normandy that if we didnt take france all at once we might as well not even try...
the left has gotten where they are inch by inch and if we have to push it back inch by inch I am willing to fight, I am not going to be a spoiled brat and not participate if I dont get everything I want all at once

[SharpRightTurn]

Michele.

[Captain Steve]

IMHO...

1 Michele Bachmann
2 Rick Santorum

agree. . .i might have been for newt except he supported TARP, single payer, and global warming.

[mjp]

Michele Bachmann

[joe fonebone]

Here is the way I see it...

mcromney... communist lite

mcgrinchrich... socialist lite

mcperry... the bushes 4th term

bachman... mcromneys puppet

ron paul... enough said

santorum... who?????

huntsman... more of a lib than fubo

with this in mind, daffy duck gets my vote... the tea party gets the house and senate votes from me..

[tacticalogic]

so then I might as well just give up now because the outcome is inevitable right? good thing we didn’t have the attitude when we landed at normandy that if we didnt take france all at once we might as well not even try... the left has gotten where they are inch by inch and if we have to push it back inch by inch I am willing to fight, I am not going to be a spoiled brat and not participate if I dont get everything I want all at once

Are we really "pushing back", or just stopping the advance temporarily, until the next Democrat administration or congressional majority comes along? What does the history of the last 30 years tell you? Are we really pushing them back by supporting the Republican Party, or are we just slowing the advance?

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Perry is not Bush lite,that is inaccurate.Neither Bush EVER spoke ill of the UN.Gingrich has way too many flip flops.

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/08/11/gingrich_was_for_the_united_nations_before_he_was_against_it

[edzo4]

Are we really "pushing back", or just stopping the advance temporarily

well it will depend on who the nominee is whether we are pushing back or stalling, but either is better than surrender

[tacticalogic]

well it will depend on who the nominee is whether we are pushing back or stalling, but either is better than surrender

Which nominee do you think is going to "push back"? What's their plan to do it?

[Windflier]

Dittos on your picks.

[Rashputin]

Rick Santorum in 2020, not 2012. In 2012 we need someone who knows how to knife fight and beat the bastards at their own game. Santorum isn't capable of doing that, may never be capable of it, and will be far better off if he never has to worry about it. By 2020 either things will have changed enough that dirty pool won't be the order of the day or we'll already be down the tubes and the President will be nothing but a figurehead anyway with the Fascist Democrat party running everything through regulators and unconstitutional agencies.

The Democrat party has always wanted rule by consensus of the nobility, not a single King they might have to wrestle with. The only reason they want a democrat President is to get from where we are to where they want to be. When they think they've arrived at their destination, having any chump who can read a teleprompter and spew the right lies is fine with them. That's why they let Barry have the Presidency, they thought they had finally arrived and would be able to once and for all establish single party rule with a democrat fascist nobility picking who would have which offices and for how long.

Euthanasia and limiting Capitalism to the portions of the economy that please the nobility has been what they've wanted ever since they figured out they couldn't control the Wobblies as effectively as they had controlled the Klan. Once they knew they wouldn't have the same control of the pure socialist crowd, it became important to the democrat thugs to limit Socialism the same way they wanted to limit Capitalism. That's why they were madly in love with the system Hitler put in place which was a mix of tightly regulated Capitalism and carefully targeted Socialism.

JMHO

[rbmillerjr]

yep...me too...

From Palin to Cain....to the last conservative standing...

Gingrich...with a serious chance to win.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Perry,Bachmann,Santorum

Perry/Bachmann

Perry/Bolton

Perry/Palin

[edzo4]

depends on which issue, there are things I like and dislike about all the canidates, I do not get to pick who the nominee is I get a chance to pick who i think the nominee should be then I just get to choose between obama or that nominee and that is a simple choice for me, not voting for the person who runs against obama is the same as voting for obama

[david1313]

Newt

[blkmontecarlo]

I’m still undecided but here are my choices:

1. Michele Bachmann, I think she would do ok against Barry in the debates and be a good President.

2. Rick Santorum, ditto.

3. Rick Perry, I fear his debating skills against Barry, but a good President.

4. Newt Gingrich would be very entertaining in a debate against Barry but I’m not sure he’s right for President.