Pissant Agrees to Return To FR, Head Sarah Palin Freeper Fundraiser

grey_whiskers ^ | 04-01-2011 | grey_whiskers

[SoDak]

That woman was a real piece of work.

[SoDak]

Yes he did. Hate seeing he’s gone.

[buccaneer81]

You must miss him a lot.

[presently no screen name]

I was on the thread that got him done in and it took me a couple reads to understand what his angle was on that last post.(I am a little dense sometimes)

Me, also. I didn't get it and thought he was zotted perhaps because he was told not to post on Palin threads for the obvious reasons. I had to look up who TB was. He/she obsession was in the 'over-the-top dangerous' category, IMO.

I had the impression that “he” was a female poster. Just some things said during our arguments. I could be wrong.

Years ago, I asked about the name, thinking she was an aunt - I got the impression he was a she, also. Much later on, I saw p*ss referred to his wife. So who knows, who cares.

[rlmorel]

LOL...we can’t forget about Willie Green or Chet99 either! Their posts just became part of the landscape after a while...:)

[factmart]

PISSANT NEEDS TO GO ON THE LEFTS WEBSITES; does too much harm here.

[dixiechick2000]

I understand your frustration. However, how would you be able to run a forum with all of the participants agreeing with each other? I would suggest that you look at the owners of this forum, and their dilemma with your proposition.

“Who has?”

There have been a few who have announced their intention to have an exploratory committee...whatever that is.

Gingrich has announced that he’s going to bypass the exploratory committee process. Pawlenty and, I believe, Bachmann have established exploratory committees.

I’m sure I’ve left someone out...but I don’t care. It’s way too early!

[dixiechick2000]

“Travis McGee aka author Mathew Bracken is still here.”

How do you know him?

You should have been around for the bannings back then.

Then, you could speak to them.

[dixiechick2000]

I suspect he knows all of that. lol

[SunkenCiv]

LOL!

[presently no screen name]

How can you understand my frustration when I never said I was frustrated?

Why should I look to the owner of this site? How weird is that. He clearly states this is a conservative site - but, that doesn’t stop liberals from signing up for their own agenda. And then say we all don’t have to agree - laughable indeed. Just like rino’s with their ‘act’, also. A conservative knows their own.

[presently no screen name]

she just isn’t as conservative as a lot of people believe she is!

Who do you think is more conservative than Sarah?

[JSDude1]

Bachmann, DeMint, Cain, (Pence-if he had decided to run).

[presently no screen name]

DeMint, Cain, Pence- more conservative than Sarah? So it's really just a 'anybody but Sarah'. Duly noted.

[JSDude1]

No, you nut, it’s really I just want a real conservative ans Sarah Palin isn’t it.

She’s pro homosexual, somewhat for foreign policy intervention, (pro-corporate taxes-as her stance of govern shows). Look I don’t hate Palin-but I hardly find her the most (or preferable) conservative of the bunch.

[presently no screen name]

No, you nut,

Liberal tactic - name calling. And the rest of your message confirms it. Duly noted. Get lost.

[Revolting cat!]

Welcome back, Pissy!

[Revolting cat!]

Great!

[dixiechick2000]

You didn’t have to use the word “frustrated” given your post.

“Me. Dissenting voices are everywhere all day long - at work, on CNN and every alphabet station, newspapers, MSM. I know of no conservative that enjoys the rantings of liberals - once in while to slap them down - is OK. And I’m reminded of dissenting voices when I buy gas, hear/read about unemployment, companies shutting down, doctors cutting back on staff bc of obamacare, etc. Why anyone here wants more dissent is weird. I hardly doubt the conservatives that are here - came here for dissenting voices.”

That is the post of someone who is truly frustrated. And, if further proof is needed...

“Why should I look to the owner of this site? How weird is that. He clearly states this is a conservative site - but, that doesn’t stop liberals from signing up for their own agenda. And then say we all don’t have to agree - laughable indeed. Just like rino’s with their ‘act’, also. A conservative knows their own.”

I know that the owner of this site has his mission statement clearly stated on the homepage. No...that doesn’t stop liberals from signing up, and eventually being zotted. The mods are very good at keeping up with them. But, not all of those with whom you disagree are trolls, or liberals.

Suppose the nomination comes down to Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Do you not think there would be flames tossed everywhere between those two camps? Dang straight there would be flames flying all over the place!

I’ve seen too many elections transpire on FR not to believe that would be true.

I can tell you what I do during election season...I answer my pings. ;o)

[presently no screen name]

You didn’t have to use the word “frustrated” given your post. That is the post of someone who is truly frustrated. And, if further proof is needed...

That's further proof of your mind reading. Don't attempt that with me/my words!!! You are applying YOUR reaction to a situation to me and/or what YOU want my reaction to be. You think I go around being frustrated. LOL. I ENJOY putting the commie libs or rino's in their place in my 'real life' and very effectively I might add. I don't do it because of frustration but because I so ENJOY putting my foot on the enemy and pressing down on it. And I do it when I feel like it because clueless fools are not worthy of my constant attention.

Do I enjoy being with my own kind more? YES! Do you think you might be able to stretch your mind into understanding the difference? After all, isn't that what you asked - who wants people around who only agree with you. (Not a new statement on FR and not surprising, either.) So stay focused and don't try to prove 'your point' with mind reading MY WORDS. Liberal tactic - 'you'll agree with me even if I have to put my words in your mouth'.

But, not all of those with whom you disagree are trolls, or liberals.

LOL! So there you are telling me how I should see things YOUR way. It's very easy to spot the most discreet troll - keep that in mind.

Do you not think there would be flames tossed everywhere between those two camps? Dang straight there would be flames flying all over the place!

Of course - that's the point - as long as there are trolls here and libs with conservative masks - there will always be dissension - that's what they are all about. DUH! Not rocket science you are presenting.

I can tell you what I do during election season...I answer my pings. ;o).

There is no doubt in my mind that's what you do. And in the meantime, you might want to work on your 'who wants a site where everyone agrees'. And back off of mind reading - if you want to at least 'appear' credible - that's friendly conservative advice.