Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum Undermines Sarah Palin, Working Mom
Slate's XX Factor ^ | February 9, 2011 | Noreen Malone

Posted on 02/09/2011 3:28:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Matt Lauer's got company today on the political-mother shaming front: Rick Santorum.

Santorum is one of the possible GOP hopefuls for the '12 presidential nomination, along with Sarah Palin, of course. She decided at the last minute not to attend the conservative conference CPAC (she hasn't actually showed up the last few years, in fact—it's become a bit of a tradition for her to cancel). Santorum seized upon the no-show as an opportunity to criticize Palin, who's a hit among the same far-right base he'd be trying to appeal to in a run.

First, in an interview with conservative S.E. Cupp, he hinted at her celebrity profiteering: "I have a feeling that she has some demands on her time, and a lot of them have financial benefit attached to them." This is not an unfair criticism—but his next one was. He pretended to offer a more understanding take on why Palin might be unable to come. "I don’t live in Alaska and I’m not the mother to all these kids and I don’t have other responsibilities that she has." (Itals mine.)

Santorum happens to be the father to seven children—one might assume no matter the parenting balance in the Santorum household, he does, in fact, have some responsibilities in addition to attending CPAC. But more interesting here is the criticism he's subtly rescuscitating. In '08, one of the few things many women on both sides of the aisle could agree on re: Palin was that she had steamrolled over the expectation that women could only go into politics in a big way once their kids were raised, and this was a good thing. Republican women and consultants told me this fall over and over again that seeing her up on the stage at the 2008 GOP convention with her young kids was a moment that everything suddenly looked different, more possible for them. It's how the whole Mama Grizzly movement began, this version of conservative feminism that we found vexing and powerful all at once. Maybe Santorum's comments were a one-off from a sui generis conservative, or maybe it's a sign that the good 'ol boys on the right (and perhaps the left, too) are no longer quite as entranced and stymied by the possibility of grizzly power.


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2012; freepressforpalin; palin; santorum; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Leaving some room for the fact that the press is always looking to find division whether there is or isn’t, and they are always looking for a Palin headline just to get someone to read their silly stuff, and will gladly twist anything into a Palin bash...

Its pretty tone-deaf on Santorum’s part.

One thing I like about Palin and the others on my short list is that they never bash each other, but focus their fire on Obama. Its the Romniac-Huck wing of the GOP that sees Palin as more a threat than Obama. If Santorum wants to be seen as a conservative warrior he should take lessons from Palin. If he wants to be Huck’s vice presidential running mate, then he’s fine the way he is.


21 posted on 02/09/2011 4:10:37 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
You maybe correct:

Santorum's Comment... 1:28 play time


22 posted on 02/09/2011 4:11:24 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I used to think that Santorum had strong conservative and prolife beliefs. Apparently, he does not and is willing to change his positions for votes.
No thanks Rick! Go find something else to do for a living.


23 posted on 02/09/2011 4:17:46 PM PST by RedMDer (Stimulus... hasn't stimulated ANYTHING but The TEA PARTY!!! - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Fair assessment after seeing the video. In print in this context, it looks bad for Santorum, but vid not so much. Still, comparing Sarah to Rick, points go to Sarah for being able to balance all that she does. If she wanted to be at CPAC she would be. Santorum is a strong supporter of conservative values. We need all the help we can get.


24 posted on 02/09/2011 4:34:07 PM PST by daisy mae for the usa (because)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey Rick, what’s that sound? Oh yeah, sounds like your political career being flushed down the crapper. The crap these yahoos throw at Sarah always boomerangs on them.


25 posted on 02/09/2011 4:50:50 PM PST by eaglesiniowa ((Hope is not a course of action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Santorum is a tool. Nothing else needs to be said.


26 posted on 02/09/2011 5:35:29 PM PST by gruffwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh, boo hoo. Santorum was asked a question and he answered it honestly and accurately. You’d have to be pretty obsessed with political correctness find Santorum’s answer “sexist”.


27 posted on 02/09/2011 5:46:49 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Santorum is my former senator, and now he’s a ‘has-been.’


28 posted on 02/09/2011 5:59:25 PM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

I hve no idea why he’s considering a run for the nomination....lol.


29 posted on 02/09/2011 6:02:31 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is a contrived hit piece. I have not figured out whether it is against men in general or just Santorum. Regardless, it is meaningless media puff -a story about a story that was an interview -an interview analysis with a presumed and assumed conclusion...


30 posted on 02/09/2011 6:15:40 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

You guys are so funny. You let the media set up this story and you fall for it. Sarah is on Hannity right now calling all you guys idiots for believing the story because Santorum didn’t say what this story says.


31 posted on 02/09/2011 6:21:45 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Is it really that surprising coming from this crowd?


32 posted on 02/09/2011 6:38:51 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Just saw him on Greta. He had no clue as to why this story exploded, nor did the Politico Author ever call and ask him to confirm/clarify or comment.
It’s all balderdash.

This is what the left wants us to do and apparently we are all too willing to leap into the fire before we know who/ or what started it.

Get a grip Guys.
Don’t buy into the program, please.


33 posted on 02/09/2011 7:26:41 PM PST by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I didn’t know Santorum was a major jerk. And to think that I once believed that he was a great guy.


34 posted on 02/09/2011 8:16:48 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

My husband watched his appearance on Greta and told me Santorum only made it worse. I hadn’t paid this idiocy much mind, but my husband said “I’ve never liked that guy, but now I think he’s a jerk.” ...lol.


35 posted on 02/09/2011 8:24:05 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I agree. The guy is pathetic.


36 posted on 02/09/2011 8:32:06 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: deport; CharlesWayneCT
To 22 - You may be correct

CWCT is correct. Santorum was empathizing with Palin, not attempting to demean her. Yet another example of overeager Palin supporters doing exactly what they (rightfully) accuse others in doing to Palin, i.e., distorting, misrepresenting, or outright lying about her/her statements.

Santorum's a twit, but not because of this episode.

37 posted on 02/09/2011 8:38:47 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

In the Kitchen???

me thinks he keeps her under the blankets...

I live in Pennsylvania, I like Rick as my Senator, I voted for him, then he puts all his kids in a school out of his district and the rest is history...

bad boy Rick...but he sure is not Presidential material in my book...

at my house we will be supporting SARAH PALIN now and in the future...


38 posted on 02/09/2011 9:05:39 PM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As a former Santorum supporter with the posting history to prove it, I am convinced that he has become a beltway boy.

Nice knowing you, Rick.
39 posted on 02/09/2011 9:13:25 PM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Agreed. It was a drive-by media attack by politico that distorted the facts in an effort to pit Santorum against Palin.


40 posted on 02/10/2011 12:59:33 AM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson