Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Donnell's win: Has it made Palin the 2012 nominee?
The Week ^ | September 17, 2010

Posted on 09/18/2010 12:42:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
These people actually get paid to write?

That was just plain stupid!

21 posted on 09/18/2010 5:35:32 AM PDT by MarkLevinFan (Thank me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Anyone else noticing the recent uptick in the jounolistas terrorist imagery in regards to the Tea Party? ‘Insurgents’..’dry run’..etc. etc. etc. This has to be part of their orders from the Obama thugs.

So transparent. So pathetic.


22 posted on 09/18/2010 6:37:50 AM PDT by penelopesire ('You are either with us or you are with the marxists')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This post sucks! What good are these post with out pictures of Sarah?


Am I the only one who notices that Sarah seems to get better and better looking?

Where are the pics?
23 posted on 09/18/2010 6:44:41 AM PDT by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigerized
These people need to get out to “flyover country” more. They might find the heart and soul of America.

Amen. It's a beautiful place!

24 posted on 09/18/2010 6:53:48 AM PDT by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. (PursuingLiberty.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hate to introduce a dose of reality to the 24/7 Palin love-fest that Free Republic has become, but Sarah Palin is a sure loser in 2012.

First, beyond this hothouse of Palin-bots, she has far too many negatives, both real (such as her lack of intellectual depth and experience, and her pandering to conservatives), and illusory (the mainstream media is 100% against her, whether their vitriol is fair or unfair does not matter--they are a powerful influence).

In the long run she will either be seen as a major, non-running party power broker for candidates who are electable--maybe someone like Sen. Jim DeMint or a total newcomer who appears on the scene--or an influential force in conservative politics like Phyllis Schafly. In fact, Palin would do well if she could become half as thoughtful or effective as Phyllis Schafly.

Nominating Palin in 2012 would be a sure-fire recipe for assuring a second term for Obama, notwithstanding his deeply troubled presidency. Obama is a wreck of a president, but from 2010 to 2012 he will flip back to "campaign mode," where he is brilliant. With the help of a syncopantic media, some luck, and running against a polarizing, not-up-to-it candidate like Palin, he can pull off a second term as well.

25 posted on 09/18/2010 6:54:01 AM PDT by NetLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Well said!!!


26 posted on 09/18/2010 6:59:03 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin or Bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dagoofyfoot
Will this do?


27 posted on 09/18/2010 7:49:49 AM PDT by frankenMonkey (I can see November from my window...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NetLiberty

I disagree. Obama was able to win favor with so many because he was a blank slate where people could project their aspirations onto him. This is no longer 2008.

If things continue as they are, and they probably will, a yellow dog with mange will be able to defeat Obama in 2012.

As to Sarah’s ‘weaknesses’, the mainstream media has less influence now than ever before. Their mauling of her while she maintains poise and grace makes her look taller, and them look smaller. They made the same accusations against Reagan: too extreme, an intellectual lightweight, a fool, etc.

If she’s so intellectually challenged, and at a disadvantage from the media smackdown, then why is she so effective and successful? Look at the endorsement wins, look at the fundraising she accomplished for otherwise dark horse candidates, and consider the umpteen predictions about her political demise.

We were told she was a write-off after the election, and then after she resigned, and then when she became a commentator, and then when she endorsed candidates “that can’t win.” What happened? She is more influential now, than ever.

No less than the president himself was forced to tap dance and repeatedly respond to her comment on facebook. In two words, she described everybody’s unspoken fear of obamacare “death panels”. ...and then she backed it up with evidence on the wacky extreme positions of Rahm Emmanuel’s lunatic brother.

Since she was cut loose by McCain’s loss, she’s played the media and the opposition like a fiddle.

We’ll see though...or are you going to refuse to support her when she wins the nomination?


28 posted on 09/18/2010 8:19:59 AM PDT by TexasGunRunner (Spay or neuter your pet coons, especially the bearded marxist variety!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t think anybody’s inevitable. That’s why we run the campaigns in the first place. I think Governor Palin is a credible presidential candidate for 2012 and beyond, at least as much so as anybody else who’s been mentioned, and I think if she runs in 2012, she’s got a pretty good shot at winning the nomination, and then beating the Democrat. That’s all I ask. I don’t think she’s the Barry Goldwater of 2012, because that would mean Barack Obama was the Jack Kennedy of 2012, with all that that means, which is somewhat absurd (I think the security’s too good, and in any case Barack and Michelle are no Jack and Jackie), and that Joe Biden is the Lyndon Johnson of 2012, which is completely absurd.


29 posted on 09/18/2010 8:34:37 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: Real And Spectacular...Richard Frank DeCamp, 11/13/34-9/15/10, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetLiberty
"Hate to introduce a dose of reality to the 24/7 Palin love-fest that Free Republic has become,"
"First, beyond this hothouse of Palin-bots,"

There is a little more going on than just freerepublic, as a conservative site, we merely reflect conservative preferences.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

30 posted on 09/18/2010 1:08:28 PM PDT by ansel12 ([fear of Islam.] Once you are paralyzed by fear of Mohammedanism...you have lost the battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“Watch what lessons the GOP establishment and Tea Party base draw from O’Donnell’s loss.”
*********************************************************
Let me see if I have this right: O’Donell upset the incumbent who was a Republican, O’Donell is a Republican but
according to some, she is unelectable. This might suggest that Castle was elected as a known Democrat.


31 posted on 09/18/2010 2:54:18 PM PDT by greyfox (If I were a Democrat I'd be pushing for the fairness doctrine too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

I would like to see Palin as President, Religious notions aside I see her as a no nonsense gal unfased by the establishment. The establisment has to go there is no other way for America to survive. There has to be a new breed of politician, Democrat or Republican who have the interests of the country at heart and not the power that goes with elected office. Weare where we are solely because of politics and the power bestowed by elected office. The deals and counter deals made by politicians will remain long after they have played their little role but the country must suffer the consequences of their back scratching deals, legislation and regulations. We, the public, pay the price of political sytem tweeking and supposed fine tuning. They, the politicians have tweeked us into bankruptcy through taxation and a host of political whims, guesses and down right idiotic mistakes, and we pay and pay and pay. The system needs a complete overhaul.
pay


32 posted on 09/18/2010 3:05:18 PM PDT by greyfox (If I were a Democrat I'd be pushing for the fairness doctrine too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
O'Donnell's win: Has it made Palin the 2012 nominee?

Only if O'Donnell, Miller, Angel and the other Tea Party candidaes win in the general. If they lose the Tea Party will be abandoned as another flash in the pan and Sarah Palin along with it. It is just that simple, for the Tea Party it is time to show their cards. Palin is all in, but we don't yet know what cards the other side is holding.
33 posted on 09/18/2010 6:08:46 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson