The media depends upon their victim slinking away, tail between their legs. But I don’t think such Palin is capable of such a reaction.
When she debates... and she will... she will have her Reagan moment.
LLS
As true as it is she shouldn’t give the b@stards any credit or even acknowledgment.
Simple as that.
Of course Sarah has something that Dan Quayle didn't have, and that's the alternative media. She can get her voice out to the public, unfiltered. But the alternative media isn't as large, so she has to work harder at the job. She's willing to do that, and from the polls, it seems she has overcome a good bit of the negativity from the campaign.
Palin's policy points are never addressed.
This is one her staffers need to put in the permanent rotation. Most impressive spontaneity I’ve heard from her.
Asked whether her family was just going “with the flow,” she quipped: “Only dead fish go with the flow.”
The best line was about how Obama doesnt have any balls..I LOVED IT..she can smack him like no one else can
State
Controlled
Activist
Media
defined President Bush and spread the activist DNC talking point lies without being challenged. The White House did nothing to defend themselves thinking it was the "honorable" thing to do.
Sarah should take every opportunity to define the press as DNC activists until they decide to become journalists.
Hillary had MUCH higher unfavorable before the 2008 election, but today has something like 60%+ support.
If Palin runs and performs well in the debates, she will EARN back the respect of the people, which is how it should be. No one deserves to be handed the nomination.
I support Palin all the way.She was sold a bill of goods by eric erickson in backing karen handel in Georgia.I would hope she would see the error and look more closely at the candidates in the future.
JournOlism at it’s finest.
Of course Wallace did not cite the Greg Sargent blog (the Plum) in July that when he commented on Palin’s Gallup overall numbers of 44/47 two weeks ago, he wrote that he had talked to Gallup and they had confirmed her numbers with Independent voters were 44/44 at this time and that her numbers with the GOP 76/20.
And don’t forget the July PPP poll in a h/h matchup with Obama among indies that she was beating him 47% to 42%.
Yawn. When the debates happen, and the rallies etc, her numbers will go way up and all the bitter Palin-haters here on FR will be miserable. Maybe they will finally move out of their parents’ basements and get lives....oops I guess I’m a Palin “worshipper” now.
Palin 2012
Greg Sargent two wweks ago when discussing Palin’s F/UF with Gallup (44/47)also wrote that “Gallup had sent his way” more numbers, that Palin’s F/UF were evenly split at 44/44. He then tried to make the argument that Palin had only a net favorability among the GOP (76/20) but he failed to realize at the time by declaring her to have a 44/44 F/UF with indie voters was the greatest present he could have given Palin.
Of course Wallace did not cite Gallup’s poll did he because if he did that would have destroyed his entire narrative
?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/07/only_republicans_like_sarah_pa.html
towards bottom of blog post