Posted on 07/20/2009 8:55:50 PM PDT by EddiesDad
Almost no one in politics or the media will admit it in public, but the GOP lost the Presidency in 2008 by alienating the moral conservative base that the elites loathe. Many stayed home or voted third party, rejecting a nominee who was in fundamental aspects a liberal Democrat.
That is why Barry Sotero — a radical socialist with Islamic roots posing as a Christian, groomed for years by Marxist revolutionaries, who hides essential documents of his birth, education and career, who campaigned with illegal funding from overseas interests, who as far as 300 million Americans can honestly tell, was born in a foreign country and (under the plain language of the Supreme Law of the United States, the Constitution) cannot legally be our President, who lacks even the executive experience of a night manager at a self-serve gas station — nevertheless sleeps in the White House. That’s why. Do the homework. Look at the demographics.
Continue reading at http://greggjackson.com/blog/
(Excerpt) Read more at greggjackson.com ...
Reposted for the DUer troll:
George Deukmejian, the last Conservative GOP Governor on Tricky Dick Riordan: “He’s a person I have no respect for, and there’s no way I could vote for him to be head of our Republican ticket. To me, it wouldn’t make any difference if he was governor or Gray Davis was governor.”
Gonna slander George Deukmejian for nailing your pudding-brained leftist idol, troll ? We support Conservatives on FR, you support liberals and slander Conservatives.
Get lost.
I have no problem discerning the point fieldmarshaldj is making. And it is quite clear that he is not expressing any admiration for these people.
It is clear that he does’nt mind the creep mayor from SF to win the election over Whitman.
What kind of deranged person would think there is no difference in Newscom and Whitman when it comes to winning elections.
"Why vote for Whitman when you have Jerry Brown or the creep Mayor from San Francisco ? At least they’re HONEST about being liberal Democrats. Why vote for Fiorina when you can have Boxer, who is honest about her real party affiliation ?"
It is you, you buffoonish troll, that champions the cause of left-wingers, bashes Free Republic and its distinguished posters with your filth, trying to hijack MY party, the Republican party, and force your trash candidates right down our throats. I'll state again, since you are so bereft of any logic, just like your pudding-brained, Democrat endorsing idol, Tricky Dick Riordan, that if you're going to elect a liberal who supports the Marxist/rodent agenda, like you do, let's spare the bullcrap and vote for the real deal. Stop lying to us and telling us LIBERAL RINOs support Conservatism when they supporting destroying Conservatism.
I'm kind of jealous. ;-)
Tell me which post did i wish for Riordan to win the primary. All i said is Davis sabotaged Riordan because he wanted to face Simon who is guaranteed to lose the election because he was a lousy candidate.
Why post riduculous baseless allegations with out any proof.
Here you are in your own words, expressing that you wish Newsom, Jerry Brown , Boxer to win the elections if Whitman, Fiorina are the nominees.
You are supporting Democrat filths to win elections because you dont support the Republican candidates.
What kind of deranged, idiotic conservative are you if you love these creeps to get elected.
Stop pretending to be a Republican, you are not and just looking ridiculous if you say you want supporting conservatism, you are fraud in this site.
Hey, if you want to play with the projecting troll, be my guest. Just remember to put on some gloves, it smells like turds.
Well, good morning Resty..
You seem you same level of sweetness self...
3 quarts short...
You’ll note well the trick of the liberal cretins attempting to infiltrate the GOP and maximize damage is to deliberately associate ALL Republican candidates with Conservatives, when as we’ve seen that many are not, and that liberals, once ensconced and protected within the GOP, are in a position to inflict far worse damage to the party than a Democrat could from without. This, of course, is your basic trojan horse.
I’ve quoted from the last Conservative Governor of CA, George Deukmejian, who said he regarded the liberal trojan horse Democrat/RINO Riordan as being no different than Davis. As we all learned after Davis’s recall (and predicted by me ahead of time, as my 2003 posts will tell), that the replacement with Ah-nold, a Socialist, led to an explosion and expansion of government, spending, taxes, et al, far beyond the wildest dreams of the regular liberal Democrat Davis, who now can actually wear the label of “fiscal Conservative” because Ah-nold made that possible.
We just witnessed in NY in the past few days that for a Congressional vacancy for the 23rd District (McHugh seat), a group of RINO elite county chairs officially confirmed that they had chosen (without the input of the voters) a left-winger so odious that she was being courted to run by the Democrats (and indeed, if she is elected to Congress, there’s a 50/50 chance she’ll switch parties, since there is nothing she agrees on with respect to the Conservative agenda). I publicly refuted her candidacy and said that if the Dems nominated a State Senator named Aubertine (who sits in a GOP district, and is a borderline DINO, but to the right of the left-wing RINO), that Aubertine would be preferable. Aubertine isn’t going to run, since if he leaves his seat, the seat likely will go GOP, and the NY GOP will re-tie the State Senate. Thankfully, Conservatives will have a choice in the race with another candidate running (Jim Kelly, who is a Conservative), so we won’t have to do something as equally odious as vote for a rodent to stop a RINO who will shortly become a rodent.
But Greg the troll reminds us well that it is of paramount importance to flush liberal turds like him and his idols out of party, before they finish off the job of making the GOP completely irrelevent (or dead, as in such states where liberals completely hijacked the party, such as in Massachusetts - hence the subject of this thread).
Do I need to repeat myself?
"I don’t demand perfect candidates from California (<......look) but I do demand something that actually is appreciably better than a democrat. He’s (Arnold) not, he’s the Mike Bloomberg of California."
Run DiFi as a Republican and she'd be a "winner" wouldn't make her any better than the democrat that ran on the democrat ticket.
Sure Arnold is a bit to right of the average Cali rat but he's far enough to the left that nothing good has come of him being in office. He just gives a "Republican" face to idiotic liberalism.
George Deukmejian seems to know the score, at least as far as that loser Riordan. And you can keep trashing him all you want but Fieldmarshaldj is a lifelong student of politics, more savvy than you to be sure, and a long time and valued member of this forum.
He said back in 2003 that Arnold would be a disaster, I thought Arnie was "better than the democrat" and deserved a chance. He was right, I was wrong.
I'm not sure about Whitman and NJ candidate Chris Christie. Or Carly Fiorina, though I'm more tolerent of less than stellar Republicans running for a legislative seat, RINO executives often bring disaster and because they are "Republican" the GOP gets the blame (and the confidence of the base) and loses the next election or 3.
That DJ is warning against them doesn't fill me with confidence that are actually ok moderates and not liberal trash. I hope for the former. There is a big difference between those 2 that you don't seem to grasp.
And Greg you are extremely wrong about DU and slanderous against Free Republic with your accusations. They call Crist gay too (because he likely is). And they personally savage every Republican and even democrats that aren't insane enough for them (like solid leftist DiFi who is "DLC scum"). When Jesse Helms died every post at DU and KOS was "burn in hell". When Ted Kennedy croaks soon you will see a MUCH more polite response here from most.
You have not produced a single post where I have bashed any conservative in this site.
I've mostly been skipping your posts because I've found your contributions dull, predictable, and orthodox of a young and inexperienced person and/or someone who thinks inside a nicely proscribed formula, but what I have read of you makes this much clear: you promote and embrace registered Republicans who betray limited government conservative principle, and you define "losers" as Republicans who uphold and promote limited government conservatism. The name of the party the politician belongs to is more important to you than the political philosophy of the politician. You view "winning" and "losing" in material terms, akin to sports; fieldmarshaldj and I, along with many others, have learned the hard way that in politics is very different from sports. "Winning" and "losing" in politics are only effective and meaningful when they refer and apply to political philosophy and priniciple.
All you do here is whine like a little girl when I point out that I dont like losers running as conservatives and letting the Dummies get a easy election win.
No, dear, you're the one who "whines like a little girl" by retorting to fieldmarshaldj that he "enjoys liberals like Boxer getting landslide victories." That is a little-girl whine if I ever heard one. You think that using the terms "shut the f up" and "fck off" makes you sound like a man instead of a little girl ... and in that, too, you're mistaken.
That's a gem, fmdj. Right on the money.
Ditto and AMEN. Talk show host John Ziegler was saying the same thing, and I didn't like Ziegler for it -- I'd turn off his show in annoyance. Turns out he was right and I was wrong, and Ziegler has a lot more credibility with me now.
Also, NOW I am applying what I learned from Arnold. In that application, politicans who promote more, bigger government and who are registered as Repubicans, forfeit my vote. Politicians who are registered as Republicans and advocate cutting back government and limiting it, and see this as a never-ending chore like keeping weeds back in the garden, will get my vote. ONLY they will get my vote.
I live in Massachusetts but I have no clue who the power elite behind the Mass Republican party are. Does anyone here know who they are? Is there a conflict within the party in the state?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.