|
Posted on 07/20/2009 8:55:50 PM PDT by EddiesDad
Almost no one in politics or the media will admit it in public, but the GOP lost the Presidency in 2008 by alienating the moral conservative base that the elites loathe. Many stayed home or voted third party, rejecting a nominee who was in fundamental aspects a liberal Democrat.
That is why Barry Sotero — a radical socialist with Islamic roots posing as a Christian, groomed for years by Marxist revolutionaries, who hides essential documents of his birth, education and career, who campaigned with illegal funding from overseas interests, who as far as 300 million Americans can honestly tell, was born in a foreign country and (under the plain language of the Supreme Law of the United States, the Constitution) cannot legally be our President, who lacks even the executive experience of a night manager at a self-serve gas station — nevertheless sleeps in the White House. That’s why. Do the homework. Look at the demographics.
Continue reading at http://greggjackson.com/blog/
(Excerpt) Read more at greggjackson.com ...
ping
Now that sums it up.
So much for just arguing the merits. We can't be against Romney for his politics--has to be, if he becomes the nominee, the mountains will crumble and the waters will turn to blood.
Which I thought was already the case with the boob in the White House we have now.
BINGO!
|
Romney Derangement Syndrome?!?! LOL!
See 4.
I think the dirty little secret is, Obamao had 7 million more votes then GWB did in 2004, McCain had a higher vote total then Reagan did.
McCain would have been close to Kerry in 2004.
Whatever it is “we” did, IMO it would not have mattered, 2008 was a Dhimmi tidal wave.
Krauthammer is for Romney so now I guess the anti Romney’s will turn on Krauthammer.
God but I am so sick of the boring Romney bashing on this site. It’s beyond the pale.
*yawn*
I agree. I could feel it, and I bet most anyone could, if they stopped and considered what they KNEW as opposed to what they FELT. Sort of like Dole vs. Clinton--I don't think at any time I sensed Dole was going to win.
Yes, soooo boring. We just soooo need to fall in line behind the Socialist RINO False Messiah. We all need to get down our knees and worship the good-haired “ONE.” He’s just so better than us, so awesome, so wonderful. If only I can just touch his garment, why we’ll have world peace and sing Kumbaya all together.
Well, I had hoped that Gov Palin would have drawn more to the McCain/Palin ticket but the African American turnout was massive, the non African American turnout in several key states was underwhelming.
That led to Dhimmis sweeping elections.
As for Mitt R, I “liked” him, I don’t believe he has the charisma to be elected President though, along with Fred Thompson, there is just no..well...connection with either of those two.
I had thought when Fred threw his hat into the ring he would hop to the head of the field, and it just never happened ditto Mitt R.
CAN THIS BE TRUE? Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Tony Perkins?... Pitching for flip-floper?... Please someone tell me this is NOT TRUE!
What a bizarre article! No decent human being can stomach it. Mitt Romney and his wonderful family do not deserve to be harassed in this manner.
Romney needs to start a truth squad of his own to defend himself and his family against this filth and trash.
“the GOP lost the Presidency in 2008 by alienating the moral conservative base that the elites loathe.”
******
The GOP also lost a nice chunk of economic conservatives who the elites tossed over the side in the spirit of “bipartisanship.” Faced with the choice of two socialists, some economic conservatives chose neither. (Note: Before I get flamed, I held my nose and voted for McCain as the lesser of two evils).
There are things I like about Palin, but I really don't understand the feverish Obama-level worship of her. I know that alone makes me a "hater" around here, but I don't hate her. I just don't think she has what it will take to win in 2012. I sure don't think Romney has it, either.
Still keeping an open mind on Romney. Without going along with some liberal policies, he’d never have been elected anything in Mass. All Romney haters and their articles can’t change that fact, and they can’t change the fact the Clinton and Gore were pro-life and pro-second amendment when running for office in Arkansas and Tennessee.
That’s common. Think I’ll just listen to Romney when it matters and decide whether he’d govern as a conservative, or not.
If this is true then the moral conservative base is too stupid for words.
“Free Republic is a pro-life and liberty conservative site and there’s no way we’re going to support [Slick Willard] a liberal RINO for president. If you wish to support a PARTY RINO for political expediency rather than God and country, you’ll be welcome to do it somewhere else.” — Jim Robinson
“And the media, as usual, is panting hard for the most liberal Republican they can find in the primary race. Namely, Governor Slick Willard Romney.
Hey, Romney’s ok. IF you’re one of those liberal/moderate RINO types that loves big government forcing big government “solutions” for health care, etc, down your throat. AND if you can morally ignore his liberal record in Massachusetts that left the state saddled with a bankrupting state run health care system, taxpayer funded abortions, gay marriage, gun control, sanctuary cities, intrusion and government coercion into private matters, etc, etc, etc, AND you’ve convinced yourself that it wasn’t Slick’s fault. The liberals made him do it, etc. They don’t call him Kennedy’s best friend for nothing, y’know.” — Jim Robinson
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
