Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomy Picture of the Day 7-25-03
NASA ^ | 7-25-03 | Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell

Posted on 07/25/2003 5:25:49 AM PDT by petuniasevan

Astronomy Picture of the Day

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2003 July 25
See Explanation.  Clicking on the picture will download
 the highest resolution version available.

Dumbbell Nebula Halo
Credit & Copyright: Robert Gendler

Explanation: In 1764, French astronomer Charles Messier sighted this gorgeous cosmic cloud which he described as an oval nebula without stars. Cataloged as M27, it is now popularly known as the Dumbbell Nebula, not for its substandard academic performance but for the elongated shape, like a bar with weights on each end, which first caught Messier's eye. This deep image of the bright planetary nebula does reveal the Dumbell's central star though, and an array of foreground and background stars toward the sly constellation Vulpecula. The picture is a composite that includes 8 hours of exposure through a filter designed to record only the light of hydrogen atoms, tracing the intricate details of the nebula's faint outer halo which spans light-years. Thought to be an example of the fate awaiting our own Sun 5 billion years hence, the Dumbbell Nebula is about 1,200 light-years away.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: dumbbell; nebula
If you haven't stopped by Rob Gendler's astropics website before, you're in for a treat. He's good!


Below are 2 different images of M27 from NOAO.

The Dumbbell Nebula in Hydrogen and Oxygen

M27: The Dumbbell Nebula

Dumbbell Nebula M27 in constellation Vulpecula

[m27.jpg]

Right Ascension 19 : 59.6 (h:m)
Declination +22 : 43 (deg:m)
Distance 1.25 (kly)
Visual Brightness 7.4 (mag)
Apparent Dimension 8.0x5.7 (arc min)

Realize that these are long-exposure images. At the eyepiece of, say, an 8-inch 'scope, you will probably see something like this (but probably fainter):


1 posted on 07/25/2003 5:25:49 AM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MozartLover; Joan912; NovemberCharlie; snowfox; Dawgsquat; viligantcitizen; theDentist; ...

2 posted on 07/25/2003 5:26:44 AM PDT by petuniasevan (Contentsoftaglinemaysettlesomewhatduringtransmission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Beautiful. I've seen it, but not like that.
3 posted on 07/25/2003 5:46:33 AM PDT by foolish-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
it is now popularly known as the Dumbbell Nebula, not for its substandard academic performance but for the elongated shape

Science humor - I love it!
4 posted on 07/25/2003 5:52:57 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (where is Count Petofi when we need him most?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Marvellous!
5 posted on 07/25/2003 6:22:56 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
That first picture looks like earth surounded by a red cloud.
6 posted on 07/25/2003 11:32:34 AM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Nice. Thanks for the ping.
7 posted on 07/25/2003 12:55:17 PM PDT by sistergoldenhair (Don't be a sheep. People hate sheep. They eat sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Great pictures!

Planetary nebulae frequently contain great arcs of matter that are denser than the surrounding nebula. This is an important clue about how the nebulae are formed. The standard explanation of planetary nebula formation suggests that these stars are at the end of life, and shed their outer layers in the process of becoming white dwarf stars.

If this were the case, one would expect the nebulae to be more uniform and spherical as the outer gas layers are blown out into space.

It is well known that most star systems have more than one star. When stars (or planets) pass too closely (within the Roche limit) to each other, the more massive body can pull matter from the surface of the less massive body. In the case of a main sequence star there is great internal pressure that helps to eject the surface material when the stellar companion passes close by. Some of the ejected matter may accrete onto the companion, and the remainder is blown outward by the solar wind, forming the dense arcs that we see.

This is illustrated in the picture below. Note the central star, and it's companion (northwest of the central star). There appears to be a faint trail of material (green) dragging behind the companion that leads toward the northeast. This appears as if the companion is in an elliptical orbit and moving counter clockwise around the central star as viewed in this image of the New Born Nebula.

Planetary nebulae may be more of an indicator of close orbits than stellar age.

8 posted on 07/26/2003 9:29:40 AM PDT by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson