Skip to comments.
ZOT! Free Republic Sucks?
Posted on 05/02/2003 6:37:21 AM PDT by fisherspats
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-486 next  last
To: fisherspats
    Is your screen name an anagram of your former banned names? If you, you might be: 
 
spits_afresh 
faster_ships 
parish_fests 
fathers_piss 
reships_fast 
 
Oops, now I might get banned. 
 
Just being,
To: fisherspats
    If you back up your statements with reason and facts, JimRob will let you stay. You can even argue that W. is an alien. Just back it up with reason and facts. But if all you can do is gripe about how evil everyone is and unfair everything is, U R outta here.
442
posted on 
07/05/2003 5:41:01 PM PDT
by 
JoeSchem
(Okay, now it works:  Knight's Quest, at http://www.geocities.com/engineerzero)
 
To: Maelstrom
    What were states allowed to do prior to Lincoln's War?What states were allowed to do would take too long to answer. But here is what one man was allowed to do: 
"Continually puling about liberty, equality, and the degrading curse of slavery, he [Thomas Jefferson] brought his own children to the hammer . . . "
Abraham Lincoln, my party's first president, said the above, in 1844, concerning the first president from the other major party. Of course, Lincoln could have been exaggerating. It may only have been Jefferson's in laws and cousins by common law marriage whom he brought to the hammer. 
If being a conservative means siding with slave state hotheads against the fellows in Fort Sumter, I'm going back to being a liberal.
 
To: Admin Moderator
    Do me -- do me!! thanks, 
 
PK
To: Maelstrom
To: Zavien Doombringer
    Here's the definition of 
Zot!
446
posted on 
07/05/2003 5:54:35 PM PDT
by 
gitmo
(Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.)
 
To: Blueflag
    So, you got 132 emails from others banned. Free Republic is generally very anonymous. How did they get your email AFTER your screen names were banned? 
 Your post lacks veracity. 
  
Probably bragging on DU about getting banned on FR.
 
 
 
 
447
posted on 
07/05/2003 5:58:56 PM PDT
by 
gitmo
(Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.)
 
To: fisherspats
    By the way, what are you so angry about?
448
posted on 
07/05/2003 5:59:49 PM PDT
by 
gitmo
(Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.)
 
To: Natural Law
    He has a new name by now .
 I'm curious why you wont take the intiative and build something better instead of arresting the human potential God gave you ?
To: Admin Moderator
    To quote my boys, "Me next!"
450
posted on 
07/05/2003 6:22:32 PM PDT
by 
Jonx6
 
To: dorben
    Its not that important to me
To: fisherspats
    What did Bush know and when did he know it?
452
posted on 
07/05/2003 8:55:06 PM PDT
by 
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
 
To: WhiskeyPapa
    Yes
453
posted on 
07/05/2003 9:39:32 PM PDT
by 
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
 
Comment #454 Removed by Moderator
To: Steve Eisenberg
    The last response will probably be yanked. 
 
To put it more clearly. 
 
You have absolutely no idea what I was talking about. You have absolutely no idea how much I abhor the implications of Walt's posts concerning the War of Northern Agression. You have absolutely no idea of the consequences of those implications or you could *not* have suggested that I ally with a terrorist. 
 
You sir...are the lowest form of scum.
455
posted on 
07/05/2003 9:42:54 PM PDT
by 
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
 
To: wideawake
    503c
To: fisherspats
    I once knew a guy who always had hog manure on his boots, when he came to my house, I put up with it a couple of times, I got tired of the house smelling like a hog farm, I started asking him to leave, finally I asked him not to come back. 
 Maybe you should clean the pig manure off your shoes.
457
posted on 
07/05/2003 10:00:12 PM PDT
by 
c-b 1
 
To: Maelstrom; Steve Eisenberg
    You have absolutely no idea what I was talking about. You have absolutely no idea how much I abhor the implications of Walt's posts concerning the War of Northern Agression.The implication of my posts is that the neo-confederates today offer an interpretation based on fantasy, not history.
The founding fathers had absolutely no doubt that they were establishing a permanent federal Union. Neo-confederates want to suggest that unilateral state secession was legal when it as nothing but revolution --revolution against a governnment that southerners had a large part in creating and one which they had controlled for decades prior to the Civil War.
Neo-confederates love getting a tear in their beer over the sacrifice of rebel soldiers when the record shows that the rebel armies melted away from desertion. Rebel armies depended much on conscription. Rebel armies didn't have nearly the success as commonly thought. The insurgent armies had not ONE major success outside Virginia THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE WAR, excepting Chickamauga. Grant's army (later commanded by Sherman) advanced from Forts Henry and Donelson, through Nashville, took Vicksburg, moved across Tennnessee, into Georgia and through the Carolinas and except for Chickamauga met success everywhere.
Even the great hero Lee had as little success outside Virginia, as deposed Union Generals Pope, Hooker and Burnside had within it. Lee's reputation hangs on one battle, Chancellorsville. His army had more casualties every day of the Seven Days' battle than McClellan's did. He narrowly avoided defeat at Antietam, in a campaign that was ill-considered. He wrecked his own army for offensive operations at Gettysburg in another ill-considered raid. He's way over-rated.
The war was caused by slavery -- by rebels willing to overthrow the government rather than see their peculiar institution be bridled in any way.
These are the facts of the matter, and you don't much like them. I can't help that.
I didn't post anything to you to start this.
I'd suggest that you just let it go.
Walt
 
458
posted on 
07/06/2003 3:37:52 AM PDT
by 
WhiskeyPapa
(Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
 
To: Steve Eisenberg
    Great post. Thanks.
The neo-confederate position can only be accepted if one doesn't know the history, and they pretty much bitterly resent the true record coming out.
Walt
 
459
posted on 
07/06/2003 3:56:10 AM PDT
by 
WhiskeyPapa
(Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
 
To: lulabelle
    You must be running out of screen names. Fisherspats is kinda dorky!
 
 Here are some anagrams of Fisherspats that are marginally better:
 
 TRAPS FISHES
 PHASER FISTS
 STARFISH ESP
 I PRESS SHAFT
 SHE SPITS FAR
 IS PAST FRESH
 PERT FISH ASS
460
posted on 
07/06/2003 4:03:26 AM PDT
by 
aruanan
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-486 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson