Replies

Good gosh...first of all let this thread die...it has no place here on FreeRep. Second, if you are going to debate, at least have the common courtesy of reading some of Darwins work, and the subsequent work of at least 10 others before you summarily dismiss the man.

While you are at it, why don't you look up the definition of science, and maybe the scientific method or better yet do more research here on freerep to educate yourself.

I see this is your first encounter with Gore3000.

You see, he doesn't need to actually *learn* any of the fields he tries to rebut -- he feels no need to, not even when he's making up stuff that he falsely claims scientists have written.

For just one example, we're *still* trying to get him to provide any Darwin quote which supports Gore3000's allegations of the existence of a "Darwin's racist claim that the brachyocephalic index showed what races were superior and which were inferior."

After much insistence that he support or retract this slur, the best (*cough*) he could come up with was to claim "That Darwin said it can be easily found by doing a search on the Origins." Well no, actually, it can't. Nor can Gore3000 manage to provide the alleged passage, despite the fact that he said it could be "easily found".

That's just one of many the Gore3000 FABNAQ's (Frequently Asked But Never Answered Questions) which Freeper Dan Day has compiled.

In short, he's making it up as he goes along and hoping nobody calls him on it.

scientific method n. The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.

Now show me where Darwin or any evolutionist has complete the method to prove evolution? I have yet to read of the observation of one species changing into another. What conclusion that validates has the world missed?

Good gosh...first of all let this thread die...it has no place here on FreeRep.

Is your name Jim Robinson? Who died and put you in charge here? If you do not like the thread, go somewhere else, there are thousands of threads to choose from here.

You are just another evolutionist tyrant which when faced with the truth about how silly your atheist/materialist theory is wants to silence opponents. Well, this is still a free country. So those who oppose evolution will keep on speaking against it and showing how lame and foolish it is.

Oh and BTW - don't tell me that you are for evolution because it is 'science' instead of because it is the basis for materialistic atheism in our day. Don't tell me that because if you were in it because of the science you would welcome discussion and you also would be able to defend your theory instead of trying to silence those who disagree with it.