[<1/1,000,000th%]

No. I'm not actually angry at all. Although I'm still confused at why gore3000 is so anti-science. I've previously accused him of having a financial interest in fleecing gullible Christians, like medved did, but I didn't get an answer.

Like your icon.

[PatrickHenry]

With all this anti-evolution chatter, I thought I'd present what seems to be an example of natural selection in action today. A whole bunch of newly-discovered frog species seem to be well-adapted to surving the environmental problems that are killing off their cousins.

The majority of these lay eggs that undergo what is known as terrestrial direct development. In this process, the eggs incubate on land before the frogs hatch as miniature adults, skipping the tadpole stage completely. Such growth could help explain why these animals have persisted, the scientists suggest, because many of the factors thought to be responsible for the decline of frog populations are particularly dangerous to water-based young.
Scientists Spy Dozens of New Frog Species in Sri Lanka.

No magic involved. Just mutation, environmental changes, and good old natural selection.

[gore3000]

Although I'm still confused at why gore3000 is so anti-science.

Excuse me. Who says I am anti-science. I am completely for science. Being against the pseudo-science of evolution does not make me anti-science, it makes me pro-science. You have plenty of scientific facts which are known to be true in the article and links above. They show quite well that there is abundant scientific facts contradicting the theory of evolution and in my mind they overwhelmingly disprove the theory. If you disagree with my position, then disprove the facts I have laid out instead of making baseless assertions.