The majority of these lay eggs that undergo what is known as terrestrial direct development. In this process, the eggs incubate on land before the frogs hatch as miniature adults, skipping the tadpole stage completely. Such growth could help explain why these animals have persisted, the scientists suggest, because many of the factors thought to be responsible for the decline of frog populations are particularly dangerous to water-based young.No magic involved. Just mutation, environmental changes, and good old natural selection.
Scientists Spy Dozens of New Frog Species in Sri Lanka.
But THAT DOESN'T MEAN ... blah blah blah! </creation_mode>
So what? They found some supposedly new species of frogs in Sri Lanka by doing an exhaustive search. That's why they did the search is it not? To discover something new. Why this should be considered evolution is only in your eyes.
BTW - unScientific American again shows the total stupidity of its editorial staff. It is a wonder these idiots even got a high school diploma. They state as one of the reasons for considering these frogs as new species:
By comparing the specimens to Sri Lankan samples stored in museums around the world and analyzing differences in appearance, genetics and behavior (including the animals's telltale croaks).
How can you tell the 'croak' of a frog that has croaked?
On the other hand it could be that the scientists are changing the "evidence".
By comparing the specimens to Sri Lankan samples stored in museums around the world and analyzing differences in appearance, genetics and behavior (including the animals's telltale croaks), the scientists identified 120 new species.