Excuse me. Who says I am anti-science. I am completely for science. Being against the pseudo-science of evolution does not make me anti-science, it makes me pro-science. You have plenty of scientific facts which are known to be true in the article and links above. They show quite well that there is abundant scientific facts contradicting the theory of evolution and in my mind they overwhelmingly disprove the theory. If you disagree with my position, then disprove the facts I have laid out instead of making baseless assertions.
I say it because you don't recognize any scientific process. You discount observational evidence and you have no statement of your alternate theory. You hang your hat on "evolution is wrong", and deny any evidence presented to you.
Even your examples aren't "disproofs", although you call them that. What is your scientific background?