Skip to comments.
Elizabeth Smart Thread, 9/9/02 to ???
Posted on 09/09/2002 8:52:09 PM PDT by stlnative
New thread...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: elizabethsmart; richardricci
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 921-922 next last
To: varina davis
You know, sandude and others of like mind, the term "seatcovers" could be a matter of interpretation. This is true but when Angela says that the Jeep has never had seatcovers when in fact there was some sort of covering on them it smacks of deception.
421
posted on
09/13/2002 9:58:12 PM PDT
by
sandude
To: Sherlock
At an afternoon news conference Monday, Trujillo described the driver he saw as a white male with dark hair, wide sideburns, wearing a cream-colored shirt or jacket and driving a white or silver sedan made in the late 1980s or early 1990s. He was not wearing a hat. Trujillo observed the "Grand Am type" car... Wow!!! You are really on a roll! How are you going to top this? IMHO, today you have posted some of the most significant aspects of this case since these threads started. Great work. Not coincidentally, they all point to Ricci.
To: sandude
I still wish they would get the milkman and Fred Trujillo together and make a composite sketch. Maybe even throw in Moul.
To: Devil_Anse
Amazing how much you can get out of an interrogee if you just convince him that you have a superior power, a power of seeing through his lies.Again, Devil_Anse, will you be joining the David Smart search Saturday in the canyons?
To: spore-gasm
Ed is a player, I guess, and one has to sometimes get his hands dirty to be a player.
But, spore-gasm, are you really thinking that Ed could out-con a guy who's spent over half his life in a place filled with every scam artist in the book?
Are you really suggesting that Ed had more street-smarts than "Richard?"
Which one do we know for a fact had done dishonest things? And which one do we just ASSUME had done dishonest things?
To: Devil_Anse
THIS DEMONSTRATION IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREATING IN THE MIND OF THE TESTED SUBJECT, A BELIEF IN THE POWER OF THE POLYGRAPH TO DETECT LYING. Interesting.
To: Jolly Green
To: Sherlock At an afternoon news conference Monday, Trujillo described the driver he saw as a white male with dark hair, wide sideburns, wearing a cream-colored shirt or jacket and driving a white or silver sedan made in the late 1980s or early 1990s. He was not wearing a hat. Trujillo observed the "Grand Am type" car...
Wow!!! You are really on a roll! How are you going to top this? IMHO, today you have posted some of the most significant aspects of this case since these threads started. Great work. Not coincidentally, they all point to Ricci.
Trujillo also said the man he saw DID NOT have a mustache and did not resemble Ricci.
To: Sherlock
Guy who just got out of jail in March and admitted he'd been an accomplice in another murder:
Rettenberger. Per, Scaredkat's posted article on the old thread.
Yes, Rettenberger has bangs like the pig-roast man. Rettenberger is dark-complected like the pig-roast man. And it looked to me like Rettenberger had SIDEBURNS.
Note: Rettenberger is only 23 years old.
To: lakey
banks robbed by more than one person since Bonnie & ClydeThe Three Stooges, and the movie Funny Face with Bill Murrey and Gina Davis.
To: spore-gasm
Any person who knowingly trades a defective vehicle for hours of labor to avoid insurance, taxes, etc., is IMO, a shady businessman. The jeep was a 1991, as I recall - over ten years old. Anyone buying a used car should expect that they are buying a car that it AS IS! No one warranties a used car for more than 90 days and Ricci drove the Jeep for more than ninety days before he finished paying for it. He knew EXACTLY what he was getting and was happy to get it. Your hypothesis and whinning is as devoid of logic and common sense, as are most of your other posts.
To: Jolly Green
Ricci drove the Jeep for more than ninety days before he finished paying for it.Thought it was given to him in lieu of wages.
To: lakey
"Am anxiously awaiting the trial's evidence"
No fair, Lakey. You know there will never be a trial of Ricci for the bank robbery. When Ricci died, his criminal cases died with him.
You are willing to give the presumption of innocence to a dead man. I just hope you're giving that same presumption to all your live suspects.
To: varina davis
You know, again, Varina, you know, I am just really glad, you know, that we members of the Smart and Ricci families, you know, have found this civilized way of discussing our differences.
To: spore-gasm
Any person who knowingly trades a defective vehicle for hours of labor to avoid insurance, taxes, etc., is IMO, a shady businessman. Do you have proof that he avoided any of these things? Do you think he might have given Rick a very good deal on the vehicle because he wanted to do the Christian thing? I don't know these things and I don't think that you have any proof of what you are saying either.
434
posted on
09/13/2002 10:13:26 PM PDT
by
sandude
To: Devil_Anse
You know, again, Varina, you know, I am just really glad, you know, that we members of the Smart and Ricci families, you know, have found this civilized way of discussing our differences.Why you enjoy being obtuse, I don't know, but please report back to us about the search.
To: Devil_Anse
Ricci won't be a defendant, but wouldn't the prosecution have to bring up his part in the robbery?
436
posted on
09/13/2002 10:17:46 PM PDT
by
lakey
To: varina davis
"Thought [jeep] was given to him in lieu of wages."
Don't you get it? Ed let him start driving it right away, trusting Rick to come back and do the work, giving Rick credit, bit by bit, against the stated price. IOW, Ed let Rick buy the thing on credit. Ed extended credit to Rick. He gave him the privilege of driving this wonderful vehicle b/f Rick has paid a penny, and let Rick make periodic "payments" of work hours.
Ed's safeguard was that he held the title. He was the lienholder. HE COULD HAVE REPOSSESSED THE JEEP if Rick hadn't paid off the debt.
To: Devil_Anse
The sketch looks a lot more like Angela Ricci than Rettenberger. I'd like to see a picture of Angela's brother and Remington.
To: Devil_Anse
Of course, every human is God's creature. There has to have been good in the man--good that came from God. But I see absolutely no good in him that came from the man himself. I do believe that there was not much redeeming value in Richard but there was some. I was trying to point out that he did show a level of intelligence in his writing that one would not find in a lot of criminals. He was capable of planning something like this. Good points on the Clinton comparison.
439
posted on
09/13/2002 10:19:09 PM PDT
by
sandude
To: sandude
Very astute, Sandude!
"Do you have proof that [Ed] avoided [insurance, taxes, etc.]?"
I don't think Spore-gasm DOES have that proof, come to think of it.
OH!! I FORGOT!! The presumption of innocence ONLY applies to the now-deceased Richard Ricci! Not to those "snobs" like Ed Smart! How could I forget such a basic rule?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 921-922 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson