Replies

I have seen these necklaces. Go to Claire's boutique or any earring store at the mall if you want to see what it is made of. The plastic is extremely flimsey and delicate. Without a doubt, the same necklace did NOT last for two years, if the child never took it off.

But worse than that, I am highly suspicious of the story about "the necklace" because the Van Dams never said anything without an intention.

That is, they purposefully made a huge deal about the necklace. Why? Because they KNEW she had the necklace on when she died. I still think whoever killed her, KNEW how much the little girl loved the necklace, so they left it on her. It was far, far, too delicate not to have been broken during the struggle for her life, as Dusek pointed out. It was a stretchie piece of plastic, as thin as a rubber band...not even as durable.

Spec, you are dead on here (excuse the pun). I think we ought to take another look at the vds testimony. They didn't say a single thing without a purpose.

The guy who is on CTV with Lisa Bloom played a lot of the vd's testimony on Friday. I was shocked at the lies and carefully placed distractions that were in practically every answer.

I join Rheo: where' the dog bed? What color were the fibers?

Talking about the 'boo game,' Layla's bloody nose, the broken night light, etc. It all means something -- what?

Fox TV did an interview with an investigator about porn and pedophile profiles. DW is nothing like them. This timing is fortuitous. Leet's hope a few jurors don't turn the channel quite fast enough.

I saw the necklace-- in the bag photo--

I don't know how flimsy-(weak) the plastic necklace was, like in comparing new to worn and 2 years old. You could be right, that (they -whom ever ) thought the necklace was more important as a ID'ing type of thing, if that is what you are saying.
Maybe so, that the plastic became more important to Danielle out out sentiment, because she wore it for 2years prior. However, the prior Dec. she was bought (14 K gold or ?K-gold) Mickey M. earings, she didn't take that off either, according to Brenda. I say Brenda encouraged her to wear or not wear whatever.

Also, her teeth were missing --not her two front teeth, but the ones next to central incisors(or the ones on each side of the central- called 'LATERAL INCISORS'), these were 8- year permanent adult teeth, that were just breaking through the sockets. (see passport photo - show central incisors and baby canines) The only noticeable teeth are the front and baby canines. According to Sperber, her left/right incisors (next to central- that don't show in photo) were just breaking through -their crown were showing, according to the empty left and right sockets that he found.

This was also odd to me. According to Sperber, It was odd to him too. The sockets were there but not the left right permanant insicors. I say, it took more than force to dislodge those teeth. They had to be pulled. Again, really odd to me......................