Spec, you are dead on here (excuse the pun). I think we ought to take another look at the vds testimony. They didn't say a single thing without a purpose.
The guy who is on CTV with Lisa Bloom played a lot of the vd's testimony on Friday. I was shocked at the lies and carefully placed distractions that were in practically every answer.
I join Rheo: where' the dog bed? What color were the fibers?
Talking about the 'boo game,' Layla's bloody nose, the broken night light, etc. It all means something -- what?
Fox TV did an interview with an investigator about porn and pedophile profiles. DW is nothing like them. This timing is fortuitous. Leet's hope a few jurors don't turn the channel quite fast enough.
Just a small item that has been bugging me. Both parents took credit for putting the gate in Danielle's doorway. Why the battle on this small detail?
"They didn't say a single thing without purpose".
So start with the 911 tape. Brenda gives way too much information, needlessly, in this tape. As you put it so well "carefully placed" distractions (or clues?)..
They are not that smart; it's just that the LE acted stupid buying one explanation after the other, changing stories and time-lines.
After the verdict, and the GAG order is lifted, there should be some very interesting reading and new information from all sides. (Although CTV and Larry King didn't have much of a problem with the GAG order, did they?) At least the Prosecution didn't have any complaints with them...go figure.
sw