Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor: Westerfield Guilty 'Beyond Possible Doubt'(Many Still Find Van Dam's Culpable)
Court TV ^ | August 7, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 08/06/2002 8:53:49 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Prosecutor: Westerfield guilty 'beyond possible doubt'

Photo
Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek traced the fingerprint, blood and fiber evidence linking defendant David Westerfield to a murdered girl.

SAN DIEGO — Calling the murder of Danielle van Dam an "evil, evil crime" that shattered notions of suburban safety, a prosecutor urged jurors Tuesday to convict her neighbor, David Westerfield, of capital charges.

Before a courtroom filled to capacity for closing arguments, prosecutor Jeff Dusek said the 50-year-old engineer snuck into the second-grader's bedroom last February, snatched her from her canopy bed, killed her and then "dumped this 7-year-old child naked in the dirt like trash for animals to devour."

"He's guilty of these crimes. He's guilty of the ultimate evil. He's guilty to the core," Dusek told jurors at the end of a closing studded with drama despite its three-and-a-half-hour length.

Dusek shouted and jabbed his finger at the defense table when he discussed Westerfield and the child pornography the prosecution says reveals a motive in the killing. But when he mentioned Danielle's death, his voice dropped to a whisper, forcing jurors to lean forward when he said, for example, of the moments before her killing, "This was not an easy time. This was not fast."

 

Westerfield listened to the prosecutor's closing argument Tuesday.

At one point, he slammed his hand again and again on the jury box rail to simulate, he said, Danielle's head striking Westerfield's headboard as he raped her. The image was too much for Brenda van Dam, Danielle's mother. She leapt up from her seat at the back of the courtroom and ran to the door in tears.

Westerfield's lawyer, Steven Feldman, began his closing late Tuesday afternoon. He is to conclude Wednesday morning and then Dusek will have one final opportunity to convince the panel to convict Westerfield of felony murder, kidnapping and child pornography charges.

The six women and six men who have heard evidence in the two-month long trial appeared to pay close attention to Dusek's summation, which focused on the forensic evidence connecting Westerfield to Danielle's disappearance and problems with his alibi for the weekend she vanished.

A spot of her blood on a jacket Westerfield took to the dry cleaners, Dusek said, "in itself tells you he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That alone. But it doesn't stop there."

He also listed fiber, fingerprint and hair evidence linking Westerfield to Danielle and said, "all of it comes back to his lap." Of two blond strands found in the defendant's recreational vehicle and genetically matched to Danielle, he said, "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Proof beyond a possible doubt."

Dusek pointed to an autopsy photo showing Danielle's badly decomposed remains and ticked off the fiber and hair evidence technicians gleaned from her body.

"From Danielle herself, she helps to solve this case," he said.

Westerfield gazed straight ahead, and in the back row of the courtroom, Brenda and Damon van Dam held hands and stared at the floor. A row in front of them and three seats to their right, Westerfield's sister, who was attending the trial for the first time and was in the company of her husband and son, stared at the image.

Dusek also attacked Westerfield's claim that he spent the weekend Danielle vanished on a 560-mile solo road trip in his recreational vehicle.

"He gives us a bogus story that just doesn't wash," said Dusek, referring to his account of driving from his home to the beach then to the desert then to another part of the desert before returning to the beach.

He said Westerfield spent that weekend sexually assaulting Danielle and then after killing her, searching for a place to dump her body.

The prosecutor listed other potential suspects, including the van Dams, their friends, Westerfield's teenage son and even "the bogeyman," but said each was investigated and cleared.

He criticized what he said were defense attempts to implicate Westerfield's son, Neal, in the crime and said testimony about the van Dam's risque sex life, which included swinging, was irrelevant.

"All the sex, the alcohol, who's doing this, who's doing that. That's got nothing to do with her kidnapping," Dusek said.

With Westerfield's mug shot projected on the courtroom wall next to a passport photo of Danielle taken the day she vanished, Dusek said, "I think at times we've lost track of the other person. We've lost track of Danielle, what happened to her, what he did to her."

The prosecutor downplayed bug evidence presented by the defense suggesting Westerfield was under surveillance when Danielle's body was dumped and therefore couldn't have been responsible.

"Everyone's different, has a different estimation, approximation, some might even say guess," said Dusek. He added, "This is not an exact science. This is not DNA."

The prosecutor told jurors repeatedly that he did not have to prove to them why Westerfield killed Danielle, only that he did, but he said he was certain jurors wanted to know, "Why would a regular, normal 50-year-old guy kidnap and kill a 7-year-old child?"

There was no answer, he said, just another question. Pointing to print outs of some 85 images of child pornography found on computers and discs in Westerfield's home, Dusek said, "Why would a normal 50-year-old guy have pictures of young naked girls?"

With some of the images of elementary-school aged girls, naked and exposing their genitals, flashing on the courtroom wall behind him, Dusek pointed at Westerfield and said, "These are his fantasies."

Westerfield stared toward the empty witness stand, never looking at the photos.

Dusek acknowledged that "if (Westerfield) is the guy, that destroys all our senses of protection."

"That's the scariest part — he was a normal guy down the street," said Dusek.

Defense lawyer Feldman promised jurors the heart of his argument Wednesday, but in a little more than an hour before the panel, he seemed to be hoping for a hung jury. He presented jurors with a list of "Jury Responsibilities," several of which seemed aimed at encouraging any panelist for acquittal not to cave to pressure from other jurors.

One "responsibility" read "All of you have the right to have your feelings respected."

Just before court broke for the day, Feldman held up a blank piece of posterboard and said, "This is the only evidence they have of David Westerfield in the van Dam residence."

He suggested the van Dam's swinging lifestyle endangered their children.

"You don't know what pervert is coming in the door when you're in the bar, drunk, making invites," he said.

 
Comprehensive case coverage


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,141-1,144 next last
To: VRWC_minion
You can have Dusek on your team...I'd take Feldy...

VDA/TJ
681 posted on 08/07/2002 3:49:43 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: mommya

You are correct. Ma'am. That is what they are instructed to do. DUSEK is lying. DUSEK wants them to do it his way.

682 posted on 08/07/2002 3:50:11 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: MagnoliaMS
CourtTV has done a real hatchet job on Feldman and his closing today

I did, and that is why I had posted about it changing the jurors minds. Unbelievable !! I just don't understand why ALL those people who are attorneys, both prosecution and defense lawyers's...say the same thing. No one praised his style, or content.

Isn't that ODD ? Is this political ? Is this a plea to an unsequestered jury ? Not normal in my book.

Is this...GET A GUILTY VERDICT TO MAKE A STATEMENT TO PERPS ??

683 posted on 08/07/2002 3:50:25 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
All these images, you can't remember...all these confessions in your head and you can't remember what's important... the testimony...sleepy..sleepy...your eyelids are heavy...you can't identify....you can tell...see pink...sleepy it was so much...facts weren't met...satements were made...yeah right, "truth"...it was PACKED with lies...The cops just followed him blindly and confirmed every little bit.. yeah, right...You were made a promise...There was supposed to be evidence...No evidenc that anyone has been inside that motor home....No one has even come close to fulfilling that promise, that little STATEMENT... that attempt to HOOK ... lost feed
684 posted on 08/07/2002 3:50:42 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Reminds me of an old episode of 'Tails From The Dark Side'.An old guy dies and doesn't know it. He sits at the dinner table decaying and doesn't have a clue, until he sneezes and blows his nose off.

That is FUNNY!! I love it. I was a fan of the program.

685 posted on 08/07/2002 3:50:56 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: spectre
You win

sw

666 posted on 8/7/02 6:45 PM Eastern by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

686 posted on 08/07/2002 3:50:57 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: spectre
LOL...that's ok Spec...it is not a curse...BTW...Dusek has a Potty Mouth...
687 posted on 08/07/2002 3:51:51 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
And how Dusek said, "And Barbara will tell you........."

Did he REALLY say that?

688 posted on 08/07/2002 3:52:21 PM PDT by MagnoliaMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Bravo...incredible HTML mastery...
689 posted on 08/07/2002 3:52:57 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
Accuses Feldman of trying to either milk or create some media synergy. Talk about cybucal nerve.

Says there was absolutely NO risque behavior in the garage.

690 posted on 08/07/2002 3:52:59 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
You can have Dusek on your team...I'd take Feldy...

I'd take Feldy too but he is far more worried about the case then you folks are and apparently Dusek isn't. They seem to both believe that the best case scenario for Westerfield is a single hold out.

691 posted on 08/07/2002 3:53:24 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: MagnoliaMS
Defense attorney Steven Feldman makes his closing argument in David Westerfield's murder trial Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2002, in San Diego.  Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam. (AP Photo/Dan Trevan, POOL)
Wed Aug 7, 4:52 PM ET

Defense attorney Steven Feldman makes his closing argument in David Westerfield's murder trial Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2002, in San Diego. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam. (AP Photo/Dan Trevan, POOL)

692 posted on 08/07/2002 3:53:26 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I'd take Feldy, too, any day over Dusek. The taxpayers in SD are throwing their money in the rubbish bin paying his salary.
693 posted on 08/07/2002 3:54:25 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
And how Dusek said, "And Barbara will tell you........."

Just to be fair, Feldie did promise to tell us about Bill Libby and didn't.

694 posted on 08/07/2002 3:54:43 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
With all due respect,

Feldman is hoping he can get at least one holdout for a hung jury while Dusek is worried about a single holdout too.

Your opinion is that Feldman is trying to get ONE juror to HANG the JURY because you believe MOST of the JURY will vote guilty.

Your opinion is that DUSEK is trying to get to that ONE HOLDOUT and get him to go along with EVERYONE ELSE because you believe EVERYONE ELSE is going to vote guilty.

You are basing this on DUSEK's statement, which is posted a few replies back. So, Maybe DUSEK thinks what you are thinking.

I don't think Feldman does. IMO.

Why are those in the "DW didn't do it" camp so different than these attorneys who apparently agree and who are closest to the case ?

Have you discussed this case with Feldman and Dusek.

695 posted on 08/07/2002 3:55:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
CORRECTION:

Why are those in the "DW didn't do it" camp so different than these attorneys who apparently agree and who are closest to the case ?

Have you discussed this case with Feldman and Dusek?

696 posted on 08/07/2002 3:56:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
But bugs can infest a nearly dead body as well.
697 posted on 08/07/2002 3:56:34 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: MagnoliaMS
You bet he said that in his opening statement. It's in the transcripts.
698 posted on 08/07/2002 3:56:39 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No, not really. Putting out an appearance of dismantling it, but not actually contradicting that each piece of circumstantial evidence must individually be weighed. The 21 game suggests that, but never stated so directly.
699 posted on 08/07/2002 3:58:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Anyone ever go on a picknick, sit under a tree & flies come swarming 'round, & you're not dead.
700 posted on 08/07/2002 3:58:24 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,141-1,144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson