Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Back to the orc research!

In The Letters of JRR Tolkien (#144) he writes:

Orcs (the word is as far as I am concerned actually derived from Old English orc 'demon', but only because of its phonetic suitablility) are nowhere clearly stated to be of any particular origin. But since they are servants of the Dark Power, and later of Sauron, neither of whom could, or would, produce living things, they must be 'corruptions'. They are not based on direct experience of mine; but owe, I suppose, a good deal to the goblin tradition (goblin is used as a translation in The Hobbit, where orc occurs once, I think) especially as it appears in George MacDonald, except for the soft feet which I never believed in. The name has the form orch (pl. yrch) in Sindarin and uruk in the Black Speech.

258 posted on 08/02/2002 5:46:16 PM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Overtaxed
You are as swift as Shadowfax!

So Orc is demon, as opposed to "Goblin" (which seems to me more closely related to ghost -- at least in our modern understanding). They're not far apart, really. But Goblin does sound less threatening (more Caspar-like than Satanic). I suppose the old word for demon seems more suitable, it certainly sounds more terrible than "goblin".

Maybe Tolkien did just like the sound of it better!

261 posted on 08/02/2002 9:58:34 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson