Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Quick Quiz
Self | 04-08-02 | Abundy

Posted on 04/08/2002 2:47:57 AM PDT by Abundy

Consider a man or woman, who knows they have never done anything illegal. Let’s call her Jane Doe. She answers the door one day and finds two police officers on her porch uninvited. They ask if they can come in to speak with her. She asks “why” and is politely told they would prefer to speak inside.

Answer the following questions with a yes or no answer.

1 – Is she doing something wrong if she says “no”?

2 – Is she doing something wrong if she says “do you have a warrant”?

3 – If she asks either of the previous questions does she have something to hide?

4 - If she asks question 1 and/or 2 is she a criminal?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; crime; society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Abundy
"No" X 4, clearly.
21 posted on 04/08/2002 9:13:06 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
My point exactly.
Of course, I would bet that the rest of the posters here would label the cop as "rude, crass, and unfeeling" if the scenario went something like this:

Officer #1: "Ms. Doe?"
Jane Doe: "Yes, may I help you?"
Officer #1: "Ms. Doe, may we come in please?"
Jane Doe: "Why?"
Officer #1: "I would prefer it if we could speak to you inside please."
Jane Doe: "No you may not come inside. Not without a warrant."
Officer #1: "Very well ma'm. Your husband/son/daughter was just killed in an auto accident. Whenever it is convenient for you, you may go to the Coroner’s office to identify the remains. I'm sorry for your loss. Good-bye."

But like I said, I don't have an irrational distrust for the police.

22 posted on 04/08/2002 9:16:11 AM PDT by cuz_it_aint_their_money
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Last time I checked constitutional protections applied to criminals as well as non-criminals.

Um ... in a lot of cases, they don't apply to anyone. The following articles list some examples.

Tyranny: The Threshold has Already Been Crossed

We are Not a Nation of Laws!

The Police State We Live In

The Sidestep Shuffle

23 posted on 04/08/2002 9:16:54 AM PDT by serinde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog;Squantos;harpseal;abundy;wardaddy;nunya bidness,PatrioticAmerican
How sad it would be to hassle officers tasked with the uncomfortable job of notifying a next of kin about a death.

Notify me on the porch. Sorry Hair, but I ain't signing up for a possible "pretext" entry where possibly corrupt LEOs will "see evidence of drugs in plain sight" (after they drop a small glasine vial of crack on the floor) leading to "probable cause" for a search where they will "find" more drugs, an illegal firearm part the size of a nail cliiper or something else on their way to a shakedown.

If you don't think that this happens, you have not been paying attention.

If it is really a genuine "next of kin" death notice visit, they should come with my priest or rabbi or at least my next door neighbor. Cops just showing up and "asking to be invited" inside is BS.

This is a pretext version of the "consent search" whereby armed cops "ask" to search your car, and if you do not "freely volunteer" you will spend the next 5 hours roadside minimum.

When always giving "consent" to armed police becomes virtually mandatory, the 4th amd means nothing and we are on our way to a police state. By NOT giving "consent" to every armed policeman who wants to give you a search, you are helping to preserve the 4th amd. By rolling over every time, you are helping to trash it.

24 posted on 04/08/2002 9:24:10 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cuz_it_aint_their_money;serinde
Bump to my last.
25 posted on 04/08/2002 9:25:12 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Sorry Hair, but I ain't signing up for a possible "pretext" entry where possibly corrupt LEOs will "see evidence of drugs in plain sight" (after they drop a small glasine vial of crack on the floor) leading to "probable cause" for a search where they will "find" more drugs, an illegal firearm part the size of a nail cliiper or something else on their way to a shakedown.

If you think this is a typical operating practice of police, I would encourage you to step away from the television once in awhile.

Look, I refuse to give this post more thought that the guy who wrote the vanity. He has presented us with a person who has apparently never broken a single law (his facts) who has some policemen at her door asking to speak with her. Then he asks some inane questions, of which all of us know the answers are "NO".

But you have decided that cops sit around and choose to go to the homes of these complete innocents and spread evidence around the house. I don't know what things must be like where you live, where they have run out of real criminals and are planting "illegal firearm parts" in the homes of innocent housewives... But it sounds nice if you really have so little real crime to fight that they are that bored.

If your point is to tell us to be cautious, I am sure you could find a better bandwagon than this scenerio. I know of better examples of abuse than this one, and I don't go looking for them.

26 posted on 04/08/2002 9:42:02 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
Considering that the law enforcement community is out of control, I'd ask "Why?", and if no response, then I'd say, "No."

If it was something that they simply needed her help on, they would state so, and then ask to come in. Anytime the police want into your house without telling you why, it is a suspicious request that should not be honored.

You may even be a target of criminal activity, if those agents are not actually agents.

You not required or compelled in any way to allow a law enforcement agent into your home unless that agent has a warrant to enter.

27 posted on 04/08/2002 9:42:07 AM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
1] NO

2] NO

3] MAYBE

4] NO

28 posted on 04/08/2002 9:43:10 AM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"Cops just showing up and "asking to be invited" inside is BS."

Exactly.

29 posted on 04/08/2002 9:43:36 AM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Hair, the police have procedures for notifying net of kin. Not telling you of the nature of their call before asking to come in is not part of the process. No honest cop ever refuses to tell you the nature of their call. In many cities, the police do not even bother to go to your door. They simply call you on the phone and tell you or ask you to come down.
30 posted on 04/08/2002 9:46:23 AM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
If it helps, I would probably not let the guys in either. I would sit down with them on the porch... but man-o-man you are quick to condemn the police. Too quick.
31 posted on 04/08/2002 9:48:19 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
I don't know what the procedures are for notifying next of kin, and I hope I never witness it for myself.

See my last post. I am not naive to your point. But I also have a lot of friends that are cops, and believe it or not, their goal is not to torment the citizenry. And, the best advice for protecting myself against rogues, has come from them.

32 posted on 04/08/2002 9:52:20 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
You need to check the links on police corruption, which I did not "see on TV", but have read on FR. These local stories never get aired beyond their home town, but do paint a worrisome picture.

But the greater issue is the strength of the 4th amd. As I have stated, when "voluntary consent" becomes virtually mandatory, we don't have a 4th amd any more.

Already we see police road side stops stretching the "failure to give consent" into "probable cause to search" by the use of truly Orwellian logic: "he would not 'volunteer' for a search, ergo he must be hiding something so I will search him anyway".

This may not bother you, and you may truly wish to bend over for police proctological exams on demand, but I do not. If cops come to my front door and want to "be invited inside", they will need to give me a good reason on the porch.

33 posted on 04/08/2002 9:56:10 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog ;Travis Mcgee
As a former deputy your both right...sad part is that it's not the 99% of honest LEO's who make ME think in a defensive manner regarding all things cop these days.........it's the one percenters who are worse than the criminal they seek that gives honest cops the "hassle" from honest citizens with nothing to hide.

The only way to correct such opinion /contempt of cop is for honest LEO/FLEAS to not put up with ciminal behavior or allow dishonesty among their ranks.............don't hold yer breath waiting for that to happen HOTdog.

Ya'll Stay Safe !

34 posted on 04/08/2002 9:58:05 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Squantos;Cap'n Crunch
Let's see what a real live one thinks.
35 posted on 04/08/2002 10:03:39 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
This may not bother you

That is where you are wrong about me, it would bother me a lot. And stories like your links are precisely why I suggested finding a better bandwagon to jump on than this one. No true scenarios are as clean as this example, and the example is in my way because it is not a believable pretext to abuse by cop.

Vehicle searches strike me as much different than our innocent housewife here. I have been pulled over. I am at least suspected of something or I would not have been pulled over. I will act very differently. No way are they searching my car without a warrant. And, I have had nothing to fear so far. I have been legally armed during every police stop in the last 15 years. After calmly telling them so, I have never once even been asked where it was, let alone had my car searched looking for it.

I am dang lucky to not fit the profile of the people they hassle. I am white, female, and quickly approaching middle age. I know they hassle young black kids, and I yell louder at my TV than anyone when I see them throw kids down and search their cars with no probable cause. I also wince when they find something. Abuse is abuse, but the instincts of those cops is alos often correct. At the same time that I will fight to uphold my rights, I am not going to be the one to get in their way if they want my help finding out who broke in to the house across the street. Real life is murkier than this example.

36 posted on 04/08/2002 10:14:30 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
No to all. Of course this will piss them off. Too bad. My wife is pretty saavy about folks....more so than I actually. If I see the cops in the driveway, I'd prefer to not even answer the door...LOL...or I'm going outside quickly to address them outside my home. Used to be when I was a kid and would get pulled over all the time for long hair, I would ALWAYS get out quick and walk back to meet the cop. Hands displayed of course.....nowadays...they get on the intercom and yell at you to stay put. I think some of them have seen too many "COPS" episodes. Funny, back in those days...70s...the cops could have cared less about guns...If they saw them then they'd relax and we'd have gun talk and maybe they would forget about probing around for that "Mare-Gee-Wana" they'd been snooping for in the first place. Hell, guns ..legal ones..like hunting rifles or a fine pistol were actually "icebreakers" for a folksy chat with John Law back than.

Man has that rapport gone to Hell in a handbasket...even here in the South.

Welcome Back btw.

37 posted on 04/08/2002 10:27:51 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
versus a fake dead one ?.........
38 posted on 04/08/2002 10:30:52 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
He appears to consider you non-real or un-live... sorry.

hehehehe

39 posted on 04/08/2002 10:38:11 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
no to all 4.
40 posted on 04/08/2002 10:45:13 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson