Posted on 09/19/2026 6:53:50 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The lone juror has come in from the cold to shine a much-needed light on the circumstances of the Lindsay Clancy trial, as well as certain media accusations that were tossed his way.
Michael Desronvil went public only days after he was doxxed by Boston-area legacy media and nationwide social media.
Desronvil was blunt in his response to the three jurors who misrepresented his stance during the trial, along with tacitly encouraging individuals attempting to track him down and expose him to ridicule and harassment. From his point of view, the majority of the female jurors were activists who “wanted her [Lindsay Clancy] found not guilty on Day 1.”
None were interested in hearing his interpretation of the evidence presented in court, instead resorting to badgering and nagging. This is easy to accept after seeing their attitudes and rhetoric in the interviews released over the past week.
Desronvil spoke out on Fugitive TV, a notable black political podcast. Host Ray Marcel talked with him on the phone for an hour, and stated that he was “very well spoken, very nice, very kind.” It was also revealed that, along with being a Catholic, Desronvil is a registered Republican. No wonder the feminist jurors lost their minds. (Asmongold commented, “Christ spent forty days in the desert. He spent forty hours with hags.”)
The interview also straightened out a number of accusations thrown his way by media sources while he was incommunicado and unable to defend himself, in particular one insinuation that he was guilty of domestic violence. The truth is that after he was married, Desronvil learned that his wife had lied about her immigration status and was, in fact, an illegal. This put his own legal status in jeopardy, so Desronvil initiated divorce proceedings. It was only then that accusations
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Adding on to what I just posted: I also think she may have been overcharged, and the State took on a burden (First Degree Murder) that was the hardest to prove under the circumstances in this case as I understand them.
Because MA does not have capital punishment, Murder One is an unusual charge there - even the most depraved murders there are usually charged in the Second Degree. I don't know the thought process behind the State's case, but if they re-try I think they will not use Murder One as the premise of their case.
FTA
Juror Michael Desronvil went public days after he was doxxed by Boston-area legacy media and nationwide social media. Desronvil spoke out on “Fugitive TV,” a noteworthy Black podcast. Host Ray Marcel stated that Desronvil was “very well spoken, very nice, very kind.” A Catholic, Desronvil is a registered Republican.
No wonder the radical feminist jurors lost their minds. (“Christ spent forty days in the desert. Desronvil spent 40 hours w/ a bunch of hags.”)
Desronvil responded to those who misrepresented his stance during the trial, as they sap-happily broke the law and encouraged individuals to track him down and expose him to ridicule and harassment.
The astute Desronvil viewed the female jurors as “activists” who “wanted Lindsay Clancy found not guilty from Day 1.
None were interested in hearing his objective insights into the evidence, instead the feminist hags resorted to badgering and nagging him.
Well, he might as well speak out. Heck, he ought to run for office, because his days of privacy are over.
“...majority of women...” Wh gives a F@#$? We know that the defense packed the jury with wokies. We know that the prosecutor was incompetent in not weeding these out.
What we want to know from you is about the two soy-boys . E.g., did they take the knee immediately or wait until their S&M desires had been satisfied by being publically berated by the harpies?
How could so many of the Mass. jurors be Bat-S crazy?
Because its Massachusetts.
Right on.
white leftist females are a curse on America.
“How could so many of the Mass. jurors be Bat-S crazy?”
Ask what the country believed prior to the 19th amendment. Same answer to the question you just asked.
“I’m quite sure the first vote (if they did that, it’s not a requirement) wasn’t 11-1.”
I believe he said that the initial vote was 8-4 in LC’s favor.
There is another way to look at it... there were eleven holdouts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.