Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/19/2026 6:53:50 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The lone juror has come in from the cold to shine a much-needed light on the circumstances of the Lindsay Clancy trial, as well as certain media accusations that were tossed his way.
Michael Desronvil went public only days after he was doxxed by Boston-area legacy media and nationwide social media.
Desronvil was blunt in his response to the three jurors who misrepresented his stance during the trial, along with tacitly encouraging individuals attempting to track him down and expose him to ridicule and harassment. From his point of view, the majority of the female jurors were activists who “wanted her [Lindsay Clancy] found not guilty on Day 1.”
None were interested in hearing his interpretation of the evidence presented in court, instead resorting to badgering and nagging. This is easy to accept after seeing their attitudes and rhetoric in the interviews released over the past week.
Desronvil spoke out on Fugitive TV, a notable black political podcast. Host Ray Marcel talked with him on the phone for an hour, and stated that he was “very well spoken, very nice, very kind.” It was also revealed that, along with being a Catholic, Desronvil is a registered Republican. No wonder the feminist jurors lost their minds. (Asmongold commented, “Christ spent forty days in the desert. He spent forty hours with hags.”)
The interview also straightened out a number of accusations thrown his way by media sources while he was incommunicado and unable to defend himself, in particular one insinuation that he was guilty of domestic violence. The truth is that after he was married, Desronvil learned that his wife had lied about her immigration status and was, in fact, an illegal. This put his own legal status in jeopardy, so Desronvil initiated divorce proceedings. It was only then that accusations
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
How could so many of the Mass. jurors be Bat-S crazy?
It was a great strategic move for his lawyer to have him come forward and take the sensationalism of outing the man away from the shthead media.
He’ll never feel safe in that crap hole and should take Governor DeSantis up on his invitation to relocate to Florida.
This entire trial is symbolic of America; white leftist females victims sitting in consequential positions throughout the nation destroying our laws, businesses, towns, and children
Quite so. Brilliant! A++++++
Salem.
“How could so many of the Mass. jurors be Bat-S crazy?”
Leftism. It is not meant to be functional. It is meant to destroy. The fools in MA first tolerated then adopted it. They are insane and angry.
Madness lashes out at the innocent.
Their minds are broken by their failed delusions “not being so” -as Ronald Reagan observed.
Sir, don’t fool yourself into thinking this “Bat-S crazy” insanity is localized only to Massachusetts.
A lot of people think that drawing a dotted line on a map will identify the cause of this kind of Leftist stupidity. It won’t, and it softens and minimizes the problem.
I guarantee that if this took place in any number of other states, it might not have been a mistrial by 11-1, it might have been a mistrial by 7-5, but this perverted and twisted Feminist mindset exists in every single state in this Union.
I’m guessing you haven’t been to Massachusetts. Even a short visit will be enough to explain.
To register your opinion on the Lindsay Clancy case, you can contact the Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office or write a letter to the court handling the case at the Plymouth Superior Court.
The trial recently ended in a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after a jury deadlocked 11-1 in favor of finding Clancy not criminally responsible by reason of insanity.
Legal proceedings remain active as prosecutors evaluate whether to pursue a retrial, with the next major status hearing scheduled for September 29, 2026.
You can reach the primary entities involved through the channels outlined below.
1. The Prosecution (To express opinions on a potential retrial)The District Attorney’s office represents the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and is solely responsible for deciding whether to drop the charges, negotiate a plea deal, or seek a new trial.
Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office
District Attorney Timothy J. Cruz
Phone: (508) 584-8120
Mailing Address:Main Office
166 Main Street
Brockton, MA 023012.
2. The Court (To submit formal written correspondence)While judges make their decisions strictly based on the law and evidence presented in court—not public opinion—letters regarding high-profile cases can technically be sent to the clerk’s office to be placed in the case file. Judge William Sullivan is the presiding judge.
Entity: Plymouth Superior Court (Clerk’s Office)
Phone: (508) 747-8400
Mailing Address: Plymouth Superior Court
52 Obery Street
Plymouth, MA 02360
Do not attempt to contact jurors: Following the mistrial, the identities of the 12 jurors and alternates have been indefinitely impounded and shielded by the judge due to privacy concerns and online harassment. Attempting to identify, contact, or harass jurors is illegal.
Keep correspondence professional: When writing or calling, clearly reference the defendant’s name (Lindsay Clancy). Keep your remarks concise, focused, and respectful of the legal process.
The man is a hero, like Kyle Rittenhouse.
Clancy Female Jurors Teamed Up During Trial....... and Lined Up Media Tour for themselves
These self-serving jurors——outed as radical feminists——are
making the murders of three children all about themselves.
One astonishingly chatty juror has been thrust into the public limelight to explain to Americans how the murder of three kids can be “excused” by postpartum psychosis. Paula Devlin has been highly willing to give the public a disturbing view of the jury’s decision to turn the case into a “radical feminist” cause.
“Tell-all Devlin” admitted to NBC 10 that several jurors .......during the jury deliberations, no less..... planned to do a joint interview about the Clancy case after the trial.
Devlin insisted......”we really wanted to talk about post-
partum. We really wanted to get that conversation going.”
This revelation makes a clear case for a wrongful decision necessitating a mistrial.
The female jurors disregarded the rules knowing they were supposed to be impartial.
Feminazi idelaogy prevailed.....they were determined to (a) manipulate the media, to (b) make the murder of three little children based on their own personal radical views.
Even more egregious, these self-serving jurors——radical
feminists——are making the case all about themselves.
If it was the father that killed, those hags would have brought the rope and built the gallows themselves.
i am still fuming that he was outed
jurors should be allowed to remain private if they choose
any one involved in releasing data about the juror
should be sued
Massachusetts liberals? Pffft! Those guys are pikers. Harris carried the state by just over 25 points. You want some real loons, come out here to CA. She carried San Francisco County by just over 64 points
And how did a conservative religious man manage to be part of the jury?
Because he’s black, of course, and the lawyer “assumed”…
I doubt that will deter the Blue Haired Gang.
Have you ever been on a criminal jury? I have, and I understand what happened here perfectly.
I'm quite sure the first vote (if they did that, it's not a requirement) wasn't 11-1.
There was a coalition of jurors who should have been excluded during voire dire, but weren't because the prosecutor was too dim to grasp that there was a feminist argument for "not guilty".
That group, maybe 3 or 4, wore down most of the others during deliberations, women who were susceptible to feminist praxis and two weak men. The more they deliberated, the more the living paralyzed "Mom" who the jury met in the courtroom every day (but who wisely did not testify) came to the front of mind, and the more the murdered children receded.
The genius of twelve was never more clearly shown than in this event.
In this case, the one man who wasn't absorbed into the Boston-area feminist hive mind "he just didn't GET IT", saw his service to the dead children as foremost, and proved (again) the wisdom of the jury system at its best.
My one criminal case was a re-trial of a convicted armed robber who was granted a retrial on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel (which of course we were not allowed to know when we deliberated). That outcome, retrial for ineffective assistance, is very, very rare as we later found out. Our first vote was 10-2 "not guilty", and it took quite a while for us to reach a verdict (that's a whole other story).
Lindsay Clancy's defense was brilliant, obviously not having her testify was key, the law that the jury was instructed on is unusual (MA is the only state where the State has to DISPROVE insanity), and the prosecutor didn't do a very good job - as in most single-party states, jobs like that are given to hacks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.