Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/17/2026 8:07:28 AM PDT by simpson96
When TMZ DC asked Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) about Lindsay Clancy's murder case this week, she was blunt. In fact, I think she said exactly what a lot of people have been thinking but are generally too polite to say out loud.(snip)
When TMZ DC’s Jacob Wasserman mentioned Reddington’s pardon request to Mace, she vented her uninhibited opinion. "Which is how retarded it is," she said. "He knows, as an attorney in the state of Massachusetts, you can't ask for a federal pardon for a state case. I mean, it doesn't take a lawyer — I’m not even a lawyer, I didn't go to law school — it doesn't take a lawyer to figure that out. It was just a publicity stunt. I think it's nasty; it's ugly."
Mace had more to say on the subject. "Her children are dead. She should be dead, too," she averred. "She should get the death penalty. It should be public. It should be a public execution."
I don't think Wasserman could wrap his head around what she was saying, and he pushed to spell out exactly what she meant: "So when you say public execution, spell that out for me."
If he expected her to walk it back, he was very wrong.
Mace laid it out. "It could be by a firearm, it could be electric chair — I don't really care. Not an injection," she said, adding that it should stand as "a warning to women everywhere. You don't kill your kids." When Wasserman suggested that might be "a little out of bounds," Mace rejected his premise outright and doubled down. "Absolutely not," she said. "Child rapists, too — add them to the list of public executions. If people can get away with murdering children, what else can they do?"
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
My two cents, and hope/prayer, is that many in MA will experience come-to-Jesus epiphanies between the last trial and the next one. It’s POSSIBLE that a different jury will do the right thing. (Not probable.)
None of what you said makes sense. She plotted to kill her children down to the last detail and then did it. Mental illness had nothing to do with it.
Ain’t we all a little crazy at times?
She murders three and is about to walk free. Bama woman tosses newborn into dumpster and gets life. Just shows you where to go if you want to murder you kids.
Crazy, by Seal
https://youtu.be/4Fc67yQsPqQ?si=vegE1dG_7lvYflN9
“I’m sure tho our favorite lesbian governor will wade right in and issue a state pardon…once things have settled a bit - surrounded with a gaggle of demon possessed women to cheer her on.”
I am sad and sicked to say that I can absolutely see that happening.
That doesn’t sound like justice to me; it sounds like revenge.
To me:
It sounds like justice for Cora.
It sounds like justice for Callan.
It sounds like justice for Dawson.
Things will never settle a bit for this murderess, whether she is free or not. Deservedly so. She may as well have a red letter "M" tattooed on her forehead.
Justice should be dispensed calmly, impersonally and rationally; not from a position of anger. The purpose of Justice is not to ‘get even’ or seek revenge.
Seriously, for whom is that?
A jury? The court of public opinion?
Hang with an exercise band, wound around twice.
Didn't used to be.
It wasn’t addressed to you personally.
I don’t think the poster was advocating being soft-on-crime; I think he or she was sadly reflecting how far we have fallen in terms of justice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.