Posted on 09/05/2026 1:41:53 PM PDT by Red Badger
Some intriguing information has come out regarding the feelings of the female jurors after they failed in their quest to let Lindsay Clancy get away with murdering her three little children. And it's safe to say they were not happy.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Judge William Sullivan officially declared a mistrial today in the Clancy murder trial while defense attorney Kevin Reddington melted down.
Reddington later asked the Massachusetts Supreme Court for relief, which was denied.
This was all made possible allegedly due to one brave male juror who refused to give in to bullying from both Clancy's defense team and the female jurors.
Following Judge Sullivan's declaration of a mistrial, CNN's Jean Casarez shared some very interesting details regarding the reactions of the female jurors, all of whom wanted Clancy to walk.
First, all of the jurors were tense as the judge spoke. One female was in despair as she shook her head, while another angrily clenched her fists.
Another woman was so distraught that she could not open her eyes.
Casarez then shared that another dismayed female juror pursed her lips while another nodded her head.
WATCH:
Female jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial were in total shambles as the judge declared a mistrial thanks to a lone holdout juror.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Postpartum is a few weeks and at the longest stretches to six months, and not many go there.
The youngest boy of hers she murdered, Callan, was 8 months old.
Machines carry all of the biases of their human programmers, unfortunately.
I think we now know that the ‘Hot/Crazy Matrix’ is a real thing....
.
The more I think about “robo-justice”, the more horrifying I find it.
And down the street from the courthouse, women were paying professional killers to dismember their children.
“..But can they find six of them with common sense?...”
In the MassHole capital of the world??? Highly unlikely.
The rules only allow so many jury candidates to be denied. Otherwise stacked juries one way or the other, would always be result.
What they need to deal with is the question of whether a psychotic person could do such meticulous planning and execution. Imho
I concur 100% with everything it stated...........
I think a lot of women just see this as a very late term abortion
Wow! There's an angle I hadn't thought of before.
I'd have trouble living with, or even trusting at all, a woman who wanted to acquit this Clancy creature.
👍........
This is a difficult case to prosecute to a jury of women. The world is changing. Truth hasn’t, but sometimes it doesn’t matter.
Yes........
Are there enough conservative women even available for jury duty in Massachusetts? Let alone men. Also, the next jury needs to be sequestered.
The defense will make sure no males are on the next jury.
The judge should have replaced every juror wearing pink in the jury box that demonstrated their preconceived belief in Clancy’s innocence. Or, at least, declared a mistrial due to the contamination of the jury.
Is this what "modern feminism" has become? ... or is that these particular "women" are nothing more than callous, soulless, inhumane creatures pretending to be decent, moral human beings?
I attribute it to a sick tribalism: women über alles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.