I see it as the one juror followed the judge’s instructions to the letter. His belief wasn’t popular so they bullied him and he stood his ground.
Even the judge, after he questioned each juror separately, said the guy had no problem with the instructions. He just had a different belief re guilty vs not guilty. Jurors are allowed to do that; that’s why we have the system we have.
Makes a person avoid MA, if you love life.
What I’ve just heard on FOX is that the one DID express doubt, but still refused to follow the instruction.
Unless members of the jury speak up, I guess we’ll never know. They have no obligation to explain themselves to the public.