Pro-Abortion Groups are Spending $100 Million to Take Over Congress

specifically to push pro-abortion propaganda. And, Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL) is spending $23.5 million.

That’s nearly $100 million, all aimed at one goal: flipping the U.S. Senate for Chuck Schumer, his pals at the DSA (Democratic Socialists of America), and the Abortion Lobby this November.

A new poll out of Texas shows Democrat James Talarico jumping to a 5-point lead over Attorney General Ken Paxton in the race for U.S. Senate – his largest lead of the entire general election. This is a race that could decide who controls the Senate.

This is the same James Talarico who claimed the Bible is pro-abortion and called himself a “Christian who hates Christianity.” If he can win in a state like Texas, I’m afraid it will only embolden the Abortion Lobby even more.

The poll was conducted by Texas Public Opinion Research, a group led by a Democratic strategist – so take their data with a grain of salt. But it was fielded by an independent pollster and covered by outlets across the state . . . and even USA TODAY.

Texas has been the Abortion Lobby’s crown jewel for over a decade. They know if they succeed in Texas, they can all but guarantee to seize the U.S. Senate. That’s why they’re pouring so many millions to flip it.

Then, they’ll have an open field to push their entire radical agenda including:

Granting statehood to Puerto Rico & Washington, D.C. to lock in four “blue” seats and securing Democrat control of the U.S. Senate for decades;

Codifying abortion-on-demand – nullifying pro-life state laws and putting more precious preborn babies’ lives in danger of abortion;

Funneling more taxpayer money to Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry; and

In Iowa, Republican Ashley Hinson (one of our bill champions!) is facing Democrat Josh Turek for the open seat left by Sen. Joni Ernst’s retirement – the first open Senate seat in Iowa in over a decade.

Ohio, North Carolina, and Georgia all have Senate seats in play too, with pro-abortion Democrats like Roy Cooper trying to ride the Abortion Lobby’s money into Washington, D.C.

If Republicans lose the Senate every pro-life law we’ve fought for since Dobbs is on the chopping block.

Right now, the Abortion Lobby has the money advantage, and Texas just showed us they intend to use it.

Thank you for referencing that article Morgana.

Pro-Abortion Groups are Spending $100 Million to Take Over Congress

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.

When are "asleep at the wheel," post-17th Amendment ratification patriots going to wise up to the constitutional reality that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the constitutionally limited power (hint), but now unconstitutionally big federal government the specific power to dictate, regulate, frustrate, tax and spend for national healthcare purposes, meaning no elite desperate Democratic vote-winning funding for murder of unborn children, Roe v. Wade a MAJOR Supreme Court scandal imo.

Unconstitutional federal funding for post-16th Amendment (direct taxes)-facilitated abortion funding should have stopped when Roe v. Wade was overturned imo.

State inspection laws, health laws, [all emphases added] and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as follows.
Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen [all emphases added], under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country. —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. —United States v. Butler, 1936.
16th Amendment: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived [emphasis added], without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors, shall all become wolves [emphasis added]. It seems to be the law of our general nature. —Thomas Jefferson (Letter to Edward Carrington January 16, 1787)

Planned Parenthood Loses in Court
Aug. 12, 2026, Daniel Seiden, bloombergnews.com

Medicaid fraud claims brought by a whistleblower who conducted an undercover investigation to determine whether Planned Parenthood and its affiliates provided fetal tissue to researchers and tissue procurement companies.......claims that Louisiana and Texas terminated the Medicaid eligibility of three Planned Parenthood affiliates in response to his investigation, but the affiliates continued to bill Medicaid in violation of the federal anti-fraud statute.

A three-judge appellate panel initially dismissed claims related to actions taken by Planned Parenthood’s attorney-employees, ruling that they have “absolute immunity” from Doe’s claims under federal common law. But the full Fifth Circuit, after vacating that ruling and taking up the case en banc, ruled Wednesday that the court can’t consider the organization’s appeal at this point in the case.

The en banc opinion rejected Planned Parenthood’s argument that the court could consider the attorney immunity issue under the collateral-order doctrine, a legal principal that allows immediate appeals of interim rulings in certain instances. That doctrine doesn’t apply in this case because “resolving the immunity question would not conclusively determine a separable legal issue in a way that meaningfully advances the litigation,” the en banc court wrote.

In addition, neither Texas or Louisiana state law provide a basis for the Fifth Circuit jurisdiction in the case, according to the opinion.

The lower court ruling at issue was authored by Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee. Hacker Stephens LLP represents Doe. O’Melveny & Myers LLP represents Planned Parenthood.

Planned Parenthood receives funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies, the charitable organization founded by Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg Law is operated by entities controlled by Michael Bloomberg.

The case is United States ex rel. Doe v. Planned Parenthood Fed. of Am. Inc., 5th Cir. en banc, No. 23-11184, 8/12/26.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.