Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mexico to offer alternative to bar exam — as critics slam state for another woke example of lowering academic standards
NY Post ^ | 8/08/26 | Angela Barbuti

Posted on 08/08/2026 3:24:52 PM PDT by Libloather

They’re lowering the bar.

New Mexico is the newest state in the country to offer an alternative to the traditional bar exam — which critics bashed as yet another woke example of lowering academic standards.

New Mexico has become the latest state to give law school graduates an alternative to the traditional bar exam, allowing them to earn a license by completing 675 hours of supervised legal work under an attorney or approved host organization.

Law school grads will now be able to get their license after finishing 675 hours of supervised legal work under an attorney or host organization, the state’s supreme court announced Tuesday.

Graduates can still take the two-day bar exam, but supporters of the new program say hands-on legal work could be a better test of whether someone is actually prepared to practice law — while helping fill a shortage of attorneys in rural parts of the state.

New Mexico’s court explained that two-thirds of its counties have less than one attorney per every 1,000 residents, making them a region the American Bar Association refers to as a “legal desert.”

“This new option for admission to the practice of law also has the potential to increase the number of attorneys in New ⁠Mexico to address unmet legal needs, particularly in rural areas where it is difficult to find a lawyer,” New Mexico Chief Justice Julie Vargas said in a statement.

Critics bashed the alternative.

“Too dumb to pass the bar, so we back door them in,” one said on a KRQE News Facebook post.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Education; History
KEYWORDS: academic; barexam; exam; lawyers; newmexico; woke
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: clashfan

“Any law license obtained this way should to have an asterisk on it.”

Exactly right.


21 posted on 08/08/2026 4:25:13 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys. P. J. O'Rourk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

I never pass a dive bar.

*********************************

Dive bars for me - US, Germany, Southeast Asia, Spain, Britain, Ukraine.

Language a problem on occasion but they’ll help you out.

If you can’t remember the local word for beer just look around - there will be beer signs on the walls. Saved me a few times (grin).


22 posted on 08/08/2026 4:30:04 PM PDT by dagunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

how much education do you need for cases like Crack possession or sales? let the low information crowd have their license... with the amount of judges letting people go, lawyers arent needed anymore...


23 posted on 08/08/2026 4:31:44 PM PDT by sit-rep (I may be Dumb, but I'm not Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

There is a rationale for the current system. The requirement of a law degree in order to become a lawyer is meant to assure a wide range of legal knowledge by lawyers. The problem of limited availability of lawyers is better addressed by expanding the numbers of and scope of work by paralegals.


24 posted on 08/08/2026 4:35:21 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Yes.


25 posted on 08/08/2026 4:38:16 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Smiles


26 posted on 08/08/2026 4:38:42 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Paralegals if competently supervised.


27 posted on 08/08/2026 4:40:09 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Hey, they already accept mail order diplomas!


28 posted on 08/08/2026 4:42:40 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They are doing it wrong. Keep the bar exam, remove the requirement to go to law school.

Students can learn all they need using an AI tool.


29 posted on 08/08/2026 4:44:10 PM PDT by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You’re probably thinking of Shakespeare’s famous line:

> **“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”**

It appears in ***Henry VI, Part 2*, Act IV, Scene 2**, spoken by **Dick the Butcher**, one of Jack Cade’s followers. ([Royal Shakespeare Company][1])

What’s interesting is that the line is **often misunderstood** as Shakespeare himself saying lawyers are terrible. In the scene, Cade’s rebellion is trying to overthrow the existing order. Immediately afterward, Cade attacks the written law and legal documents. ([Folger Shakespeare Library][2])

So there’s a strong argument that the joke is actually:

**If you want to destroy the rule of law and establish arbitrary power, lawyers are among the first people you need to get rid of.**

That’s why the line has acquired an almost opposite interpretation over the centuries: **lawyers can be obnoxious, but their existence makes tyranny harder.**

[1]: https://www.rsc.org.uk/henry-vi-part-ii/about-the-play/famous-quotes?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Famous Quotes | Henry VI Part II | Royal Shakespeare Company”
[2]: https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/henry-vi-part-2/read/4/2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Henry VI, Part 2 - Act 4, scene 2 | Folger Shakespeare Library”


30 posted on 08/08/2026 4:50:00 PM PDT by jroehl (And how we burned in the camps later - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

No, but those people I foresee will be causing general social justice havoc. Now if all of them become public defenders, bad news for defendants.


31 posted on 08/08/2026 5:00:05 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“This isn’t just about lowering standards for the lawyer”.
.
For lawyers, there isn’t a standard low enough...!


32 posted on 08/08/2026 5:20:43 PM PDT by Does so (Book:"The Party of Death"...Dem☭¢rats ™ ® © ≣ ½⅓⅔¼¾ ⅛⅜⅝⅞ ⅓ ⅕ ⅖ ⅗ ⅘ ⅙ ⅚)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why not just pass out politician licenses to go with the lawyer ducat
They seem to attract each other might be some nexus after all.


33 posted on 08/08/2026 5:44:26 PM PDT by Recompennation ( Deeeeeeeeezout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

There’s only one way to prevent this and that is to make the ambulance chasing part of the work accreditation be done using a car with a stick shift. ( Do I really need a “/s” label?)


34 posted on 08/08/2026 6:25:39 PM PDT by chickenlips (Neuter your politicians )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jroehl

Not so fast there, scholar. Dick the Butcher was a famous wrestler in the Detroit area when I was a young lad. He feuded regularly with Dick “Mr. Michigan” Garza and Bobo Brazilian to name a couple…


35 posted on 08/08/2026 7:00:01 PM PDT by 43north ("All dogs want to be Labradors and all Labradors want to be black." Stonnie Dennis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

Not even 4 months work for that few hours. (At only 40 hours per week, 2200 hours is just one year.)

And they will get credit for time served too.


36 posted on 08/08/2026 7:11:51 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Do the racist Islamics use their Communists as dupes? Or do the racist Communists use the Islamics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Did AOC pass her bar exam?


37 posted on 08/08/2026 7:25:57 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( My pronoun is EXIT. Generally full of /S -- Living with Havana Syndrome -infected from Main Stream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Of course. Nowadays, technology permits supervision and even client contact to be done remotely with paralegals doing much of the routine work. Drafting wills and simple divorces, for example, can be done in storefronts. I have wondered why the big personal injury firms do not set up such operations in order to generate a base of loyal clients.


38 posted on 08/08/2026 8:31:16 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Interesting question.
Maybe those victims law firms think running storefront clinics is beneath their dignity? Or just maybe they aren’t turned on by selling $29 wills at Walmart?

I agree that there’s room for a significant expansion of low cost clinics — which would need to rely primarily on low cost workers (and a lot k on c fill- in - the blank forms and AI)

I wonder if an entrepreneurial oriented investor like Musk might give it a serious go?


39 posted on 08/08/2026 9:26:10 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I say: Require both!

Applicants should complete the two-day bar examination and prove themselves with 675 hours of supervised work.

Regards,

40 posted on 08/08/2026 10:52:23 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson