Posted on 07/26/2026 7:51:39 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
*Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, “The Congress shall have Power …To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases over such District*
*A new amendment could be added to the Constitution to make D.C. a state. This would require Congress to propose an amendment and three-fourths of the nation’s state legislatures to ratify it.*
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Our leadership needs to play hardball with the race-baiting element. Statehood is not an issue outside D.C and our candidates need to bring it up-it's good politics to bring up teachable history.
Or just let the residents vote in Maryland elections and keep the federal buildings/property its own separate entity
I think that’s a good idea. That would take care of the argument that residents in DC do not have congressional representation. Make most of the District of Columbia, a part of Maryland again, and that takes care of that.
I think it IS an issue outside of DC. It would give the state two senators.
DC statehood: unconstitutional.
The racism charges are bunk but they’ve been able to get away for it too long. That’s why I say teachable. Newt’s was a history professor. His speeches gave listeners the feeling they were back at the university while working stiffs could easily understand and think they could have made it to college.
The threat of D.C. statehood is not there now. We should be proactive and welcome the discussion outside D.C. Think university campuses where high profile political leaders can challenge each other. Noteworthy comments would go viral and disturb the left, keeping them on defense.
D.C.’s original borders. Advocate them and watch the left explode. The strategy is to keep throwing them curves.
Republicans could promote this idea and then the entire statehood “question” becomes moot
Yep. Just tell Thune that the majority of Republicans want it.
**Or just let the residents vote in Maryland elections and keep the federal buildings/property its own separate entity**
**Make most of the District of Columbia, a part of Maryland again, and that takes care of that.**
Those were my thoughts in my RINO days-compromise. Now we see how the left plays and I say don’t give an inch. I’d tell them if they don’t like it they can move.
**DC statehood: unconstitutional.**
That term and the constitution itself means nothin to the left. If we’re proactive bringing it up we won’t have to defend a document that too many people don’t understand when it comes to the details.
**I think it IS an issue outside of DC. It would give the state two senators.**
Very good. The 2 senators issue would need no explanation and there are plenty of red states that could nip it in the bud. The left will then resort to other nefarious ways.
“””Yep. Just tell Thune that the majority of Republicans want it.””””
And it would be named Trumpville.
Liberals like to act like irritants until they get what they want.
Then there’s the 23rd Amendment. It too would have to be repealed via Constitutional Amendment. Giving MD back its donation minus government buildings would mean that anyone who might live in a government building would have the right to vote for three Electors.
But we need to go back to the reason that Congress has exclusive legislative control over the District. It was to prevent a hostile state government from holding government workers and officials hostage. I know that it’s hard to imagine a hostile state government targeting Federal office holders (cough, cough, Letitia James!!) but the Founders wisely foresaw such a possibility.
DC was created by the Constitution, Congress did not have the authority to return 1/3 of it to Virginia in 1846 so that the slave trade could continue in Alexandria, and Congress positively does not have the authority to admit the remaining 2/3 of the original District as a State.
It is possible that Congress could admit Puerto Rico as a State under certain circumstances.
If DC becomes the 51st state, that means the flag will need to be changed.
And guess what? They will propose a total redesign of the flag, instead of just adding an additional star.
You are so right but then you are confusing the issue with logic. Not much of it these days and everything illogical works in favor of the rats.
You can’t the Constitution makes DC a separate entity. Period,,,
Turkiye was protected for more than half a century by the Constitutional provision that the Army is the Protector of the Republic. The army took over twice during that time and cleaned out the would be communists and then stepped out of the picture. That ceased to work when Erdogan gradually removed the entire command structure of the army and replaced all of the Constitutionally minded judges. After that the dictatorship is in power for the forseeable future.
That does not accomplish the desired end. DC then would not add two Democrat Senators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.