Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USGCRP’s Fresh Head Brings Fresh Air To US Climate Science
American Thinker ^ | 22 Jul, 2026 | David R. Legates

Posted on 07/22/2026 5:43:15 AM PDT by MtnClimber

Climate science in the federal government is about to get a whole lot more honest.

The United States Global Change Research Program, or the USGCRP, was disbanded early last year. Created by an act of Congress in 1990, the goal of the USGCRP was to coordinate federal research and investments across fifteen federal member agencies to present a whole-of-government face to the federal government’s position on global environmental change. Now it has returned, but with a new and improved mission and leadership.

I served as Director of the USGCRP back in the latter days of the first Trump Administration; it was a trying time for me, to say the least. When the second Trump Administration began to take shape, I was asked if I wanted to participate. I firmly replied, “No thanks.”

What was the USGCRP? The USGCRP ran the website climatechange.gov and provided funding opportunities to various groups and individuals through its massive budget, which was $5.14 billion dollars in 2023. It also produced both the annual climate assessment to Congress and the semi-decadal National Climate Assessment.

But the only employees of the USGCRP from the federal government were its Executive Director and the Director of the National Climate Assessment. The remainder of USGCRP personnel were staffed by a company called ICF International Incorporated. ICF International has contracts throughout the federal government, most notably at the EPA, but it is a publicly traded consulting and technology services company located in Reston, Virginia. Many expressed concern about ICF International being in charge of the USGCRP because that meant one of the major players in shaping and presenting the federal government’s face of climate change was a progressive think tank masquerading as a federal agency.

But the congressional mandate to produce a National Climate Assessment still exists.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS:
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


1 posted on 07/22/2026 5:43:15 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Get rid of ICF first.


2 posted on 07/22/2026 5:43:30 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
..The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.

H.L. Mencken

That was written in 1920. He knew about the Global Warming scam even before the con artists made it up!

3 posted on 07/22/2026 6:07:01 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

.
It just shows you can not kill a government program


4 posted on 07/22/2026 7:01:41 AM PDT by CoastWatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CoastWatcher
.... It just shows you can not kill a government program..

It is possible. If the program actually succeeds in its mission . Billions were spent to land men on the Moon. After it succeeded the liberals ended it so the money could be wasted on one of their pet projects instead .

5 posted on 07/22/2026 7:08:48 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Great news! And I love this line:

...and has suggested that many positives exist within a warmer world

There are many benefits to living in the Modern Warm Period (higher crop yields, more predictable precipitation, less deaths by plagues) like there were in prior warm periods. And hopefully NASA will go back to producing climate change graphs similar to this:


6 posted on 07/22/2026 7:42:14 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson