Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Economic Illiteracy Fueling the Rise of Socialism?
AMAC Newsline ^ | 18 Jul, 2026 | Hunter Oswald

Posted on 07/19/2026 9:21:28 AM PDT by MtnClimber

Over the past several years, polling agencies and pundits have documented a disturbing trend: Increasingly, many Americans – especially young Americans – are struggling to comprehend the most foundational principles of economics. This growing economic illiteracy could have a potentially devastating effect on not only the country’s economic future, but its political identity and American democracy itself.

In 2022, the Cato Institute found that voters “displayed a depressing lack of understanding of basic economics,” especially when it came to the issue of inflation. This problem was particularly pronounced among young voters. In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Nonresident Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute Samuel J. Abrams wrote that “large shares of young adults [are] unable to define inflation, explain supply constraints, or predict the effects of price controls.”

This decline in economic literacy has coincided with a dramatic rise in support for collectivist ideals – more specifically, socialist and communist policies. Polling by the organization Victims of Communism conducted in 2020 found that around 40 percent of Americans viewed socialism favorably.

Additionally, in 2025, a Cato/YouGov poll found that around 62 percent of people under the age of 30 held a favorable view of socialism with 34 percent having a favorable view of communism – the ideology responsible for roughly 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. Poll after poll shows that Americans are embracing the false promise of the “warmth of collectivism” at an alarming rate, and that the shift toward socialism is being driven by profound ignorance about basic economic realities and the universal historical record of failure of socialist regimes.

Yet there is still hope. The antidote to fallacy, confusion, and collectivist temptation is knowledge and education – specifically about economics, a discipline that was once a major part of American civic life. Anyone can learn the basics of economics, or further his or her understanding.

But before making the case as to why one should study economics, it is important to begin by briefly taking a step back to answer another important question: What is economics? The word “economics” is derived from the Greek word oikonomia, meaning “household management.” To the ancient Greeks, particularly the thinkers Aristotle and Xenophon, the idea of oikonomia was centered on people’s stewardship of resources such that they could flourish and live a good life.

Today, economics has evolved far beyond its ancient roots. It’s also a social science, concerned not with abstract equations or sterile statistics, but with human beings and the choices they make. As the late Austrian economist Percy L. Greaves, Jr. once said, “Economics is not a dry subject. It is not a dismal subject. It is not about statistics.”

As Greaves points out, economics “is about human life. It is about the ideas that motivate human beings. It is about how men act from birth until death. It is about the most important and interesting drama of all — human action.” Economics is concerned with people, their interactions with others, and how those interpersonal relationships affect the ability of a society to produce, deliver, and consume goods and services.

More specifically, economics studies how people interact, cooperate, and respond to incentives. As a field of study, it is concerned with revealing the truth and principles that allow people to find answers to problems through business and commerce.

The study of economics does not teach what the “right” policy decisions are. The “right” tax rate or interest rate is ultimately a subjective judgment. Rather, as Shawn Ritenour, a professor of economics at Grove City College in Pennsylvania, puts it, “The object of economics is to discover economic principles that are true, so that policies developed in light of those principles will be suitable for achieving our goals.”

Learning economics helps us understand ourselves and the world around us. These principles are not academic abstractions. They explain the world as it is. Nobel laureate Gary Becker once said, “[Economics] will be judged on how well it helps us understand the world – and how it helps us improve it.”

The basic principles of economics go a long way toward illuminating why things are the way they are in our world. Take, for example, the famous law of supply and demand, which explains why prices rise and fall. When there is a low supply of a good and demand is high, the price of that good increases. When supply increases, the price falls.

This lesson is probably one that most Americans remember from Econ 101 – although certain members of Congress could probably use a refresher. But most Americans likely don’t know much about the law of scarcity, which outlines concepts like opportunity cost, incentives, and the margin, or the law of marginal utility, which reveals why we’re more satisfied with the first unit of a good we consume than the sixth.

These and various other economic principles can help us understand why certain individual actions and government policies have the effect that they do – and in turn make us more informed citizens and voters.

Increasing our society’s understanding of economics also helps people better detect economic fallacies and understand their damaging impact. As the economist Henry Hazlitt wrote, “Economics is haunted by more fallacies than any other study known to man. This is no accident.”

Hazlitt hits the mark when looking at today’s situation. Socialist politicians make their case by appealing to economic fallacies – such as the idea that the government can provide anything for “free” – so they can present themselves as self-anointed saviors that can solve all of society’s problems. These fallacies are built on ideas that conflict with reality and are easily recognizable to anyone with a basic understanding of economics.

The study of economics also reveals an important truth: economic freedom and political freedom are inseparable from one another. Milton Friedman saw this when he authored his book Capitalism and Freedom.

“Economic arrangements play a dual role in the promotion of a free society,” Friedman wrote. “On the one hand, freedom in economic arrangements is itself a component of freedom broadly understood, so economic freedom is an end in itself. In the second place, economic freedom is also an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom.”

Free market societies recognize individuals as self-governing in their capacity to make decisions through voluntary cooperation, not through the threat of coercion. Hazlitt made this point when he wrote Man vs The Welfare State. “The solution to our problems is not more paternalism, laws, decrees, and controls,” Hazlitt argued, “but the restoration of liberty and free enterprise.”

From the Soviet Union to Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea, the historical record of collectivism is grim indeed. Even China, now the world’s second-largest economy, has only been able to succeed insofar as it has introduced market-oriented reforms to its socialist system. Still, U.S. per capita GDP remains roughly 6.5 times greater than China’s.

Economic freedom isn’t simply a policy preference. As Friedman said, it is a “necessary condition” for a free society, paving the way for human flourishing. A society that is economically literate understands that liberty cannot survive on economic myths. It survives on citizens who understand the principles that make freedom possible.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: captainobvious; leftism

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: MtnClimber

Ignorance, disillusionment, and envy fuel socialism - which doesn’t fix any of them.


21 posted on 07/19/2026 9:39:54 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
They will be in for a rude awakening.


22 posted on 07/19/2026 9:40:41 AM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Economics in One Lesson. Hazlitt. Required reading in home school.


23 posted on 07/19/2026 9:40:53 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Supply and demand. Price of gas at the pump.
Government intervention. Obamacare


24 posted on 07/19/2026 9:42:25 AM PDT by Texas resident ( We finally have an American President again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Sad but true.


25 posted on 07/19/2026 9:44:29 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Economics is the social science that studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and societies allocate scarce resources to satisfy unlimited wants and needs. In basic language, it’s called supply and demand and how to get to that. So this whole article is fine but has for many years been recognized as to how and why it is being accomplished. It was done with the dumbing down of public education. Critics, historians, and education advocates generally point to several key eras and milestones that fundamentally altered the focus of American education over the last century basically starting in the 1930’s with the dump of the market and the easy ticket.

And with this alteration came the acceptance of society and life over wanting to level up your work, habits, or personal life. And the key is shifting from a mindset of iterative improvement to passive waiting for things to simply become easier or for perfect inspiration to strike in the end by someone else that probably wouldn’t know it if it bit them on the azz because that’s what they were told to do.

During our history, man went from something that knew nothing to something on the way to that status over the thousands of years we have been around. So we are going full circle on our way to obscurity. And the ones that are conducting the manipulation are not required to care who you are. (Just that you do what you are told) Pretty soon they won’t even tell you. They’ll just consider you in the way.

wy69


26 posted on 07/19/2026 9:45:29 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Illiteracy along with extreme fraudulent elections...


27 posted on 07/19/2026 9:45:59 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Illiteracy along with extreme fraudulent elections...


28 posted on 07/19/2026 9:45:59 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Yes, I remember my paper route too. I lived in Fargo but delivered the Minneapolis Tribune, seven days a week. As I recall only a dozen or so customers for Monday through Saturday, but about 30 or 40 for the Sunday paper.
As I recall people paid for the subscriptions directly to the Tribune and I did not need to worry about collection.

But your point is well taken, even a job like a paper route can teach basic economics. It is like getting your first pay check: the difference between gross and net pay.


29 posted on 07/19/2026 9:46:52 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Took macro and micro at the community college. 3 units each. Couldn’t believe why we needed them other than it was a humanities requirement. Then I heard someone on the radio say what we don’t need is more economists but more ECONOMIZERS. Classes were a waste of time.

The ‘lab sciences’ course requirement was a geology course with a field trip. The trip part of the course ended up getting cancelled. Go figure.


30 posted on 07/19/2026 9:46:54 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

when 80% of the electorate are economic illiterates then 80% of the elected will be economic illiterates ...


31 posted on 07/19/2026 9:48:51 AM PDT by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
The economic illiteracy is intentional, and pushed by the same people who want to spread Communism.



32 posted on 07/19/2026 9:51:36 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

They are foreigners who should all be deported.


33 posted on 07/19/2026 9:54:25 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

That was the entire purpose of the “dept of education”, to ensure kids were not taught and brainwashed into communism.


34 posted on 07/19/2026 9:55:11 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Importing the third world fueled the rise of socialism …almost like that was the plan.


35 posted on 07/19/2026 9:58:37 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

and letting females vote ...


36 posted on 07/19/2026 9:59:51 AM PDT by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No, a really bad economy and a horrible outlook on the future for young people is what is fueling it.

Econ classes mean nothing. Seeing a prosperous economy for the masses and a good quality of living is what works. Living proof. And hard to do with trillions of debt. How do you sell that crap as the way to go? LOL


37 posted on 07/19/2026 10:00:56 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

But Laissez-Faire Globalization is doomed to failure too.

There has to be balance.


38 posted on 07/19/2026 10:03:03 AM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Left have dumbed down our youth so much in the last 50 years that a Communist takeover was inevitable. That was their plan until Trump came along and ruined it.

We now have a generation of young people who did not experience life with and alongside the threat of Communism. To them, all they know of Communism is what they see in China on TV and in movies. And to them it looks very good and not so different that what we have in our Capitalist society.

They have been taught by Leftists from Kindergarten to PHD that Communism is a good thing and Capitalism is evil.

Is it any wonder that they would choose Communism instead of Freedom and Liberty under a Capitalist system?..............


39 posted on 07/19/2026 10:05:45 AM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

it actually starts before Kindergarten with sesame street type shows ...


40 posted on 07/19/2026 10:07:24 AM PDT by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson