Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

600 mile range, 9 minute charge....20 year life.
1 posted on 07/09/2026 5:43:29 PM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: delta7

Silver has nowhere to go but up.

It’s a much better investment than gold at this point in time.


2 posted on 07/09/2026 5:45:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Israel über alles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

“600 mile range” probably translates to optimum conditions like local driving speed. Probably closer to 400 mile range while driving at 75 - 80 mph. Still impressive IMHO.


3 posted on 07/09/2026 5:47:58 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

Blah...blah...blah... been hearing about these silver based batteries for a year. If they are the real deal the increase in silver prices will make them less affordable than lithium batteries.


6 posted on 07/09/2026 5:52:55 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

I just researched with several different search engines. They all provided the same basic response:

“”Yes, fast charging can cause unique stress on Solid-State Batteries (SSBs). While they are known for higher safety and energy density than standard lithium-ion, extreme fast charging (XFC) risks causing irreversible structural wear, microscopic cracks in the solid electrolyte, and increased internal resistance.””


7 posted on 07/09/2026 5:53:53 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7
To: delta7

Another silver-pumping article. Commision?

This time it's Samsung's experimental silver-carbon solid-state battery that’s supposedly going to drive massive new demand.

A few reality checks:

The tech is still in development with mass production optimistically targeted for 2027.

Many solid-state battery promises have slipped timelines before. Even if it works, the silver layer is only 5 micrometers thick — we’re talking tiny amounts per battery, not some game-changing industrial consumption surge.

Engineers hate using expensive silver when cheaper substitutes exist. We’ve seen this before with copper — lots of applications switched to aluminum for wiring and conductors precisely because silver and copper are price-sensitive.

If this silver-carbon approach gets expensive, they’ll look for alternatives or use it only where absolutely necessary.

This reads more like silver bull marketing than a sober assessment of battery chemistry trends. We’ve seen these “silver to the moon because of EVs/tech” stories for years.

The cycles rarely deliver the promised moonshot LOL.
9 posted on 07/09/2026 5:57:06 PM PDT by CandyFloss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

so invest in silver!


10 posted on 07/09/2026 6:01:37 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7; All

Is There Enough Silver for Solid-State Batteries, Solar Cells, and AI Chips?

Short answer: there's plenty of silver in the Earth's crust in raw terms, but nowhere near enough running through actual mines and reserves to cover the silver-carbon EV battery, AI chip and Solar industries at any real scale.

The Numbers

Silver makes up roughly 0.05–0.075 ppm of the Earth's crust by mass. With a crust mass around 2.5×1022 kg, that works out to something like 1.5–2 trillion tonnes of silver total — an astronomically large number compared to any conceivable industrial demand. There's no fundamental scarcity of silver atoms in the planet.

The catch is that almost all of that silver is spread so thinly through ordinary rock that it's not economically recoverable. What actually matters is proven reserves and mining capacity: global reserves are estimated around 530,000–640,000 tonnes, and annual mine production is only about 25,000–26,000 tonnes a year — mostly as a byproduct of copper, lead, and zinc mining, not primary silver mining.

Scaling to Samsung's Battery

Reports on the silver-carbon anode layer suggest roughly 1 kg of silver per 100 kWh EV pack. Retrofitting the ~1.5 billion vehicles on the road today would take about 1.5 million tonnes of silver, more than double current global reserves. Even limiting it to new production going forward — around 80–90 million vehicles a year — would require 80,000–90,000 tonnes of silver annually, roughly 3x current global mine output, which already has to cover electronics, solar panels, jewelry, and investment demand.

Scaling to AI Chips

Silver is also used in chip packaging and bond wires for conductivity. The global semiconductor packaging industry, covering roughly 1.15 trillion chips a year — nearly all cheap and simple — consumes about 1,200–1,500 tonnes of silver annually, an average of around 1 mg per chip. That average is dragged down by trillions of small commodity chips; denser packages use far more, from 200–300 mg in a smartphone up to 1–3 g in a laptop, TV, or game console.

Large AI accelerator chips are dense, high-pin-count packages closer to that laptop-or-console end of the range. Applied to a stated production target of 100–200 billion AI chips a year, that puts silver demand at roughly 100,000–400,000 tonnes annually — several times more than the entire world currently mines in a year.

Bottom Line

Add the two together and a single year of combined demand — 80,000–90,000 tonnes for EV batteries plus 100,000–400,000 tonnes for AI chips — could run from roughly 180,000 to nearly 500,000 tonnes, against a current annual mine supply of just 25,000–26,000 tonnes and total proven reserves of only 530,000–640,000 tonnes. Layer on solar power's own fast-growing silver appetite, and three major industries end up competing for a supply that can't expand quickly, since most of it comes as a byproduct of copper, lead, and zinc mining rather than from dedicated silver mines. Closing that gap would take a major, sustained expansion of silver mining and sharply higher prices, not just faster demand growth.

11 posted on 07/09/2026 6:22:11 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

IATG

IACF


12 posted on 07/09/2026 6:23:54 PM PDT by kiryandil (Democraps are gay-Islamic-race-communists )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7
The Battery That Just Beat Toyota. What It Means for Silver.

Same technology, same Silver pumping song 2 months ago, same Silver pumper. Life under the bridge must be hard.
13 posted on 07/09/2026 6:26:28 PM PDT by CandyFloss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7; Allegra
What about the new batteries that are made using Reyna cryptocurrency as an anode?

Maybe those will drive the price of Reyna bucks up above $130 a pop.

Then all the chumps that invested in those grifts can finally sell their massive holdings.

ReynaBucks - if you were feeling REALLY stupid that morning.

16 posted on 07/09/2026 6:48:53 PM PDT by kiryandil (Democraps are gay-Islamic-race-communists )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

The 900Wh/L is the only thing this battery has over existing fast charge LFP cells.

CATL has demonstrated in a production car not just a beta 3 min and 40 seconds charging 10-80% and 6 min to 100%. With 9 min from 10% to 100% at minus 30C. They have this pack in a 1000km range EV.

Game set match there is no other tech needed.

Even smaller cheaper 500km packs with 3 min charging eliminates the case entirely for larger packs.

I personally didn’t own a car or SUV before 2005 that has a longer than 300 mile range every single one had 250 ish miles before the fuel light turned on. With 5 min fuel stops it is irrelevant that you need to stop once every 3-4 hours in the seat. Only my modern era hybrid and turbo cars crossed the 400 mile range mark and it still didn’t matter with 5 min refuel.

CATL 3 min packs could be 200 mile packs and that would be 3 hours in the seat before a 3 min top up. This is as irrelevant as the 5 min refuel in past suvs. The fact that it’s in a 1000km EV is vast overkill a 300km pack 1/3 the size would with 3 min charging reach any seat busting.distance per day. Fast DC chargers are every 50 miles down major highways in the USA and in China they are closer than that. The tech is 3-4 min chargers using their GB/T plug that can do 1200V at 1000amps today right now at the retail level that’s actually faster than a 3 min top up in a car sized pack that’s semi truck level charging in the mandatory break times in an 8 hour on duty period level fill ups. You legally cannot drive diesel or not without a mandatory break outside the cab in a solid 8 hour window and after 10 you must stop and rest for ten hours as well.


20 posted on 07/09/2026 6:58:56 PM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

Then all they have do is provide power ports on the outside of nuclear power plants to charge them in 9 minutes. Because the power grid sure can’t handle it.


32 posted on 07/09/2026 7:32:40 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7
Recent technical specifications point to potential improvements in performance, including ranges approaching 600 miles and rapid charging times of nine minutes.

They've got my attention.

33 posted on 07/09/2026 7:37:34 PM PDT by GOPJ (The good thing about Commie Revolutions - they kill useful idiots first... Bye bye liberal elites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7
600 mile range, 9 minute charge....20 year life.

...and only 20 years till production.

43 posted on 07/10/2026 4:34:51 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (FTL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: delta7

Fast charge is a great feature, can the grid handle hundreds of these vehicles charging at the same time drawing massive amounts of energy in such a short time?


44 posted on 07/10/2026 4:38:40 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson